No call targeting i hope haunts him
VikingNik said:CharlieBrown17 said:VikingNik said:I think it is about avoiding the stinger neck injury of a crown compression. Hitting more with facemask is encouraged for being safer.AlwaysNextYear89 said:but was still helmet to helmet??outlaw46 said:
He had his head up. That is the only way
Use your brain, it's good for you.
If you don't want helmet contact in a full contact sport then eliminate helmets.
I'm saying that what made that hit targeting, was the fact that it was a defenseless receiver, does that characterization change if the ball is tipped, similar to PI not being possible on a tipped ball? I legitimately don't know the answer to that. He didn't hit him with the crown of the helmet, so as a runner, that would be a legal hit, but not towards a defenseless receiver.Aston04 said:So you can target the other team if the ball is tipped?Agmaniacmike12 said:
If he is considered a defenseless receiver, it should have been targeting, but I'm not sure if the ball being tipped changes that equation. Anybody know?
Naw.
halfastros81 said:
Would love to hear the technical interpretation of why that was not targeting.
halfastros81 said:
Would love to hear the technical interpretation of why that was not targeting.
Its becasue it is a rule that is applied ONLY when the REVIEW OFFICIAL wants it to be targeting. HTH.halfastros81 said:
Would love to hear the technical interpretation of why that was not targeting.
AustinAg2K said:
You've got to kick this field goal.
rgag12 said:
tu is the only team in the playoff that has to scratch and claw to beat a wimpy opponent
Twisted Helix said:
Poor spot
halfastros81 said:
Would love to hear the technical interpretation of why that was not targeting.
AustinAg2K said:
You've got to kick this field goal.
DGrimesAg92 said:
why is the spot not being reviewed?
Rule Number 32 said:
You have to kick this