Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Defensive miscues

5,298 Views | 29 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by GigEmReggie
fav13andac1)c
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Multiple instances of bad defense last night. Perhaps someone with more football knowledge can better explain what's going on here. Please keep in mind there were things we did well, but I feel there were a lot of miscues that can be easily cleaned up with proper coaching. But this is super concerning. I've been accused of being a sunshine pumper, so I hope that lends credibility to the amount of concern there should be over our defensive performance.

Example #1.


Disguised pressure look. Looks like we could be bringing up to 7, you don't know who is coming. Interesting concept, but BG's oline handles it easily and the pocket holds beautifully. But #14 and #1 run into each other in coverage and let their best player, #0, go scot-free on a crosser.

Example #2.


Going to be difficult to stop outside runs when #18 so willingly breaks contain.

Example #3.


The first play out of halftime. #26 and #0 let #0 run a corner route scot-free. They just let him go. This looks like we don't understand zone responsibilities. Honestly we look like Florida's #12 from last week. Lost.

Example #4.


#14 again. Giving way too much cushion in zone and let #0 open yet again. I'm starting to see why Elko was so frustrated after the game.

Example #5.


There were multiple instances of the DLine not reading screen. They run right past the lineman and don't double back. This is high school level stuff.

Example #6. No hustle.


Honestly this reverse is run to perfection. We bite on the lineman blocking down and the QB lays the perfect block. My issue is #8, once he sees the reverse, he jogs after the play and watches #16 score. He takes even a remotely decent angle of pursuit, he could have possibly made the tackle.

Example #7.


We are so lucky this wasn't a touchdown. We all know #0 is the best player on the team, yet we AGAIN let him run by. He was completely forgotten in the endzone. EVERYBODY bit on the run, and didn't see #0. It's like he was a ghost.

Example #8.


Guess who is open again? Yep, #0. With a good throw, he scores here. Don't know what happened with the QB, it's not like we had generated any pressure.

I believe Elko is working on these things and calling them out in film today. Bowling Green is a good football team, and I believe they are better than Florida. But we better come up with some answers in the secondary quickly. Most of the issues seem to be in zone coverage.

Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Example 1 is almost an illegal pick imo. Our corner was covering him but got blocked by our guys.
fav13andac1)c
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Example 1 is almost an illegal pick imo. Our corner was covering him but got blocked by our guys.


The other crosser was already covered. Bryce Anderson just stood there and covered no one.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Play 1 we bring 5. Looks like Bryce was a spy and got in the way of Thomas when BG crossed.
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Play 2 Scooby broke for the line a filled the gap causing the RB to bounce out. The DE lost contain on an interior spin move. Makes me wonder if he wasn't assigned to contain
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Play 3 appears to be a coverage issue. Not sure if Lee was supposed to take the TE or if the outside CB was.
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't see a major issue with play 4. Thomas could have broken a little earlier but wasn't atrocious.
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Play 6 was on Scooby and Lee. Lee went after the blocker and didnt really make a play on the runner
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Play 7 was a trick play and Jones recovered quickly and it would have taken a great throw to complete it. Not likely on that kind of play.
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Play 8 was a zone play and a mismatch.
World's worst proofreader
Johnny Boyziel 2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Get over it. We won. What a sad use of your time on a Sunday.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
On 7, it did trick us but I think we did ok and pressured their back to throw sooner than he wanted.
fav13andac1)c
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

Get over it. We won. What a sad use of your time on a Sunday.


How I choose to spend my time is my prerogative. I enjoy looking at stuff like this. Are we not allowed to have thoughtful football discussions on the Texas A&M Football board?
Definitely Not a Troll
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

Get over it. We won. What a sad use of your time on a Sunday.


I enjoy a little actual football discussion around here instead of the usual threads with people just complaining and adding no value to this board.
Whaler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
On example 8, we were really fortunate the pass was so overthrown.
I was so happy #3 Radcliff got the INT, but at the same time I was wondering why the heck he was 6-7 yards deep in the end zone, with no Bowling Green player anywhere near him.
AggieTrainer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biggest issue I see is we have a DC that doesn't appear to have a great grasp of assignment football. He was a bad hire, and if Elko waits too long to define his tenure, he will eventually define Elko's.
MallalieuAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You would think A&M coaches and players would have been ready against #0. Pathetic.
SABUILDERAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieTrainer said:

Biggest issue I see is we have a DC that doesn't appear to have a great grasp of assignment football. He was a bad hire, and if Elko waits too long to define his tenure, he will eventually define Elko's.
Not trying to contradict you, but what indicates that this is a Bateman issue and not a player issue?

I see a lot from our players that makes me question whether they are playing their assignments, but maybe there is more that I don't see that indicates that this is in fact a coaching issue.
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone in the film room today want to confirm Elko reviewed all seven???
eATMup-Reveille
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Boyziel 2 said:

Get over it. We won. What a sad use of your time on a Sunday.

Yet if we lose, this Poster says will say they can't understand what happened.
AggieTrainer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SABUILDERAG said:

AggieTrainer said:

Biggest issue I see is we have a DC that doesn't appear to have a great grasp of assignment football. He was a bad hire, and if Elko waits too long to define his tenure, he will eventually define Elko's.
Not trying to contradict you, but what indicates that this is a Bateman issue and not a player issue?

I see a lot from our players that makes me question whether they are playing their assignments, but maybe there is more that I don't see that indicates that this is in fact a coaching issue.



Repeatability. If it happens once, I'm fine putting it on the player. This year it's typically happening over and over again. That's a lack of teaching, recognition, awareness, design, preparation, positioning, or evaluation. Whatever it is, it goes back to the DC.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
on the reverse TD...

I guess the lone defender...didn't know he was the lone defender

can't take on the blocker when there is no one to tackle the ballcarrier
fav13andac1)c
How long do you want to ignore this user?
W said:

on the reverse TD...

I guess the lone defender...didn't know he was the lone defender

can't take on the blocker when there is no one to tackle the ballcarrier
I could definitely see that.
Medaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I actually enjoy this more than the constant complaining. if you don't like an actual football discussion, don't read it and go back to complaining about the other 10 things on this board.
Medaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#8 was the most egregious followed by #7.

Any decent QB should have made that throw, he sailed that by 5 feet over the receiver's head. Why the defensive backs were so far in the endzone and leaving the 5 yard area uncovered is mind boggling. I don't know if this is coaching or players but this is the easiest throw he had all game.

#7 was bad because you can't allow the receiver to have a free run into the corner. If the QB pulled it back and made a simple throw into the corner would have been an easy TD.

Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Semi rough day for the defense.

At the end of the day, we put a ton of stuff on film that can be exploited. At the same time, we played a disciplined and experienced team and put a lot on film for our coaches to fix that likely wasn't showing up in practices and scrimmages. Not sure why so many are crapping all over the defense. Up until this game, defense has been rather consistent and pretty decent, though against some bad offenses.

My main worries..

1. D-Line not getting pressure. This in an Elko staple. They play run assignments. I don't think Myles Garrett would have had more than 5-6 sacks in an Elko defense. And so far this year, the right edge of the defense is bad at keeping contain when run fitting has been the exclusive focus. Needs to be fixed FAST.

2. Nickel. Losing Chapelle hurt a lot. Not much experience filling in and having to cover what's usually the shiftiest option. Prone to missed assignments. Also needs to get fixed fast as competition is about to ramp up.

I don't understand the sky is falling posts. The D-line is experienced, but the rest is very young / inexperienced outside of WIll Lee who is likely still learning the new system. I don't mind getting some growing pains out of the way against a team like that in a game we win. But I would like to see them be a lot better Saturday. Most important thing is our starting safety not getting ejected.
"H-A: In return for the flattery, can you reduce the size of your signature? It's the only part of your posts that don't add value. In its' place, just put "I'm an investing savant, and make no apologies for it", as oldarmy1 would do."
- I Bleed Maroon (distracted easily by signatures)
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Medaggie said:

#8 was the most egregious followed by #7.

Any decent QB should have made that throw, he sailed that by 5 feet over the receiver's head. Why the defensive backs were so far in the endzone and leaving the 5 yard area uncovered is mind boggling. I don't know if this is coaching or players but this is the easiest throw he had all game.

#7 was bad because you can't allow the receiver to have a free run into the corner. If the QB pulled it back and made a simple throw into the corner would have been an easy TD.


You call that simple, but we had a free runner of the edge barreling down. To get it off that quick, he would have had to throw without getting set.

That was actually one of the few examples of us getting pressure and forcing the play to break down. There was one option of success, and our pressure on the QB forced the play to take too long and that option closed.
"H-A: In return for the flattery, can you reduce the size of your signature? It's the only part of your posts that don't add value. In its' place, just put "I'm an investing savant, and make no apologies for it", as oldarmy1 would do."
- I Bleed Maroon (distracted easily by signatures)
Medaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Against BG, you can get away with this. Against a better team with a better O-Line and QB, those are easy Tds.

If we did this against a Ga or bama, I would have said the defense played well. But if you have these mistakes against marginal teams, the good teams will have a hayday moving the ball.
GigEmReggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

Play 3 appears to be a coverage issue. Not sure if Lee was supposed to take the TE or if the outside CB was.
super insightful
GigEmReggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's very concerning that we're having coaching issues on defense after hiring a defensive HC. I wonder if Elko is helping coordinate the defense. He should be.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.