Heard we were down to 51-53 after opt outs, injuries (unexpected) and transfers for the game…anyone know? I knew it was bad when 12th man guy was playing DE (he's like 6th string on depth chart).

If true, we are one if the bowl teams w an incapable roster to really compete (even worse than last yr where Reed ledbus to a loss).

I thought OU had a worse scen at inly 56 players, but maybe we were worse off than putrid OU.

More than USC who only had 3 starters playing on offense

No excuse usc was a Skelton crew. They only score more points vs Utah st, Wisconsin and some other slop team.
10 "toast ricks"

The way the game played out that wasn't really that much of an excuse you. Usc had their backup quarterback in 3rd running back in and made our defense look like the girls flag football team

Not looking for an excuse, but curious to know. Again, its more of seeing how bad this team will be next yr.

Missing a starting DB and OL and lack quality depth at both positions (starter type depth).

DT depth is pathetic and it was shown we only have 1 decent DE (who is consistent).

taylorswift13_ said:

---

More than USC who only had 3 starters playing on offense

---

Truth. That was not a D1 QB we played against last night. Yet he shredded us in Q4. We stink. Always have. Always will.