Nah, nobody has been able to stop him all year. Should've called his number.TAMU74 said:
OSU would have been ready for Manning.
halfastros81 said:
That slow developing pitch out that lost 7 yards on 2nd and goal from the 2 was terrible . You fake that and throw the other way you probably tie the game .
AggieBB said:You mean he was concussed after playing only one play?MyComputerCareer said:
Pretty sure Arch was concussed right before half. Don't think he was available.
What a puss.
Oregon is the only team that scored more than 17 on Ohio St all season, but Arch would have hung 34 on them, minimum.Farmer_J said:
From surleyhorns
7 points in the first half. 7 pts in the second. A mobile QB with a strong arm, Manning, gets you an additional 10 each half, minimum. That would be Texas 34 with our D. OSU wouldn't have stood a chance.
Squadron7 said:
I just can't get past the question: If Arch is all that…why was he still behind Ewers?
Farmer_J said:
From surleyhorns
7 points in the first half. 7 pts in the second. A mobile QB with a strong arm, Manning, gets you an additional 10 each half, minimum. That would be Texas 34 with our D. OSU wouldn't have stood a chance.
We could be heavily favored against ND next week.
Guess Sark decided he could win it all this season without a mobile QB - a completely stupid assessment which he forced on this team and its fans. With all the other stupid calls he's made this year, it looks like he still has some things to learn about football (underscored by that lateral from the one). He can call an offense at a fairly high level, but he needs an OC to give him time to absorb all the other **** - when to kick FGs, and when to punt, for example. He could still second guess his OC. It's a win-win situation.
Edited 3 minutes ago by Irish Wrist Watch
