Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

We now have 3 common opponents with t.u.

5,440 Views | 50 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by TyperWoods
houstonaggie76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Vs Arky - +4 t.u. +10
Vs MSU - +10 t.u. +22
Vs Florida - +13 t.u. + 32
HoustonAg2106
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
houstonaggie76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My bad. I didn't realize talking about opponents was not allowed. Let's go back to complaining about the DJ.
McNasty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Definitely not the same UF (QB1 and QB2 vs Ags, QB3 vs horns)
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
houstonaggie76 said:

My bad. I didn't realize talking about opponents was not allowed. Let's go back to complaining about the DJ.



No your post just doesn't have a clear point other than we played 3 common opponents. It's almost like you have an agenda posting the score differentials
World's worst proofreader
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
houstonaggie76 said:

My bad. I didn't realize talking about opponents was not allowed. Let's go back to complaining about the DJ.
No, carry on. We have a 9 f***ing page tu game thread right here on Texags. What's one more sip thread?
OKG2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do score differentials matter in tie breakers?
newbie11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We can beat tu but we prob won't. They're a better more consistent team and their wrs will be a serious match up problem for our secondary. Our O is completely inconsistent and losing Moss hurt us badly.
vbl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I believe that it does.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
newbie11 said:

We can beat tu but we prob won't. They're a better more consistent team and their wrs will be a serious match up problem for our secondary. Our O is completely inconsistent and losing Moss hurt us badly.


Have you watched any of tu's games. Good defenses have shut them down
World's worst proofreader
Hungry Ojos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

newbie11 said:

We can beat tu but we prob won't. They're a better more consistent team and their wrs will be a serious match up problem for our secondary. Our O is completely inconsistent and losing Moss hurt us badly.


Have you watched any of tu's games. Good defenses have shut them down


Do you think we have a "good" defense? Even after a neutered USC offense absolutely back doored us to the tune of forty effing four?
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Hungry Ojos said:

vander54 said:

newbie11 said:

We can beat tu but we prob won't. They're a better more consistent team and their wrs will be a serious match up problem for our secondary. Our O is completely inconsistent and losing Moss hurt us badly.


Have you watched any of tu's games. Good defenses have shut them down


Do you think we have a "good" defense? Even after a neutered USC offense absolutely back doored us to the tune of forty effing four?


Yes we do one game doesn't automatically make us suck.

But as I've stated before it won't stop you from your agenda.
World's worst proofreader
AGDAD14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So we don't stand a chance.
Hungry Ojos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

Hungry Ojos said:

vander54 said:

newbie11 said:

We can beat tu but we prob won't. They're a better more consistent team and their wrs will be a serious match up problem for our secondary. Our O is completely inconsistent and losing Moss hurt us badly.


Have you watched any of tu's games. Good defenses have shut them down


Do you think we have a "good" defense? Even after a neutered USC offense absolutely back doored us to the tune of forty effing four?


Yes we do one game doesn't automatically make us suck.

But as I've stated before it won't stop you from your agenda.


I don't know what you mean by "agenda". I just post opinions based on results. This board is an absolute echo chamber that thinks we're a powerhouse, blue blood when in reality we're not even really all that relevant. I can't understand how we can have like ten top ten recruiting classes in a row and still have no threats at receiver, one serviceable tailback (who is now out), no secondary or a difference maker at QB.
Amarillo Slim
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
houstonaggie76 said:

Vs Arky - +4 t.u. +10
Vs MSU - +10 t.u. +22
Vs Florida - +13 t.u. + 32


None of this matters. We will kick their ass in Kyle field come the 30th
texag101
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

houstonaggie76 said:

My bad. I didn't realize talking about opponents was not allowed. Let's go back to complaining about the DJ.



No your post just doesn't have a clear point other than we played 3 common opponents. It's almost like you have an agenda posting the score differentials
It's almost like you're a sunshine pumper that can't stand anything that remotely suggests texas is good.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
texag101 said:

vander54 said:

houstonaggie76 said:

My bad. I didn't realize talking about opponents was not allowed. Let's go back to complaining about the DJ.



No your post just doesn't have a clear point other than we played 3 common opponents. It's almost like you have an agenda posting the score differentials
It's almost like you're a sunshine pumper that can't stand anything that remotely suggests texas is good.


I'llkeep this up. It's almost like you don't know what i think
World's worst proofreader
spherical
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why is it that folks like you and Maroon Dawn are nowhere to be found during winning streaks?
Hungry Ojos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
spherical said:

Why is it that folks like you and Maroon Dawn are nowhere to be found during winning streaks?


Probably because we don't have very many.
Ian Neff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Op,

Thank you for posting this.

Also, I have found that when people are critical of my comments or posts, it is best to threaten them with violence. Internet violence, that is - which isn't real. But when I tell them -

"I will meet you at the McDonald's on Federalsburg street and punch you in the face.."

They get quiet real fast.

And oh yeah, hungry eyes, your takes are absurd and that song stinks. Dirty Dancing was just all kinds of horrible too.
Hungry Ojos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ian Neff said:

Op,

Thank you for posting this.

Also, I have found that when people are critical of my comments or posts, it is best to threaten them with violence. Internet violence, that is - which isn't real. But when I tell them -

"I will meet you at the McDonald's on Federalsburg street and punch you in the face.."

They get quiet real fast.

And oh yeah, hungry eyes, your takes are absurd and that song stinks. Dirty Dancing was just all kinds of horrible too.
13B
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hungry Ojos said:

vander54 said:

Hungry Ojos said:

vander54 said:

newbie11 said:

We can beat tu but we prob won't. They're a better more consistent team and their wrs will be a serious match up problem for our secondary. Our O is completely inconsistent and losing Moss hurt us badly.


Have you watched any of tu's games. Good defenses have shut them down


Do you think we have a "good" defense? Even after a neutered USC offense absolutely back doored us to the tune of forty effing four?


Yes we do one game doesn't automatically make us suck.

But as I've stated before it won't stop you from your agenda.


I don't know what you mean by "agenda". I just post opinions based on results. This board is an absolute echo chamber that thinks we're a powerhouse, blue blood when in reality 1. we're not even really all that relevant. I can't understand how we can have like ten top ten recruiting classes in a row and still 2. have no threats at receiver, 3. one serviceable tailback (who is now out), no secondary or a difference maker at QB.
Maybe because you make really bad comments like:
1. not relevant? We're tied for the best conference record in the SEC
2. We have a couple threats if we could actually get the ball to them (including TEs in this)
3. calling Moss just a "serviceable" tailback.

or maybe this nugget from another thread re: NMSt: "I think this is going to be a frustrating game. We're not going to lose, but I see like a 17 point win."

Either you are perpetually glum, incapable of seeing positives, trolling constantly or have some sort of agenda.
spherical
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hungry Ojos said:

spherical said:

Why is it that folks like you and Maroon Dawn are nowhere to be found during winning streaks?


Probably because we don't have very many.


Yea… that's uh, probably it.
jriv09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
newbie11 said:

We can beat tu but we prob won't. They're a better more consistent team and their wrs will be a serious match up problem for our secondary. Our O is completely inconsistent and losing Moss hurt us badly.


Maybe you were watching a different game. TU looks horrible offensively. The only thing they do well is misdirection. If your secondary stays home there isn't much to that offense. They are not a good team.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
jriv09 said:

newbie11 said:

We can beat tu but we prob won't. They're a better more consistent team and their wrs will be a serious match up problem for our secondary. Our O is completely inconsistent and losing Moss hurt us badly.


Maybe you were watching a different game. TU looks horrible offensively. The only thing they do well is misdirection. If your secondary stays home there isn't much to that offense. They are not a good team.


Partially right. They are good and they can hurt you but playing discipline D can shut them down.

But they aren't some scary juggernaut
World's worst proofreader
Bill Superman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OPforgot to include the fact that we played their starters while sip got their 3rd stringers.

I like our odds.
jriv09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

jriv09 said:

newbie11 said:

We can beat tu but we prob won't. They're a better more consistent team and their wrs will be a serious match up problem for our secondary. Our O is completely inconsistent and losing Moss hurt us badly.


Maybe you were watching a different game. TU looks horrible offensively. The only thing they do well is misdirection. If your secondary stays home there isn't much to that offense. They are not a good team.


Partially right. They are good and they can hurt you but playing discipline D can shut them down.

But they aren't some scary juggernaut


Let me rephrase. They are no where near as good as what their record says they are. They have great athletes on the outside but are very pedestrian on the interior, in my opinion.
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I don't know what you mean by "agenda". I just post opinions based on results. This board is an absolute echo chamber that thinks we're a powerhouse, blue blood when in reality we're not even really all that relevant.
Lol. We're basically 1 win away from the playoffs in Year 1 of a new coach that had like 30 transfers out and is stuck with a weak injured OL, average QBs, and a lot of 3-stars playing a ton all over. And nobody said we're a powerhouse or a blueblood, you dorky little guy. Your Sips look like ass more than not in Sark's year 5.
StinkyPinky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
vander54 said:

jriv09 said:

newbie11 said:

We can beat tu but we prob won't. They're a better more consistent team and their wrs will be a serious match up problem for our secondary. Our O is completely inconsistent and losing Moss hurt us badly.


Maybe you were watching a different game. TU looks horrible offensively. The only thing they do well is misdirection. If your secondary stays home there isn't much to that offense. They are not a good team.


Partially right. They are good and they can hurt you but playing discipline D can shut them down.

But they aren't some scary juggernaut
This. They're a good team with good talent. But very beatable like every team this year.
Emilio Fantastico
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bill Superman said:

OPforgot to include the fact that we played their starters while sip got their 3rd stringers.

I like our odds.

OP also left out that we played UF and Ms St on the road while they got them at home.
AceAggie05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
McNasty said:

Definitely not the same UF (QB1 and QB2 vs Ags, QB3 vs horns)


Not to mention a true fish at MSU, that started coming into his own before we played them

Or an Arky QB that looked light years different coming back from an injury
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hungry Ojos said:

Let me just give you a courtesy dose of reality. We squeaked by Arky and MSU and got absolutely blown out by the only decent team we've played this year. Your post is so idiotic it wasn't even worth responding to, but no, we are not "basically one win from the playoffs." So in your brilliant opinion if we win tonight we are a lock for the playoffs? Good Lord.

We aren't going to make the playoffs. We aren't going to beat Texas. We probably won't even beat Auburn. Our fan base is so freaking delusional and I have no idea why. Do you understand how embarrassing it is for the rest of us sane Aggies for all you geniuses to talk trash and act like we're relevant, especially to other teams that have done something of substance since Jesus last walked the Earth? It makes us look so incredibly stupid when you guys run your mouths all year, inevitably for us to fall flat on our face…again. There's a reason we are known as Texas 8 & 4. We have literally no skins on the wall whatsoever for our fan base to act like we matter, yet here you are.
Quoted for posterity.
MaroonRevival
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I find it so odd that a fan of another team would waste so much time and energy trolling another fanbase like HO. What is the point? Being a real fan of A&M and being on here is barely defensible. What you're doing is absolutely pathetic. Life is short dude, go outside, make some friends, adopt a stray cat, plant a tree. You'll feel better.
hsjnlssmith89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hungry Ojos said:

Let me just give you a courtesy dose of reality. We squeaked by Arky and MSU and got absolutely blown out by the only decent team we've played this year. Your post is so idiotic it wasn't even worth responding to, but no, we are not "basically one win from the playoffs." So in your brilliant opinion if we win tonight we are a lock for the playoffs? Good Lord.

We aren't going to make the playoffs. We aren't going to beat Texas. We probably won't even beat Auburn. Our fan base is so freaking delusional and I have no idea why. Do you understand how embarrassing it is for the rest of us sane Aggies for all you geniuses to talk trash and act like we're relevant, especially to other teams that have done something of substance since Jesus last walked the Earth? It makes us look so incredibly stupid when you guys run your mouths all year, inevitably for us to fall flat on our face…again. There's a reason we are known as Texas 8 & 4. We have literally no skins on the wall whatsoever for our fan base to act like we matter, yet here you are.


What tough, biting analysis! Sucks to be you!! I'll just continue being my happy Aggie self. Say this in the mornings in front of the mirror; "I love myself, I love myself".
aggiedad7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
McNasty said:

Definitely not the same UF (QB1 and QB2 vs Ags, QB3 vs horns)
QB doesn't account for Florida giving up 350 yds and 35 points at half. Sure not moving the ball hurts your D but you still have to get some stops which they didn't.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.