That is a catch
Tergdor said:
That looked like a catch
Won't get overturned though
agsquirrel97 said:
If lagway didn't under throw him by 20 yards, it's a TD and no discussion about catch/no catch.
Can't believe this dude beat tu and had uGA on the ropes.
Jawn Dough said:
Nothing there to overturn the call but I think it was a catch.
Jawn Dough said:
Nothing there to overturn the call but I think it was a catch.
I'd bet Notre Dame is ahead. SMU is a worse loss than what ND hasW said:
will be interesting to see how the committee ranks Miami (6-2) vs. Notre Dame (6-2)
Bob Knights Liver said:
They had good angles on that replay. With the ball coming in sideways on his forearms I don't see how it's physically possible that it contacted the ground. SEC reffing though. Consistent if nothing else.
Win out and we face Georgia in the championship game?
Onionman said:
Will say watching it live I thought there was no way it was a catch. But then on replay looked like it might be a catch.
Unless you have a camera angle where you can see that the ball didn't touch the grass between his arms you can't overturn it. If the call on the field was catch (which it should have been) it would have been upheld as a catch.PascalsWager said:
Show me a single pixel, angle, ANYTHING where the ball touched the ground. Even if you think its jostled. Its IN his arms! The ball made no contact with the ground at all.
At the very least they've gotta get better cameras.
PascalsWager said:
Show me a single pixel, angle, ANYTHING where the ball touched the ground. Even if you think its jostled. Its IN his arms! The ball made no contact with the ground at all.
At the very least they've gotta get better cameras.