Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Weigman update

10,207 Views | 39 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by livinmw
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jbob04 said:

My eyes tell me differently. Same offense we've seen since Jim got here and it's nothing like what Petrino has always ran.
Which is exactly what someone who is pretty dang good with studying and analyzing film warned us about with regards to Petrino.

That the average fan wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

It's his offense. Fisher does help with the game planning. But you are seeing very close to the same thing you'd see if you turned on Missouri State last year in terms of play designs, concepts, and calls in certain situations.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ugly said:

Jbob04 said:

My eyes tell me differently. Same offense we've seen since Jim got here and it's nothing like what Petrino has always ran.
That's what I just said. Same playbook, same committee deciding plays, same approach to calling plays. The difference is Petrino having a voice on the committee vs. our previous OC and Petrino is the one reading the sheet and physically calling the plays rather than Jimbo. That is it.
Which is all the same concepts at Petrino at his previous stops. Same offensive system. Same play designs.

Just a different approach in how they teach it and call it.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

I don't know why some of you keep claiming that Conner didn't play well against Miami. Maybe because someone else said it and you decided to repeat it?

He had a good game.

We scored 33 points.

Defense was the problem, not Conner.
Yep, we threw for 337. With Ainais slipping. With a blitzer in his face all game. With Evan not cutting up field. With a bad drop. With Amari fumbling on 4th and 1 ending a possession.

Conner is damn good. Almost masks most of the deficiencies of the west coast in today's game. Almost. Conner himself was good enough for 50+ in that game with a solid offensive scheme and personnel around him.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie1188 said:

Ugly said:

Jbob04 said:

My eyes tell me differently. Same offense we've seen since Jim got here and it's nothing like what Petrino has always ran.
That's what I just said. Same playbook, same committee deciding plays, same approach to calling plays. The difference is Petrino having a voice on the committee vs. our previous OC and Petrino is the one reading the sheet and physically calling the plays rather than Jimbo. That is it.
And every opposing coach we play says our offense is basically like every Jimbo offense in their press conferences.
And they would say the same about Petrino offenses. They run the same system. This was well known before he got here. That's part of the reason Jimbo went with him. Familiarity in what each other wants to do.

Petrino implements it and call things differently at times. But the play designs, concepts, etc., are virtually identical. Petrino tends to reduce the playbook over time to what his teams execute the best (which right now, isn't much). Fisher hammers home everything in the theory that if executed, it will work. But they draw from all the same designs and concepts.
livinmw
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OP, I didn't think this was a question, last I heard, correct me if I am wrong but I thought Looch made it clear that he is done for the season? Or, did I miss an update since that time where they have come back and said he might be expected to return before season's end? You have my attention
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.