Really hurt the squad last night. We weren't full strength and seemed to lack interest.

Marcel had no help.

Sips starting and responding on the same thread. It's a sip circle jerk everyone.

Their 3rd string RB ran with power and aggression. Our guys fall down after the slightest contact. Moss used to be just as delicate, but he did a 180 this year. Losing our best RB was a serious blow. USC had backups that were still impactful, where we obviously didn't.

LB12Diamond said:

---

Sips starting and responding on the same thread. It's a sip circle jerk everyone.

---

Never fails..Anyone on this board that posts anything positive is labeled a sip

kevmiller said:

---

USC was down to 3rd stringers on the OL, and a freshman 3rd strung running back who hadn't played all year and they ran through us

USC had more players out

---

Yup. 31 points should have been enough to take the game. I expected much more from a Ag team playing against an average USC that was missing key players.

I don't blame them. The bowls mean nothing!

AGFEVER said:

---

LB12Diamond said:

---

Sips starting and responding on the same thread. It's a sip circle jerk everyone.

---

Never fails..Anyone on this board that posts anything positive is labeled a sip

---

Who know if that's what is occurring, but last night there were multiple 'the sky is falling' threads with a dozen posts and not one included a post from someone with an Ag tag. It happens. Social media losers are all over this forum. And I realize there are A&M fans here that don't have Ag tags. Some are my friends and family.

We were using 3rd stringers on OL and DL too. No excuses, but we did not out talent USC on any level other than QB on paper.

They had better RBs, WRs, DL, Lbs and Safeties. OL was a push (we are not good, down on Center, OG, lost best 2 backup IOLs to portal) and OTs were mediocre (esp RT). Couldn't run as IOL were bad last night on run plays.

Nothing but money means anything in this game.

90ags said:

---

We were using 3rd stringers on OL and DL too. No excuses, but we did not out talent USC on any level other than QB on paper.

They had better RBs, WRs, DL, Lbs and Safeties. OL was a push (we are not good, down on Center, OG, lost best 2 backup IOLs to portal) and OTs were mediocre (esp RT). Couldn't run as IOL were bad last night on run plays.

---

Agreed I think the only position on the field we were clearly better was QB

AGFEVER said:

---

LB12Diamond said:

---

Sips starting and responding on the same thread. It's a sip circle jerk everyone.

---

Never fails..Anyone on this board that posts anything positive is labeled a sip

---

LOL

Your post was not positive. It was trolling.

I hope you are trolling bc if you actually think your post was a positive one, I have no words.

LB12Diamond said:

---

AGFEVER said:

---

LB12Diamond said:

---

Sips starting and responding on the same thread. It's a sip circle jerk everyone.

---

Never fails..Anyone on this board that posts anything positive is labeled a sip

---

LOL

Your post was not positive. It was trolling.

I hope you are trolling bc if you actually think your post was a positive one, I have no words.

---

It was completely positive. We had more significant depth issues than USC due to opt outs. At full strength we would obliterate those guys.

LB12Diamond said:

---

AGFEVER said:

---

LB12Diamond said:

---

Sips starting and responding on the same thread. It's a sip circle jerk everyone.

---

Never fails..Anyone on this board that posts anything positive is labeled a sip

---

LOL

Your post was not positive. It was trolling.

I hope you are trolling bc if you actually think your post was a positive one, I have no words.

---

You're initial assessment is the correct one.

It's a sip circle jerk.

AGFEVER said:

---

LB12Diamond said:

---

AGFEVER said:

---

LB12Diamond said:

---

Sips starting and responding on the same thread. It's a sip circle jerk everyone.

---

Never fails..Anyone on this board that posts anything positive is labeled a sip

---

LOL

Your post was not positive. It was trolling.

I hope you are trolling bc if you actually think your post was a positive one, I have no words.

---

It was completely positive. We had more significant depth issues than USC due to opt outs. At full strength we would obliterate those guys.

---

USC lost to five Big Ten teams and Notre Dame

Yeah… cus our opts outs certainly blew a 17 point league.

LMCane said:

---

AGFEVER said:

---

LB12Diamond said:

---

AGFEVER said:

---

LB12Diamond said:

---

Sips starting and responding on the same thread. It's a sip circle jerk everyone.

---

Never fails..Anyone on this board that posts anything positive is labeled a sip

---

LOL

Your post was not positive. It was trolling.

I hope you are trolling bc if you actually think your post was a positive one, I have no words.

---

It was completely positive. We had more significant depth issues than USC due to opt outs. At full strength we would obliterate those guys.

---

USC lost to five Big Ten teams and Notre Dame

---

What does that have to do with anything?