No way that spot on the last punt of the first half was right. Correct spot was 20 yards back. Geometry doesn't lie. What am I missing?

SEC refs fixing games. Not that you missed it, but it is a thing.

I'm surprised announcers did not mention it.

Why would they? Manning family overlords forbid it.

Yep 20 free yards. Atrocious!!

A t.u. loss is bad for business

SEC has the worst officiating of all conferences and it's not even close.

Nah, just a major hook?? Kinda like my Boom Boom driver!

One thing that the Big 10 or ACC has right is the broadcasting of reviews to hear what is being said. Can almost ensure that never happens in the SEC. Can't afford everyone hearing "we gotta protect the burnt orange calf at all expense"

cmillion20 said:

---

A t.u. loss is bad for business

---

Hence anyone with a brain not wanting to accept them into the conference. The voters (and our guy included) are at fault for this *****

AgBQ_95 said:

---

One thing that the Big 10 or ACC has right is the broadcasting of reviews to hear what is being said. Can almost ensure that never happens in the SEC. Can't afford everyone hearing "we gotta protect the burnt orange calf at all expense"

---

SEC will never do it. Bc they are corrupt and "blue blood" driven to protect certain teams.

Until the playoff committee goes away and a SIMPLE algorithm is employed, it's all corrupted BS

Quote:

---

Until the playoff committee goes away and a SIMPLE algorithm is employed, it's all corrupted BS

---

Who would get in that's currently left out with this SIMPLE algorithm?

Broadcast showed the video. Ball landed out of bounds before taking that long roll

Thanks. But I think Arky is changing QB

BMX Bandit said:

---

Quote:

---

Until the playoff committee goes away and a SIMPLE algorithm is employed, it's all corrupted BS

---

Who would get in that's currently left out with this SIMPLE algorithm?

---

An algorithm that employs SOS is what I meant There is no bias without perceived status of certain programs. The committee tries to hide the bias but they have failed.

Their algorithm does. It's not just not a very good one.



So I ask again. Who would be in that's not in this non-BS algorithm?

Block in the back

That was what I missed

The horns are barely in the top half in tv ratings so what it is that is being protected? Tennessee has significantly better tv ratings than Texas. Does the SEC protect Tennessee?

BMX Bandit said:

---

Their algorithm does. It's not just not a very good one.



So I ask again. Who would be in that's not in this non-BS algorithm?

---

Undefeated teams and it is what it is. The coaches voting and AP rankings are also BS. So how is it made fair?

There has to be a numbers/non-biased option.

Otherwise, enjoy seeing Tulane, ND, and TX Tech in the playoffs and they are quickly ejected bc they can't compete


How many ND playoff games have we suffered through where they were dominated and had no reason being there?

How do you make if fair when only a few Big 10 wins and all SEC wins dominate the NC winners list?

These lower programs can't compete.

So who should be in over those three teams?

We thought we joined a family. We did…the mafia.

BMX Bandit said:

---

So who should be in over those three teams?

---

No one bc the top 3 are undefeated. Go get a programmer for said algorithm or rely on Sagarin.

They spotted it on the wrong side of the 50. So bizarre.

deer corn said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

So who should be in over those three teams?

---

No one bc the top 3 are undefeated. Go get a programmer for said algorithm or rely on Sagarin.

---

The sagarin that has us 6? Yeah, that's great idea.

BMX Bandit said:

---

deer corn said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

So who should be in over those three teams?

---

No one bc the top 3 are undefeated. Go get a programmer for said algorithm or rely on Sagarin.

---

.
The sagarin that has us 6? Yeah, that's great idea.

---

Better than a committee biased on pre-conceived notions or politics and blue blood programs. The true champion will win regardless of ranking or else they shouldn't have been there. Maybe there is a better algorithm. Maybe there isn't

But don't ***** about the committee reqs and who serves on it when **** teams make it in.

We might be a **** team as many have pointed out with an easy schedule. Who can predict or oversee that?

Who determines what a **** schedule is to begin with?

The fact this committee has us number 4 and sagarin has us 6 (behind notre dame) shows that the committee is clearly much better than that computer

Remember all the nattys claimed in early years? Thode programs are **** now, but how about then? Why didn't the blue bloods win those?

It's the same with today and how rankings are determined. And now we have a corrupt committee doling out requirements for convenience with no considerations given to season wins before Nov.

Yeah. A great system going on now.

Who?mikejones! said:

---

---

How did Petrino not go ballistic on that spot.

A. G. Pennypacker said:

---

Who?mikejones! said:

---

---

How did Petrino not go ballistic on that spot.

---

Cameras did not show him?

You're very naive.

It was simply impossible. The only logical possible spot would have been it being blocked with crazy spin, hitting at the spot, then bouncing up, back into the field and out to land a foot out of bound where we saw it land

**** t.u. I FULLY expect some buttwhack goofy officiating when we play them.