Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

At least 1 or 2 defensive coaches should be fired

2,170 Views | 18 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by PeekingDuck
Ag8086
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And if Elko does not fire any of them, then explain in detail why they should not be fired. Our defense was suppose to be good, even Elko said this before the season started but continuously got worse. I know we were missing 3 DL but USC was missing several OL, receivers, and running backs and we could not stop a bunch of second stringers. No excuses.
Humorous Username
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All, and I mean ALL of the USC fans on r/CFB were absolutely sure they would not only lose this game, but get blown out.

Joke of a program.
The Banned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We held them to 7 points for 3.75 quarters and then collapsed. That isn't on the DC or position coaches. It stems from a ****ty mentality on the sidelines, and the HC is in charge of that
phatty26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All of them that was pathetic.
Mr. Fingerbottom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Banned said:

We held them to 7 points for 3.75 quarters and then collapsed. That isn't on the DC or position coaches. It stems from a ****ty mentality on the sidelines, and the HC is in charge of that



Bingo


Talked about culture nonstop, then **** the bed & blew 4 of the last 5



Only game they have won since November began is New Mexico State


I was huge Elko fan coming in but it's pretty obvious he's dog****
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Its fine, i had us going 6-6 this year. Wait til next year.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is Elko's defense. You get that? Right?

And he's that one that goes conservative when he gets leads. Did it at Duke as well. Bowl games have to many players out to think defense is going to win the game. They wear down or he does prevent the win D. It's not coincidence our defense looked different in the 4th quarter.
TexasAggie_97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kozmozag said:

Its fine, i had us going 6-6 this year. Wait til next year.
So 5-7 or 7-5?
Ag8086
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It boiled down to not getting any pass rush with a 3 man DL rushing 3 and d backs not being good enough to cover very long. The scheme sucked.
2004FIGHTINTXAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag8086 said:

It boiled down to not getting any pass rush with a 3 man DL rushing 3 and d backs not being good enough to cover very long. The scheme sucked.

I went back and watched the final USC drive. Elko said we rushed four every play in the post game. We actually did rush four every play, but one. We just sucked at getting to the QB.
FarmersFight95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Against a mostly 3rd string USC O-line
Ginormus Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The problem on defense is that our defense practices against our offense all week. The problem with our offense is that it practices against our defense all week. The problem with our coaching is that it sucks at coaching our offense and defense all week. Oh well. Three more years of this and tu being at the top of the SEC and we can do it all over again.

Maybe we can hire Jerrod Johnson and the red head from UIW because they "get" Texas A&M.
Dex_Mick_Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our Safeties might have been the most disappointing position group on the team.

I wonder how much heat JP is getting from Elko?
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LB12Diamond said:

This is Elko's defense. You get that? Right?

And he's that one that goes conservative when he gets leads. Did it at Duke as well. Bowl games have to many players out to think defense is going to win the game. They wear down or he does prevent the win D. It's not coincidence our defense looked different in the 4th quarter.
Yup, was my one hesitation about hiring him. Loves to take foot off the pedal and blow winnable games late. He should have 4-6 more wins on his head coaching resume.
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag8086 said:

And if Elko does not fire any of them, then explain in detail why they should not be fired. Our defense was suppose to be good, even Elko said this before the season started but continuously got worse. I know we were missing 3 DL but USC was missing several OL, receivers, and running backs and we could not stop a bunch of second stringers. No excuses.
Internet tough guy virtue signaling to the other tough guys.
jeffdjohnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No way. This defense is on Elko. He shouldn't be allowed to scapegoat someone after 1 season. He is a former defensive coordinator.
Thompson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jeffdjohnson said:

No way. This defense is on Elko. He shouldn't be allowed to scapegoat someone after 1 season. He is a former defensive coordinator.


So… you want the defense to continue to suck next year, so Elko doesn't get off easy? That'll show him? Have you ever heard the phrase 'cutting off your nose to spite your face?'

At least fire (or demote) Bateman, bring in Fuller or someone, and see if a little new blood / coaching can help. What do you really have to lose?
Ag_EE_88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Our DL under performed all year. 3 NFL picks and what did any of them do this year? Who was over the DL this year? Seems like with that much talent, they should have been able to dominate lines which we did not.
PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You guys need to go and watch the play call on 3rd and 13. It's honestly hilarious. Bateman should be fired for that alone.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.