Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

ESPN says A&M favored -21 against UTSA…

11,467 Views | 73 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by TX_Aggie37
Johnny Boyziel 2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgsMyDude said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

I'll be that guy. This board has become insufferable and overrun by miserable downers without ag tags.


At least they are realistic and not expecting 10 wins annual then cry all season when it doesn't happen.


They are going to find a reason to cry all season and off season regardless of what happens.
agmeister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texas A&M had the highest scoring offense in the SEC in games played against SEC opponents last year. Yet some of you love to wallow in your own miserable negativity by posting crap.

I, for one, am looking forward to this year .
AgsMyDude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

AgsMyDude said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

I'll be that guy. This board has become insufferable and overrun by miserable downers without ag tags.


At least they are realistic and not expecting 10 wins annual then cry all season when it doesn't happen.


They are going to find a reason to cry all season and off season regardless of what happens.


I'm talking about fans like you. That expect 11 wins every year and cry the whole season when we do our normal 8 wins. It's worse than the realists.
Chips2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great.... I just bought tickets to this game... and I find this thread.

And the worst part is, I agree with all of it.
Johnny Boyziel 2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgsMyDude said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

AgsMyDude said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

I'll be that guy. This board has become insufferable and overrun by miserable downers without ag tags.


At least they are realistic and not expecting 10 wins annual then cry all season when it doesn't happen.


They are going to find a reason to cry all season and off season regardless of what happens.


I'm talking about fans like you. That expect 11 wins every year and cry the whole season when we do our normal 8 wins. It's worse than the realists.


I have never done that. Yet here you are crying before the season has even started. You shouldn't let the performance of 18-22 year olds have such an impact on you. Maybe you wouldn't have such a sad life if so.
Aggie Dad 26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

AgsMyDude said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

I'll be that guy. This board has become insufferable and overrun by miserable downers without ag tags.


At least they are realistic and not expecting 10 wins annual then cry all season when it doesn't happen.


They are going to find a reason to cry all season and off season regardless of what happens.


If we win 10 games you won't hear a peep out of me. I'll buy you drinks all night the Saturday they pull off 10 wins during the regular season
AgsMyDude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

AgsMyDude said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

AgsMyDude said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

I'll be that guy. This board has become insufferable and overrun by miserable downers without ag tags.


At least they are realistic and not expecting 10 wins annual then cry all season when it doesn't happen.


They are going to find a reason to cry all season and off season regardless of what happens.


I'm talking about fans like you. That expect 11 wins every year and cry the whole season when we do our normal 8 wins. It's worse than the realists.


I have never done that. Yet here you are crying before the season has even started. You shouldn't let the performance of 18-22 year olds have such an impact on you. Maybe you wouldn't have such a sad life if so.


Where am I crying? I never made a prediction, nor cried.
Paul Pierce Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agmeister said:

Texas A&M had the highest scoring offense in the SEC in games played against SEC opponents last year.


Actually, that's false. Take out defensive scores and we fall to like 4th or something in the SEC for offensive points per game.

And with the relatively easy SEC schedule we had, we really should've been higher.

Plus, our offense in general struggled mightily to sustain drives- we feasted on short fields in a bunch of games.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.
World's worst proofreader
TexasAggiesWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How many farms are being bet on this game? LFG
Haleyscomet50
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.
We played one of the top 5 teams in the conference it was a easy schedule.
Justice Beaver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****


It's pretty easy to look it up and see it wasn't that easy after all. But i know that's not what you want to hear.
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haleyscomet50 said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.
We played one of the top 5 teams in the conference it was a easy schedule.


tu #1, LSU, Missouri, and USC all tied for #5. We played 5 times with .500 or better conference record. 4 had winning records.

2023 we played 4 teams with .500 confernece record or better. 2022 we played 5 teams but only 2 had winning records. 2021 we played 4 teams but only 2 had winning records.
VP at Pierce and Pierce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our offense struggled down the stretch, there's no denying that. Losing Moss hurt as it became apparent we had zero burst and not much vision at the RB position behind him. But the play calling was suspect and the QB decision making left me scratching my head too often. A lot of low hanging fruit to improve on.
Justice Beaver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****


It's pretty easy to look it up and see it wasn't that easy after all. But i know that's not what you want to hear.


I looked it up:
-No Bama
-No Georgia
-No Ole Miss
-No Tennessee
-2 toughest conf games: tu and LSU at Kyle
-caught FL early in the season with QB issues/before they got hot
-2 road games against abysmal teams; Auburn & Miss State
-average Arky at a neutral site

It's "not what I want to hear" because it's simply not true. …It's just a false narrative and an excuse you cling to for dear life to justify your endless pumping in the face of the program's performance last year.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****


It's pretty easy to look it up and see it wasn't that easy after all. But i know that's not what you want to hear.


I looked it up:
-No Bama
-No Georgia
-No Ole Miss
-No Tennessee
-2 toughest conf games: tu and LSU at Kyle
-caught FL early in the season with QB issues/before they got hot
-2 road games against abysmal teams; Auburn & Miss State
-average Arky at a neutral site

It's "not what I want to hear" because it's simply not true. …It's just a false narrative and an excuse you cling to for dear life to justify your endless pumping in the face of the program's performance last year.


Look at the entire schedule not just a couple games.
VP at Pierce and Pierce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****


It's pretty easy to look it up and see it wasn't that easy after all. But i know that's not what you want to hear.


I looked it up:
-No Bama
-No Georgia
-No Ole Miss
-No Tennessee
-2 toughest conf games: tu and LSU at Kyle
-caught FL early in the season with QB issues/before they got hot
-2 road games against abysmal teams; Auburn & Miss State
-average Arky at a neutral site

It's "not what I want to hear" because it's simply not true. …It's just a false narrative and an excuse you cling to for dear life to justify your endless pumping in the face of the program's performance last year.


Look at the entire schedule not just a couple games.


Notre Dame - 13
Florida - 26
Bowling Green - 26
Arky - 21
South Carolina - 20
tu - 0

Half the schedule we couldn't break 26. Broke 30 against a good Missouri team, Auburn, miss state, and lsu (thanks to 3 short fields).

You and I both know this offense was anemic at times and the passing game resembled Jimbo with lots of curls, outs, and comebacks. We love to talk about our lack of talent at WR yet we started every game with passing concepts that require great routes and accurate throws, two things we didn't really have. Klein is going to have show something this fall.

Haleyscomet50
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

Haleyscomet50 said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.
We played one of the top 5 teams in the conference it was a easy schedule.


tu #1, LSU, Missouri, and USC all tied for #5. We played 5 times with .500 or better conference record. 4 had winning records.

2023 we played 4 teams with .500 confernece record or better. 2022 we played 5 teams but only 2 had winning records. 2021 we played 4 teams but only 2 had winning records.
I get what your saying with the conference record that's the way the schedule were drawn up according to Sankey. You can make it look good on paper but it's not real. Georgia played Bama Ole miss Tennessee and tu. This schedule was a gift to us for letting the bad guys in. Luckily we get this year too and should have a easy shot at playoffs. Things will change next go around suppose to use some common sense in the next schedule set so you don't end up with Georgia playing that schedule and us playing ours.

Johnny Boyziel 2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Dad 26 said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

AgsMyDude said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

I'll be that guy. This board has become insufferable and overrun by miserable downers without ag tags.


At least they are realistic and not expecting 10 wins annual then cry all season when it doesn't happen.


They are going to find a reason to cry all season and off season regardless of what happens.


If we win 10 games you won't hear a peep out of me. I'll buy you drinks all night the Saturday they pull off 10 wins during the regular season


I have more confidence in a meth addict quitting cold turkey for 5 bucks than you quitting posting for any reason. I have zero interest in going to a bar with someone who would be on their phone on texags the entire time.
SA-AG72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

Aggie Dad 26 said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

AgsMyDude said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

I'll be that guy. This board has become insufferable and overrun by miserable downers without ag tags.


At least they are realistic and not expecting 10 wins annual then cry all season when it doesn't happen.


They are going to find a reason to cry all season and off season regardless of what happens.


If we win 10 games you won't hear a peep out of me. I'll buy you drinks all night the Saturday they pull off 10 wins during the regular season


I have more confidence in a meth addict quitting cold turkey for 5 bucks than you quitting posting for any reason. I have zero interest in going to a bar with someone who would be on their phone on texags the entire time.


Why don't you two kiss and makeup. Your banter is very childish!
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haleyscomet50 said:

vander54 said:

Haleyscomet50 said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.
We played one of the top 5 teams in the conference it was a easy schedule.


tu #1, LSU, Missouri, and USC all tied for #5. We played 5 times with .500 or better conference record. 4 had winning records.

2023 we played 4 teams with .500 confernece record or better. 2022 we played 5 teams but only 2 had winning records. 2021 we played 4 teams but only 2 had winning records.
I get what your saying with the conference record that's the way the schedule were drawn up according to Sankey. You can make it look good on paper but it's not real. Georgia played Bama Ole miss Tennessee and tu. This schedule was a gift to us for letting the bad guys in. Luckily we get this year too and should have a easy shot at playoffs. Things will change next go around suppose to use some common sense in the next schedule set so you don't end up with Georgia playing that schedule and us playing ours.




I get what you're saying but our schedule still was way tougher than originally thought. Also i never claimed it was the hardest in the SEC but it was in the top half and one of our toughest overall schedules since joining the SEC.
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****


It's pretty easy to look it up and see it wasn't that easy after all. But i know that's not what you want to hear.


I looked it up:
-No Bama
-No Georgia
-No Ole Miss
-No Tennessee
-2 toughest conf games: tu and LSU at Kyle
-caught FL early in the season with QB issues/before they got hot
-2 road games against abysmal teams; Auburn & Miss State
-average Arky at a neutral site

It's "not what I want to hear" because it's simply not true. …It's just a false narrative and an excuse you cling to for dear life to justify your endless pumping in the face of the program's performance last year.


Look at the entire schedule not just a couple games.


Notre Dame - 13
Florida - 26
Bowling Green - 26
Arky - 21
South Carolina - 20
tu - 0

Half the schedule we couldn't break 26. Broke 30 against a good Missouri team, Auburn, miss state, and lsu (thanks to 3 short fields).

You and I both know this offense was anemic at times and the passing game resembled Jimbo with lots of curls, outs, and comebacks. We love to talk about our lack of talent at WR yet we started every game with passing concepts that require great routes and accurate throws, two things we didn't really have. Klein is going to have show something this fall.




I agree we need to see improvement but i was talking about SOS.

DFEI

Notre Dame - 1
Florida - 21
Bowling Green - 62
Arky - 46
South Carolina - 8
tu - 3

3 of those teams had elite defenses. Arkansas always does that to us. Bowling Green is the only WTF game on that list. Outside of tu but our entire team looked like ****
World's worst proofreader
VP at Pierce and Pierce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****


It's pretty easy to look it up and see it wasn't that easy after all. But i know that's not what you want to hear.


I looked it up:
-No Bama
-No Georgia
-No Ole Miss
-No Tennessee
-2 toughest conf games: tu and LSU at Kyle
-caught FL early in the season with QB issues/before they got hot
-2 road games against abysmal teams; Auburn & Miss State
-average Arky at a neutral site

It's "not what I want to hear" because it's simply not true. …It's just a false narrative and an excuse you cling to for dear life to justify your endless pumping in the face of the program's performance last year.


Look at the entire schedule not just a couple games.


Notre Dame - 13
Florida - 26
Bowling Green - 26
Arky - 21
South Carolina - 20
tu - 0

Half the schedule we couldn't break 26. Broke 30 against a good Missouri team, Auburn, miss state, and lsu (thanks to 3 short fields).

You and I both know this offense was anemic at times and the passing game resembled Jimbo with lots of curls, outs, and comebacks. We love to talk about our lack of talent at WR yet we started every game with passing concepts that require great routes and accurate throws, two things we didn't really have. Klein is going to have show something this fall.




I agree we need to see improvement but i was talking about SOS.

DFEI

Notre Dame - 1
Florida - 21
Bowling Green - 62
Arky - 46
South Carolina - 8
tu - 3

3 of those teams had elite defenses. Arkansas always does that to us. Bowling Green is the only WTF game on that list. Outside of tu but our entire team looked like ****


Good points and good discussion. We have everything needed for a top 15 or better offense with our OL, RB, TE, and in theory Qb/WR. It's up to Klein, finding a running back who isn't blind and can get vertical, and Reed being accurate and throwing deep when the deep ball is called.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

vander54 said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****


It's pretty easy to look it up and see it wasn't that easy after all. But i know that's not what you want to hear.


I looked it up:
-No Bama
-No Georgia
-No Ole Miss
-No Tennessee
-2 toughest conf games: tu and LSU at Kyle
-caught FL early in the season with QB issues/before they got hot
-2 road games against abysmal teams; Auburn & Miss State
-average Arky at a neutral site

It's "not what I want to hear" because it's simply not true. …It's just a false narrative and an excuse you cling to for dear life to justify your endless pumping in the face of the program's performance last year.


Look at the entire schedule not just a couple games.


Notre Dame - 13
Florida - 26
Bowling Green - 26
Arky - 21
South Carolina - 20
tu - 0

Half the schedule we couldn't break 26. Broke 30 against a good Missouri team, Auburn, miss state, and lsu (thanks to 3 short fields).

You and I both know this offense was anemic at times and the passing game resembled Jimbo with lots of curls, outs, and comebacks. We love to talk about our lack of talent at WR yet we started every game with passing concepts that require great routes and accurate throws, two things we didn't really have. Klein is going to have show something this fall.




I agree we need to see improvement but i was talking about SOS.

DFEI

Notre Dame - 1
Florida - 21
Bowling Green - 62
Arky - 46
South Carolina - 8
tu - 3

3 of those teams had elite defenses. Arkansas always does that to us. Bowling Green is the only WTF game on that list. Outside of tu but our entire team looked like ****


Good points and good discussion. We have everything needed for a top 15 or better offense with our OL, RB, TE, and in theory Qb/WR. It's up to Klein, finding a running back who isn't blind and can get vertical, and Reed being accurate and throwing deep when the deep ball is called.


If Moss and Owens stay healthy we will have an elite running game. Our OL should be a strength. We have improved WR still have questions at TE. Issues really falls at no solid depth at WR and questions with our TEs. Plus will Reed improve his intermediate passes.
World's worst proofreader
agmeister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paul Pierce Ag said:

agmeister said:

Texas A&M had the highest scoring offense in the SEC in games played against SEC opponents last year.


Actually, that's false. Take out defensive scores and we fall to like 4th or something in the SEC for offensive points per game.

And with the relatively easy SEC schedule we had, we really should've been higher.

Plus, our offense in general struggled mightily to sustain drives- we feasted on short fields in a bunch of games.
Our team was the highest scoring team for conference games. That is a fact.
"And with the relatively easy SEC schedule we had, we really should've been higher." That is your opinion. Not a fact.
"Plus, our offense in general struggled mightily to sustain drives- we feasted on short fields in a bunch of games." Each score earns the same number of points.
VP at Pierce and Pierce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

vander54 said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****


It's pretty easy to look it up and see it wasn't that easy after all. But i know that's not what you want to hear.


I looked it up:
-No Bama
-No Georgia
-No Ole Miss
-No Tennessee
-2 toughest conf games: tu and LSU at Kyle
-caught FL early in the season with QB issues/before they got hot
-2 road games against abysmal teams; Auburn & Miss State
-average Arky at a neutral site

It's "not what I want to hear" because it's simply not true. …It's just a false narrative and an excuse you cling to for dear life to justify your endless pumping in the face of the program's performance last year.


Look at the entire schedule not just a couple games.


Notre Dame - 13
Florida - 26
Bowling Green - 26
Arky - 21
South Carolina - 20
tu - 0

Half the schedule we couldn't break 26. Broke 30 against a good Missouri team, Auburn, miss state, and lsu (thanks to 3 short fields).

You and I both know this offense was anemic at times and the passing game resembled Jimbo with lots of curls, outs, and comebacks. We love to talk about our lack of talent at WR yet we started every game with passing concepts that require great routes and accurate throws, two things we didn't really have. Klein is going to have show something this fall.




I agree we need to see improvement but i was talking about SOS.

DFEI

Notre Dame - 1
Florida - 21
Bowling Green - 62
Arky - 46
South Carolina - 8
tu - 3

3 of those teams had elite defenses. Arkansas always does that to us. Bowling Green is the only WTF game on that list. Outside of tu but our entire team looked like ****


Good points and good discussion. We have everything needed for a top 15 or better offense with our OL, RB, TE, and in theory Qb/WR. It's up to Klein, finding a running back who isn't blind and can get vertical, and Reed being accurate and throwing deep when the deep ball is called.


If Moss and Owens stay healthy we will have an elite running game. Our OL should be a strength. We have improved WR still have questions at TE. Issues really falls at no solid depth at WR and questions with our TEs. Plus will Reed improve his intermediate passes.


Yea WR depth is a concern but I love our TE room. The key there is to make sure our best pass catching TEs are in the game on 3rd & long, last season we would have the run blocking tight ends in on 3rd and long and they looked like were running in slow motion.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agmeister said:

Paul Pierce Ag said:

agmeister said:

Texas A&M had the highest scoring offense in the SEC in games played against SEC opponents last year.


Actually, that's false. Take out defensive scores and we fall to like 4th or something in the SEC for offensive points per game.

And with the relatively easy SEC schedule we had, we really should've been higher.

Plus, our offense in general struggled mightily to sustain drives- we feasted on short fields in a bunch of games.
Our team was the highest scoring team for conference games. That is a fact.
"And with the relatively easy SEC schedule we had, we really should've been higher." That is your opinion. Not a fact.
"Plus, our offense in general struggled mightily to sustain drives- we feasted on short fields in a bunch of games." They scored and each score earns the same number of points.


What people fail to realise is that we played 3 top 10 defenses, 5 top 25 and 6 top 30. In the SEC MSU was the only bad defense we faced.


I should include this is based on DFEI
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

vander54 said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

vander54 said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****


It's pretty easy to look it up and see it wasn't that easy after all. But i know that's not what you want to hear.


I looked it up:
-No Bama
-No Georgia
-No Ole Miss
-No Tennessee
-2 toughest conf games: tu and LSU at Kyle
-caught FL early in the season with QB issues/before they got hot
-2 road games against abysmal teams; Auburn & Miss State
-average Arky at a neutral site

It's "not what I want to hear" because it's simply not true. …It's just a false narrative and an excuse you cling to for dear life to justify your endless pumping in the face of the program's performance last year.


Look at the entire schedule not just a couple games.


Notre Dame - 13
Florida - 26
Bowling Green - 26
Arky - 21
South Carolina - 20
tu - 0

Half the schedule we couldn't break 26. Broke 30 against a good Missouri team, Auburn, miss state, and lsu (thanks to 3 short fields).

You and I both know this offense was anemic at times and the passing game resembled Jimbo with lots of curls, outs, and comebacks. We love to talk about our lack of talent at WR yet we started every game with passing concepts that require great routes and accurate throws, two things we didn't really have. Klein is going to have show something this fall.




I agree we need to see improvement but i was talking about SOS.

DFEI

Notre Dame - 1
Florida - 21
Bowling Green - 62
Arky - 46
South Carolina - 8
tu - 3

3 of those teams had elite defenses. Arkansas always does that to us. Bowling Green is the only WTF game on that list. Outside of tu but our entire team looked like ****


Good points and good discussion. We have everything needed for a top 15 or better offense with our OL, RB, TE, and in theory Qb/WR. It's up to Klein, finding a running back who isn't blind and can get vertical, and Reed being accurate and throwing deep when the deep ball is called.


If Moss and Owens stay healthy we will have an elite running game. Our OL should be a strength. We have improved WR still have questions at TE. Issues really falls at no solid depth at WR and questions with our TEs. Plus will Reed improve his intermediate passes.


Yea WR depth is a concern but I love our TE room. The key there is to make sure our best pass catching TEs are in the game on 3rd & long, last season we would have the run blocking tight ends in on 3rd and long and they looked like were running in slow motion.


I'm not going to say I love them but we have a couple that have potential. I like Niblack's potential and the Sweede showed signs of breaking through. Then you have Armstrong who was a stud recruit. So there is talent. Now we just need production.
World's worst proofreader
Justice Beaver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****


It's pretty easy to look it up and see it wasn't that easy after all. But i know that's not what you want to hear.


I looked it up:
-No Bama
-No Georgia
-No Ole Miss
-No Tennessee
-2 toughest conf games: tu and LSU at Kyle
-caught FL early in the season with QB issues/before they got hot
-2 road games against abysmal teams; Auburn & Miss State
-average Arky at a neutral site

It's "not what I want to hear" because it's simply not true. …It's just a false narrative and an excuse you cling to for dear life to justify your endless pumping in the face of the program's performance last year.


Look at the entire schedule not just a couple games.


Only 2 conf games not specifically addressed in my post were Mizz and SC. Which, one was far worse than expected and we got that team at home, and one far better. So basically a wash there.

But you're totally right, that's "just a few games" and "not the whole season."

Or did you want to talk about how good Mcneese, Bowling Green, and NM State were?
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

Justice Beaver said:

vander54 said:

The easy schedule was a false narrative. To start the season it was supposed to be easy. Turns out it was one of the tougher ones at seasons end.


Here we go again with this bull*****


It's pretty easy to look it up and see it wasn't that easy after all. But i know that's not what you want to hear.


I looked it up:
-No Bama
-No Georgia
-No Ole Miss
-No Tennessee
-2 toughest conf games: tu and LSU at Kyle
-caught FL early in the season with QB issues/before they got hot
-2 road games against abysmal teams; Auburn & Miss State
-average Arky at a neutral site

It's "not what I want to hear" because it's simply not true. …It's just a false narrative and an excuse you cling to for dear life to justify your endless pumping in the face of the program's performance last year.


Look at the entire schedule not just a couple games.


Only 2 conf games not specifically addressed in my post were Mizz and SC. Which, one was far worse than expected and we got that team at home, and one far better. So basically a wash there.

But you're totally right, that's "just a few games" and "not the whole season."

Or did you want to talk about how good Mcneese, Bowling Green, and NM State were?



South Carolina was way better than expected and Missouri finished pretty much where they were expected.

Auburn was the only team to finish worse than expected on our schedule. They were projected to go 4-4 but went 2-6. Everyone else matched ir did better than expectations.
World's worst proofreader
Paul Pierce Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Your first post:

agmeister said:

Texas A&M had the highest scoring offense in the SEC in games played against SEC opponents last year.


Not true. Our offense scored 26.375 points per SEC game, tying for 5th in the conference with Florida.


Your second:

agmeister said:

Our team was the highest scoring team for conference games. That is a fact.


Yeah you're right, this is true. But this statement isn't equivalent to the one you made in your first post.
Aggie Dad 26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SA-AG72 said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

Aggie Dad 26 said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

AgsMyDude said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

I'll be that guy. This board has become insufferable and overrun by miserable downers without ag tags.


At least they are realistic and not expecting 10 wins annual then cry all season when it doesn't happen.


They are going to find a reason to cry all season and off season regardless of what happens.


If we win 10 games you won't hear a peep out of me. I'll buy you drinks all night the Saturday they pull off 10 wins during the regular season


I have more confidence in a meth addict quitting cold turkey for 5 bucks than you quitting posting for any reason. I have zero interest in going to a bar with someone who would be on their phone on texags the entire time.


Why don't you two kiss and makeup. Your banter is very childish!


What did i say exactly to him? How many times have I directed something towards him in this thread?
SA-AG72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Dad 26 said:

SA-AG72 said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

Aggie Dad 26 said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

AgsMyDude said:

Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

I'll be that guy. This board has become insufferable and overrun by miserable downers without ag tags.


At least they are realistic and not expecting 10 wins annual then cry all season when it doesn't happen.


They are going to find a reason to cry all season and off season regardless of what happens.


If we win 10 games you won't hear a peep out of me. I'll buy you drinks all night the Saturday they pull off 10 wins during the regular season


I have more confidence in a meth addict quitting cold turkey for 5 bucks than you quitting posting for any reason. I have zero interest in going to a bar with someone who would be on their phone on texags the entire time.


Why don't you two kiss and makeup. Your banter is very childish!


What did i say exactly to him? How many times have I directed something towards him in this thread?


My apologies. I responded to your post but I was actually directing my response to Johnny Boyziel and AgsMyDude.
rockwalltxag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A&M wins by 30+
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.