Since everyone else is throwing out names.
Go ahead, tell me why he would be a bad hire.
Go ahead, tell me why he would be a bad hire.
Hustle Harder
Post Reply
1 of 1
Jamey Chadwell
4,483 Views |
24 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Divining Rod
Same reason I'm adverse to Traylor. Competition level isn't even close to SEC
Undefeated there. Did great at Coastal Carolina before that and Charleston Southern before that.Greetings said:
Good coach; I'm kinda wary of anything coming out of Liberty.
Maybe he is one of those coaches that only does great at small schools though.
Would be nice to get someone hungry and still looking to prove something rather than on the downslope.
Hustle Harder
He's coaching a Freese team
The way I look at it is you either get an up-and-comer with something still left to prove or someone who already accomplished something and is looking for the job to retire at or easy street.Ags2013 said:
Same reason I'm adverse to Traylor. Competition level isn't even close to SEC
Hustle Harder
Well, he's certainly been vetted and passed on in multiple coaching carousels by what we would consider to be "inferior" schools?Quote:
Go ahead, tell me why he would be a bad hire.
So I guess maybe our "search firm" folks would see something…all the rest didn't?
(You don't get passed on with that resume that often unless something doesn't make sense…)
HustlerAggie said:The way I look at it is you either get an up-and-comer with something still left to prove or someone who already accomplished something and is looking for the job to retire at or easy street.Ags2013 said:
Same reason I'm adverse to Traylor. Competition level isn't even close to SEC
username checks out.
Who passed on him?20ag07 said:Well, he's certainly been vetted and passed on in multiple coaching carousels by what we would consider to be "inferior" schools?Quote:
Go ahead, tell me why he would be a bad hire.
So I guess maybe our "search firm" folks would see something…all the rest didn't?
(You don't get passed on with that resume that often unless something doesn't make sense…)
He probably doesn't even want to leave Liberty after only one year anyway.
Hustle Harder
Wikipedia says $4 million/year. Not sure how accurate that is.Greetings said:Liberty does, allegedly, pay exceptionally well.HustlerAggie said:Who passed on him?20ag07 said:Well, he's certainly been vetted and passed on in multiple coaching carousels by what we would consider to be "inferior" schools?Quote:
Go ahead, tell me why he would be a bad hire.
So I guess maybe our "search firm" folks would see something…all the rest didn't?
(You don't get passed on with that resume that often unless something doesn't make sense…)
He probably doesn't even want to leave Liberty after only one year anyway.
Hustle Harder
Ags2013 said:
Same reason I'm adverse to Traylor. Competition level isn't even close to SEC
I don't get how people argue this. A good coach is independent of the conference he's in. Washington's head coach was in the Mountain West. Lanning was a freaking assistant who had never been a HC. Mike Norvell was at an American athletic conference school. I can go on and on
fightintxaggie10 said:Ags2013 said:
Same reason I'm adverse to Traylor. Competition level isn't even close to SEC
I don't get how people argue this. A good coach is independent of the conference he's in. Washington's head coach was in the Mountain West. Lanning was a freaking assistant who had never been a HC. Mike Norvell was at an American athletic conference school. I can go on and on
That's why we're in the position we're in. Aggies have such an inferiority complex we think we need someone from a big conference or school to win. The last coaches after Slocum are from
SEC
NFL
Conference USA
ACC
The coach from Conference USA had the best win %
IMO Chadwell is more likely to end up being the guy than many of the other names being thrown out.
My posts are "... based on limited information, type casting and speculation."
I liked Chadwell at Coastal and he had Grayson McCall looking like an NFL QB (won't watch Liberty for Liberty reasons), but I'm wary of offensive gurus who run a unique system like he does… is there another pitch in that toolbox?
The short answer is no. You've got to have some kind of SEC connection or experience. We are in a different league and Liberty to A&M without ever having coached in the SEC is a no.
You're a week late - https://texags.com/forums/5/topics/3416796/replies/66119548
Chadwell needs to be on the list. He won't be cheap, but we need to find the next DeBoer instead of hiring DeBoer. As I don't think DeBoer leaves UW so soon, especially since his daughter just signed to play softball there. Besides, it would be nice to see DeBoer/UW without Pennix - which we don't have that luxury.
Chadwell needs to be on the list. He won't be cheap, but we need to find the next DeBoer instead of hiring DeBoer. As I don't think DeBoer leaves UW so soon, especially since his daughter just signed to play softball there. Besides, it would be nice to see DeBoer/UW without Pennix - which we don't have that luxury.
This "has to have an SEC connection" is mind boggling to me.85AustinAg said:
The short answer is no. You've got to have some kind of SEC connection or experience. We are in a different league and Liberty to A&M without ever having coached in the SEC is a no.
Hustle Harder
HustlerAggie said:This "has to have an SEC connection" is mind boggling to me.85AustinAg said:
The short answer is no. You've got to have some kind of SEC connection or experience. We are in a different league and Liberty to A&M without ever having coached in the SEC is a no.
Agreed. Why do we handcuff ourselves with such stupid requirements?
Only downside I can see is that Chadwell is represented by Sexton.
DeBoer is represented by Juan Lozano.
DeBoer is represented by Juan Lozano.
Quote:
Go ahead, tell me why he would be a bad hire.
Because I've never heard of him
Divining Rod said:Quote:
Go ahead, tell me why he would be a bad hire.
Because I've never heard of him
That's exactly why we should hire him. We struck out with all the big names.
We need a guy in his mid-40s who wants to be a big name. Not an over the hill coach who wants to get rich, fat, & lazy.
jt16 said:fightintxaggie10 said:Ags2013 said:
Same reason I'm adverse to Traylor. Competition level isn't even close to SEC
I don't get how people argue this. A good coach is independent of the conference he's in. Washington's head coach was in the Mountain West. Lanning was a freaking assistant who had never been a HC. Mike Norvell was at an American athletic conference school. I can go on and on
That's why we're in the position we're in. Aggies have such an inferiority complex we think we need someone from a big conference or school to win. The last coaches after Slocum are from
SEC
NFL
Conference USA
ACC
The coach from Conference USA had the best win %
The coach from Conf USA got to ride the JFF lightning with Sherman's team for two years, then fell on his face when he actually had to goto work.
I'm actually with you on that. i was just having fun. Also, I'm a big believer in a very small guarantee contract, with generous allowances for top coordinators and very big payouts for results. A successful coach, and one who knows he will succeed, will not be worried about moving on from A&M up the ladder, or worried about his job security.dBoy99 said:Divining Rod said:Quote:
Go ahead, tell me why he would be a bad hire.
Because I've never heard of him
That's exactly why we should hire him. We struck out with all the big names.
We need a guy in his mid-40s who wants to be a big name. Not an over the hill coach who wants to get rich, fat, & lazy.
Featured Stories
See All
10:14
2d ago
9.2k
Zach Clemence leads Texas A&M's 3-point barrage vs. South Carolina
by Olin Buchanan
5 Thoughts: Texas A&M 92, South Carolina 69
by Luke Evangelist
7:55
15h ago
2.4k
Aggies extend scholarship offer to 2027 DeSoto RB SaRod Baker
by Jason Howell
5:03
2d ago
2.5k
Game Highlights: Texas A&M 92, South Carolina 69
by Reece Nygren