Bill Superman said:
Doesn't matter how good of WR's we have if the OL doesn't continue to show progress.
I would say it still matters. More explosive WRs could have kept us from getting shut out against texas, or given us a better chance to keep up with SC, made a play or 2 that could have changed the game against ND, or put us over the top against Auburn. Even with the same OL they definitely could have added a win or even 2.
Either way, back to the OL. I think it's reasonable to expect they will improve. This is the closest comparison to the 2020 OL I have seen. And 2024 was better than 2019. 2020 ended up 1A and 1B with Bama for best OL in the country that year. We are looking at a couple of OTs to potentially fill out the OT depth chart should we lose someone, But I think we only take one if we do lose a guy. The OTs seems to be wanting a more clear path to playing time that as of now, we can't offer.
2019: First year under a new OL coach. Really struggled and were a below middle of the pack OL in the sec. Returned 5 guys with starting experience including a RSR, SR, SR, SR and SO.
2024: First year under a new OL coach AND a new OC. Struggled some, but were actually a slightly above middle of the pack OL in the sec. Return 7 different guys with starting experience including RSR, RSR, RSR, RSR, RSR, RJR, and JR.
On paper, 2025 looks more promising than 2020 did. Was better in 2024 and return even more depth/experience/age overall.