Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

NCAA is criminal

12,336 Views | 60 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by agracer
Budder01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Game should've never gone to OT. Texas should never have had the ball back. ASU almost beat these losers and the criminal institution NCAA. Pathetic and terrible result for college sports but just like the corrupt world we live in so to be expected
The Hefty Lefty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Much of college football is manipulated and I'll be happy when the NCAA finally crashes and burns.
Ozamataz Buckshank 01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tu brings in more viewers than ASU. This is blatant evidence that the refs were trying help tu win this game. It was shocking that tu kept missing field goals every time the refs bailed them out.
"You can't grade the success of a CEO by how likeable he is."
lagoag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That non targeting call was the biggest piece of crap I've ever seen. Don't tell me the networks aren't for tu to win.
Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Hefty Lefty said:

Much of college football is manipulated and I'll be happy when the NCAA finally crashes and burns.


Then people like you will ***** and complain about the next governing body of whatever conference/ league/ affiliation Ags play in
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As I stated on another thread:

This was the perfect ending for the powers that be. When ESiPN replays this later, they'll scoot by a "questionable call late in the 4th" before they go to 10 more highlights in OT. If that...then they can say officiating had nothing to do with the win.

But it damn sure did.
The Hefty Lefty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie said:

The Hefty Lefty said:

Much of college football is manipulated and I'll be happy when the NCAA finally crashes and burns.


Then people like you will ***** and complain about the next governing body of whatever conference/ league/ affiliation Ags play in


Bro, you stole your wife's Ag Tag.
bryanhome
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They didn't call the deep snapper 10 yards down the field on the fake punt.
Bill Superman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If y'all can't see that it is rigged then you're incapable of intelligent thought. It's always been this way and will never change.
dcg4403
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bunch of whiners.

So many opps for ASU to win. They decided to start playing in 4th.

Horrible coaching calls 1st half.

Has ZERO to do with the crappy miss on that targeting.

Texas isnt winning against the big boys. They can hope to see GA again.

OSU gonna pound them if they play.
deer corn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can't say that with certainty. You also cannot deny that sip has had 3-4 targeting calls overturned in the last month.
TyperWoods
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You kiddos,

tried to tell you, tu gets the benefit of the doubt and more.

ahpetty33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Refs called DPI on skattebos catch when he initiated the contact and pushed off with full extension, and then they had the opportunity to call targeting on ASU's game changing interception but did not… don't attribute to malice what can be attributed to incompetence. The problem with targeting is it is too subjective with too many variables to apparently be called consistently. The refs were bamboozled on this one because the defender did such a good job of keeping his head completely up, even though the hit was delivered square helmet to helmet.

Don't let anything get in the way of a good conspiracy though
rsf0626
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ASU had the chance to win on 4th and 13 and didnt get it done. They were setup perfectly to win and blew it
Aggie1615
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1) Skattebo didn't push off anymore than he was held as he ran by the defender.
2) ASU player didn't have forcible contact to the player's head and neck on the interception play.
3) Competent refs shouldn't be "bamboozled" by a player keeping his head up during forcible contact to the head and neck - the definition is pretty clear vs a defenseless player, and doesn't include position of defender's head.

Otherwise your post is spot on.
Geminiv
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dude I'm a Texas fan. That was targeting lol
DimebagsGhost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bryanhome said:

They didn't call the deep snapper 10 yards down the field on the fake punt.


Deep snapper is allowed.
aggieRB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
John Bible, or his protege , had opportunity to review the helmet to helmet that knocks out the ASU wideout.
He did not get to over rule a no pass interference call- or he would have. This BS been going sip way for at least the 65 years I've been watching the orange menace.
jja79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He was held 10 yards off the line of scrimmage.
jimmo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
was the tu player flagged by the refs in real time on the field?
(then over ruled upon review?)
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No flag was thrown. They automatically reviewed it.
aggieclay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Didn't watch the game, or any game this yr reLly. Its all a joke and rigged one way or another. As for tessus, go watch the '88 North Texas highlights. Sports are for suckers to win/lose $ on. Would you bet on any game that a former student is officiating?

P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The percentage of calls/no calls that benefit Texas are crazy. When they effect the outcomes of their games 3 out of their last 4 that is insane

The announcers said it was clearing targeting, the rules guy they have on said it was targeting, but the refs said while the freaking ASU was still injured due to the play on the field it was not. The play checked all the boxes for targeting: defenseless, helmet to helmet, led with his helmet
deer corn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People that gamble on sports are suckers.
Leander - Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's rigged
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Unlike other NCAA divisions and subdivisions, the NCAA does not officially award an FBS football national championship, nor does it sanction a playoff tournament to determine such a champion on the field. Unlike the belief of many on here, the NCAA does not receive money from the CFP, the FBS conferences and colleges do. The NCAA does run the FCS playoffs.



The CFP is organized by the FBS conferences and is heavily influenced by the conference commissioners who serve the conference members, but also try to satisfy the bowls.



When people want the NCAA to be done so something else can be in charge, they need to know that is already here with FBS Bowls and Playoffs.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DimebagsGhost said:

bryanhome said:

They didn't call the deep snapper 10 yards down the field on the fake punt.


Deep snapper is allowed.
Not once they fake it. Then all normal rules apply against the offense except for a few minor issues like OL numbering.
BkYdPitmaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It has become so routine for tu to pull out a ref-assisted win that I told my son at the 6 minute mark tu would get a random call and win with no time left on a fg. The only part I missed was that bert would actually miss a field goal.
Hamburger Dan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Helmet schools nearly always get the benefit of the doubt. And yes, Texas can be considered a helmet school.
Otherwise, Sankey and the SEC wouldn't have bent over so quickly.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie said:

The Hefty Lefty said:

Much of college football is manipulated and I'll be happy when the NCAA finally crashes and burns.


Then people like you will ***** and complain about the next governing body of whatever conference/ league/ affiliation Ags play in


You win with your hypothetical.
Tex117
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And Texas got more calls against them in a row there at the last bit of the 4th that I've ever seen.

But, also, if that is not targeting, I don't know what is.
RightWingConspirator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I find conspiracy theories about refs conspiring to keep the Ags down and prop the 'horns up completely uninteresting. While that may be the case, I don't know, if the cards have been so stacked against us, why don't we just shut it all down and save our money?

Give it a rest already.

"Why'd you click on this thread??!!"….blah, blah, blah…
zb008
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe they should have stopped sip on 4th and 13?
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
zb008 said:

Maybe they should have stopped sip on 4th and 13?


That's a hot take
MROD92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RightWingConspirator said:

I find conspiracy theories about refs conspiring to keep the Ags down and prop the 'horns up completely uninteresting. While that may be the case, I don't know, if the cards have been so stacked against us, why don't we just shut it all down and save our money?

Give it a rest already.

"Why'd you click on this thread??!!"….blah, blah, blah…



Username does NOT checkout
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.