Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

ESPN is getting rediculous

11,617 Views | 69 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by Maroon Dawn
Artimus Gordon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let them build up ol' buttercup manning all they want! Let's see if he can live up to expectations. He's certainly got a target on his back
seebond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
07ag said:

seebond said:


And to think this was the best it ever got.
Back when they covered actual sports. Go figure!

dan and keith were better

Yep. But it was the first pic I found in that era and just went with it.
JROD9398
How long do you want to ignore this user?
07ag said:

seebond said:


And to think this was the best it ever got.
Back when they covered actual sports. Go figure!

dan and keith were better

Keith should have stuck with sports and kept his mouth shut about politics. He is no longer relevant. Period.
Jawn Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Dad 26 said:

They're just following the easy money. Easy topics that suck in the masses

Pretty much this.

Just like reality TV shows, they're relatively inexpensive to produce but still bring in the viewership numbers.
Ol Jock 99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rootube said:

Ol Jock 99 said:

A ratings driven business is talking about a young member of Football's Royal Family taking the reins at one of college football's biggest brands?

SHOCKING.


You referring to the Manning's as a royal family tells me ESPN is succeeding in its mission.

Right right right. Unless Arch gets hurt like his old man, they'll have 3 generations of NLF QBs. With the first 2 being highly decorated. Families like that are basically a dime a dozen.
King of the Dairy Queen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When it was JFF Darren Rovell was going through his garbage cans looking for something incriminating
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
King of the Dairy Queen said:

When it was JFF Darren Rovell was going through his garbage cans looking for something incriminating


Does Arch have a history of alcohol and drug use, possibly during games, massive partying in the spotlight, and making money improperly?

If so then the media would be running that down faster than they tried to with Manziel.
Richleau12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well arch does have some coked out eyes. Either that or he hasn't slept for a week.
fightinag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ESiPN has been this way for 30 years so Im expecting it just like I do with Texas Football Magazine.
Win a natty and we still wouldn't make either.
So.........stay away from both
NEXT YEAR IS HERE.......again
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

When it was JFF Darren Rovell was going through his garbage cans looking for something incriminating


Does Arch have a history of alcohol and drug use, possibly during games, massive partying in the spotlight, and making money improperly?

If so then the media would be running that down faster than they tried to with Manziel.


Ha you mean digging faster than they'd need to hide dead hookers?
King of the Dairy Queen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

When it was JFF Darren Rovell was going through his garbage cans looking for something incriminating


Does Arch have a history of alcohol and drug use, possibly during games, massive partying in the spotlight, and making money improperly?

If so then the media would be running that down faster than they tried to with Manziel.

JFF was possibly the most famous college athlete ever, a pop culture phenomenon. No other player would ever get that treatment.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
King of the Dairy Queen said:

Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

When it was JFF Darren Rovell was going through his garbage cans looking for something incriminating


Does Arch have a history of alcohol and drug use, possibly during games, massive partying in the spotlight, and making money improperly?

If so then the media would be running that down faster than they tried to with Manziel.

JFF was possibly the most famous college athlete ever, a pop culture phenomenon. No other player would ever get that treatment.


He wasn't even the most popular college athlete within a decade before or after his stint. Other guys didn't get the treatment because it wasn't a known thing among all media circles that the other guys were doing things as ridiculous as he was. Except Jameis. Who got scrutiny for everything he did. Please stop trying to act like he didn't invite every bit of the bad media attention he got.
Hehateme1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
the rediculous dude as the OP

the goofy ass winky obnoxious dude trolling

self loathing ags being ashamed by JFF


this thread is pretty sweet offseason TexAgs fare
Captain Winky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, the very first response completely destroyed your terrible whiney post. There wasn't anything more that could be said, so the next best thing was to ridicule your spelling.
AGinHI
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's been 8 years since I've watched any ESPN shows

It's now been 3 years since I've watched any live Aggie games on a streaming service I'm paying for.

What have I missed?
NyAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I haven't watched non-game content on espn in about 20 years, except for gameday which I stopped watching about 5 years ago
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The 30 for 30s are actually pretty solid
Beyond that they offer nothing other than hosts trying WAY too hard to become celebrities and a bunch of moral-grandstanding BS. I hate that the SEC is in bed with them. They're the reason tu got brought in
zafzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rootube said:

Ol Jock 99 said:

A ratings driven business is talking about a young member of Football's Royal Family taking the reins at one of college football's biggest brands?

SHOCKING.


You referring to the Manning's as a royal family tells me ESPN is succeeding in its mission.

What family would you consider to be Football's Royal Family?

What other family has produced three elite college football and NFL QBs with a possible fourth yet to be determined across three generations?

I'm ambivalent about the Mannings but I'm not sure there is another family out there with their football pedigree.
TXAG 05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dixichkn said:

The 30 for 30s are actually pretty solid
Beyond that they offer nothing other than hosts trying WAY too hard to become celebrities and a bunch of moral-grandstanding BS. I hate that the SEC is in bed with them. They're the reason tu got brought in

The SEC saw the writing on the wall with the future of the conferences and tv deals. It was either bring them in or give their eyeballs to the Big10
KevinTeters04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zafzo said:

What family would you consider to be Football's Royal Family?


I mean, the Matthews family comes to mind…

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthews_family
TexAgTrojan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Joes said:

What's so red about them?

And the idea that there should be some kind of balance between A&M and Texas nationally is silly, no matter how much of a homer you are. It's like Oklahoma State wondering why people talk about OU instead of them. I mean, Texas/Ohio State will be the 38th time Texas and their opponent have both been in the top 5. A&M has been in 4, ever. Texas this century has won a title, played for another, and been one game away from the championship game the last two years. A&M has exceeded 9 wins ONCE since 1998. What the heck do you expect?
it also helps to be overrated year after year because of your name. No one has been more overrated all time than tu. They, more than any other school, have finished the season ranked lower than they started. Florida state is second all time.
TexAgTrojan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ol Jock 99 said:

rootube said:

Ol Jock 99 said:

A ratings driven business is talking about a young member of Football's Royal Family taking the reins at one of college football's biggest brands?

SHOCKING.


You referring to the Manning's as a royal family tells me ESPN is succeeding in its mission.

Right right right. Unless Arch gets hurt like his old man, they'll have 3 generations of NLF QBs. With the first 2 being highly decorated. Families like that are basically a dime a dozen.
wait till they watch him try and throw the football. He'll get drafted on name. He is the next Chris Simms
AgExtension
How long do you want to ignore this user?
During this dead period of sports, really if you are listening to sports radio or watching ESPN you really have to question your decision making paradigm. I live in Colorado and the Rockies don't count as a major league team, so there is literally nothing worth paying attention to in sports for another month.
QB1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He should sit out the season….

Hell, he has already won the heisman, a natty, and been selected as the #1 pick in the draft.

Why play bruh???
jja79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
3 generations of Matthews trumps them.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jja79 said:

3 generations of Matthews trumps them.


Matthews' are the NFL's First Family. Manning's are the NFL's Royal Family.
King of the Dairy Queen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

When it was JFF Darren Rovell was going through his garbage cans looking for something incriminating


Does Arch have a history of alcohol and drug use, possibly during games, massive partying in the spotlight, and making money improperly?

If so then the media would be running that down faster than they tried to with Manziel.

JFF was possibly the most famous college athlete ever, a pop culture phenomenon. No other player would ever get that treatment.


He wasn't even the most popular college athlete within a decade before or after his stint. Other guys didn't get the treatment because it wasn't a known thing among all media circles that the other guys were doing things as ridiculous as he was. Except Jameis. Who got scrutiny for everything he did. Please stop trying to act like he didn't invite every bit of the bad media attention he got.

I noticed you didnt name anyone. Youre painting with what you know now over what you knew then. I would argue much of the disgrace he fell into was a result of the fame. Dude was a household name in America, pretty much no college football player has been since. Everything I am talking about started before the autograph bs. The only reason they cared about the autograph bs is because of who he was. I regret to inform you many players were selling their autograph but no one seemed to care.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
King of the Dairy Queen said:

Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

When it was JFF Darren Rovell was going through his garbage cans looking for something incriminating


Does Arch have a history of alcohol and drug use, possibly during games, massive partying in the spotlight, and making money improperly?

If so then the media would be running that down faster than they tried to with Manziel.

JFF was possibly the most famous college athlete ever, a pop culture phenomenon. No other player would ever get that treatment.


He wasn't even the most popular college athlete within a decade before or after his stint. Other guys didn't get the treatment because it wasn't a known thing among all media circles that the other guys were doing things as ridiculous as he was. Except Jameis. Who got scrutiny for everything he did. Please stop trying to act like he didn't invite every bit of the bad media attention he got.

I noticed you didnt name anyone.


Tim Tebow.

I thought that was obvious.
King of the Dairy Queen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

When it was JFF Darren Rovell was going through his garbage cans looking for something incriminating


Does Arch have a history of alcohol and drug use, possibly during games, massive partying in the spotlight, and making money improperly?

If so then the media would be running that down faster than they tried to with Manziel.

JFF was possibly the most famous college athlete ever, a pop culture phenomenon. No other player would ever get that treatment.


He wasn't even the most popular college athlete within a decade before or after his stint. Other guys didn't get the treatment because it wasn't a known thing among all media circles that the other guys were doing things as ridiculous as he was. Except Jameis. Who got scrutiny for everything he did. Please stop trying to act like he didn't invite every bit of the bad media attention he got.

I noticed you didnt name anyone.


Tim Tebow.

I thought that was obvious.

It wasnt, because its wrong.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
King of the Dairy Queen said:

Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

When it was JFF Darren Rovell was going through his garbage cans looking for something incriminating


Does Arch have a history of alcohol and drug use, possibly during games, massive partying in the spotlight, and making money improperly?

If so then the media would be running that down faster than they tried to with Manziel.

JFF was possibly the most famous college athlete ever, a pop culture phenomenon. No other player would ever get that treatment.


He wasn't even the most popular college athlete within a decade before or after his stint. Other guys didn't get the treatment because it wasn't a known thing among all media circles that the other guys were doing things as ridiculous as he was. Except Jameis. Who got scrutiny for everything he did. Please stop trying to act like he didn't invite every bit of the bad media attention he got.

I noticed you didnt name anyone.


Tim Tebow.

I thought that was obvious.

It wasnt, because its wrong.


It's absolutely right. The only difference was Manziel was in the era of social media but that didn't make manziel more popular/famous.

But go back to crying about how Johnny got some unfavorable treatment or whatever.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

Bunk Moreland said:

King of the Dairy Queen said:

When it was JFF Darren Rovell was going through his garbage cans looking for something incriminating


Does Arch have a history of alcohol and drug use, possibly during games, massive partying in the spotlight, and making money improperly?

If so then the media would be running that down faster than they tried to with Manziel.

JFF was possibly the most famous college athlete ever, a pop culture phenomenon. No other player would ever get that treatment.


He wasn't even the most popular college athlete within a decade before or after his stint. Other guys didn't get the treatment because it wasn't a known thing among all media circles that the other guys were doing things as ridiculous as he was. Except Jameis. Who got scrutiny for everything he did. Please stop trying to act like he didn't invite every bit of the bad media attention he got.

I noticed you didnt name anyone.


Tim Tebow.

I thought that was obvious.


I don't know. Tebow was just famous for playing college football and wearing his religion on his sleeve. JFF was courting celebrities and pictured with LeBron, Justin Bieber, etc. at events.
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Joes said:

What's so red about them?

And the idea that there should be some kind of balance between A&M and Texas nationally is silly, no matter how much of a homer you are. It's like Oklahoma State wondering why people talk about OU instead of them. I mean, Texas/Ohio State will be the 38th time Texas and their opponent have both been in the top 5. A&M has been in 4, ever. Texas this century has won a title, played for another, and been one game away from the championship game the last two years. A&M has exceeded 9 wins ONCE since 1998. What the heck do you expect?
Texas has 1 trophy since segregation ended in football 50 years ago, goober. And he wasn't asking for as much media attention as those dorks. He was saying they're propping up this overrated inbred kid at Sips.
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captain Winky said:

Well, the very first response completely destroyed your terrible whiney post. There wasn't anything more that could be said, so the next best thing was to ridicule your spelling.
the first response was goofy as hell as it was just a strawman argument acting like OP wanted equal coverage when he was pointing out the inbred Manning kid being used to prop up the gay goobers of Austin.

halfastros81 said:

I don't care . Manning is a good kid imo and maybe a top flight qb and clearly has the advantage of name recognition. Great. We just need to figure out how to beat tu.
Lol. How tf would you know if he's a good kid. Lmao "maybe top flight QB"…well how prescient. And you want a secret on how to beat the Sips (like we've split the series with them like 20-20 the last 40 years), have a QB who doesn't suck.
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jawn Dough said:

Aggie Dad 26 said:

They're just following the easy money. Easy topics that suck in the masses

Pretty much this.

Just like reality TV shows, they're relatively inexpensive to produce but still bring in the viewership numbers.
Manning kid isn't bringing in big numbers on YouTube. ESPN's college football channel and Finebaum have been trying to use the Manning name to get views, but their videos are quite weak in viewership. Kind of embarrassing how few views they're achieving off the goober Manning inbred.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd love for us to be a real threat to win the national title instead of the team that craps the bed every time they appear on a national broadcast. Pretty sure we'd get more love as the first than the reality that is the second
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.