AgDotCom said:
You're loyal 24/7 when student athletes' first priority is playing for your alma mater. Even if you go 0-11, you'll remain interested and take a bullet for them.
You're not loyal and won't have that level of interest when they play for money 1st and opt out of bowl games.
It's that simple, and many saw it coming when it began 3 years ago. The biggest surprise is the number of people who are surprised it happened.
Oh no…athletes have agency now…cue the tiniest violins in the world to play in unity.
I'll note the following:
1. Professional tennis became a better, more competitive support when the women cast off their shackles of amateurism. This in spite of prophecies of doom.
2. All but wrestling invite professionals to compete in the Olympics. The athletes can receive the equivalent of NIL or private funding or state funding. Generally the competition level has gone up and also in general the desire to represent our nation has not been quenched by all that change.
3. The current NCAA was created by rulings that required fair and lawful support for women in athletics that has created competition that didn't exist before…and while some men revile it, it has its own smashface rough and tumble nature and now professional leagues are emerging. Caitlin and now Paige have helped the grinders get more attention to their sport by their lucky emergence.
The big issue is that at A&M only football generates more operational and contribution income than it spends and the rest depends on that rather thin largesse to survive including potentially profitable basketball and well-lived baseball or even the most popular women's teams. Our front porch is expensive to run.
I think as the House cases are either successfully settled or are sent to trial (when the NCAA is stupid enough to not compromise in grandfathering contemporaneous walk-on spots and the judge merely sends it to trial due to their stubbornness) that the possibility of a bit more stable system could emerge and deal with some of the issues. My personal opinion is a CBA is more stable but in most people's minds turns athletes into common laborers (which it won't.)
Will this be resolved before July 1? If the NCAA can discard their reputation for losing anti-trust suits and say yes…