Canvasback said:

---

Snitching on the mob could have unintended consequences!

---

Not if it never happened, and you are making the whole thing up. Which this kid certainly is. Even his boys on the podcast are roasting him for how ridiculous it is.

cupofjoe04 said:

---

Canvasback said:

---

Snitching on the mob could have unintended consequences!

---

Not if it never happened, and you are making the whole thing up. Which this kid certainly is. Even his boys on the podcast are roasting him for how ridiculous it is.

---

He might have some mental issues.

Have certain players/officials been on the take in the past? Yes.

Does it still occur? Yes.

But the vast majority of what people think is "fixed" is simply people who can't wrap their heads around that they aren't as good at handicapping sports as they think they are -- they weren't wrong, it's just that the fix was in!

AGinHI said:

---

I don't know about CFB being rigged.

But biased refs with an agenda exist

---

And we just kind of rolled over on this...That game was over, and we know how it all ended.

Shoefly! said:

---

dreyOO said:

---

I don't know, but I can tell you the Big 12 games certainly have some questionable patterns in place.

---

Especially the Cougar sip game in 23.

---

Or Texas tech vs sip in the late nineties. Tech made the first down and the refs said they were short by a full yard.

The fifth down by Colorado. The non calls like holding Texas A&M against auburn. Cam Newton can't play but then does.

There are hundreds more of examples per season.

chlavinka said:

---

UH beat the spread by a wide margin; this take does not hold water.

---

You missed the bigger point- your 'sips were given the GAME! a pending LOSS turned into a WIN

If you're looking for someone to throw a game, you don't call on a Vandy football team.

That's like paying a homeless person to turn down Kate Upton if she proposes marriage.