I asked ChatGPT to create a model for how college football can be structured as an entity separate from the academic institutions, and I think that it actually did a great job. Of course, there are a lot of other detail to work out, such as salary caps, scheduling equity while maintaining rivalries, and promotion/relegation options, but I think this points us in the right general direction.
Model for Separating College Football from Universities
Organizational Structure
1. Independent Football Entities (IFE): Each football program would operate as an independent, for-profit or nonprofit organization.
2. Governed by a Football League Commission (FLC): A new overarching body akin to a professional league (e.g., NFL or USFL).
Affiliation with Academics
1. Maintain branding with the universities but operate independently (e.g., "City Spartans" rather than "University of X Spartans").
2. Universities can license their name and trademarks to the IFEs under mutually agreed terms.
Player Recruitment
1. Players recruited based on athletic ability alone, no academic requirements tied to university enrollment.
2. Players may opt for education separately from their athletic commitments, allowing flexible arrangements for their studies.
Player Compensation
1. Athletes receive contracts, salaries, and benefits akin to professional players.
2. NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) rights fully supported and separate from team compensation.
Revenue Generation
1. Revenue streams from ticket sales, media rights, sponsorships, and merchandising go directly to the football entity.
2. A portion of revenue can be contributed back to the affiliated university as a licensing fee.
Facilities and Operations
1. IFEs lease or purchase facilities (stadiums, training centers) from the universities or build their own.
2. Operate independently with their own administrative, coaching, and support staff.
Competition Structure
1. Organized into divisions and conferences managed by the FLC, similar to professional leagues.
2. Playoff systems and championships organized at the league level.
Academic Opportunities
1. Players provided access to education through partnerships with universities or online education platforms.
2. Scholarships may be replaced by educational stipends or separate educational grants.
Compliance and Oversight
1. The FLC oversees compliance with safety standards, labor laws, and fair play regulations.
2. The NCAA would no longer govern football but could remain a governing body for other collegiate sports.
Transition Period
1. A phased approach to allow universities, athletes, and stakeholders to adapt over 3-5 years.
2. Pilots with select programs before full implementation.
Advantages
[ol]
Clear Boundaries Between Athletics and Academics:
Fair Compensation for Athletes:
Sustainability of College Football:
Enhanced Educational Opportunities:
Reduced Pressure on Universities:
[/ol]
Model for Separating College Football from Universities
Organizational Structure
1. Independent Football Entities (IFE): Each football program would operate as an independent, for-profit or nonprofit organization.
2. Governed by a Football League Commission (FLC): A new overarching body akin to a professional league (e.g., NFL or USFL).
Affiliation with Academics
1. Maintain branding with the universities but operate independently (e.g., "City Spartans" rather than "University of X Spartans").
2. Universities can license their name and trademarks to the IFEs under mutually agreed terms.
Player Recruitment
1. Players recruited based on athletic ability alone, no academic requirements tied to university enrollment.
2. Players may opt for education separately from their athletic commitments, allowing flexible arrangements for their studies.
Player Compensation
1. Athletes receive contracts, salaries, and benefits akin to professional players.
2. NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) rights fully supported and separate from team compensation.
Revenue Generation
1. Revenue streams from ticket sales, media rights, sponsorships, and merchandising go directly to the football entity.
2. A portion of revenue can be contributed back to the affiliated university as a licensing fee.
Facilities and Operations
1. IFEs lease or purchase facilities (stadiums, training centers) from the universities or build their own.
2. Operate independently with their own administrative, coaching, and support staff.
Competition Structure
1. Organized into divisions and conferences managed by the FLC, similar to professional leagues.
2. Playoff systems and championships organized at the league level.
Academic Opportunities
1. Players provided access to education through partnerships with universities or online education platforms.
2. Scholarships may be replaced by educational stipends or separate educational grants.
Compliance and Oversight
1. The FLC oversees compliance with safety standards, labor laws, and fair play regulations.
2. The NCAA would no longer govern football but could remain a governing body for other collegiate sports.
Transition Period
1. A phased approach to allow universities, athletes, and stakeholders to adapt over 3-5 years.
2. Pilots with select programs before full implementation.
Advantages
[ol]
- Eliminates conflicts of interest and ensures universities focus on their academic missions.
- Players are treated as professionals, receiving fair wages, benefits, and other forms of compensation.
- Creates a self-sustaining model independent of university subsidies.
- Athletes can pursue education on their terms, potentially extending their learning period beyond their playing years.
- Universities no longer bear the financial or ethical burden of running high-stakes athletic programs.