1. King
2. Johnson
3. Weigman

You're out on a limb.

QB1 has been named...its King, team has been told

Stowers (the runner), Bost (the passer) rotate. Weigman comes in late. Johnson on bench talking to his brother about him transferring. King clipboard

I think TexAgs should permaban anyone who thinks they are so important that they need to start a new thread discussing the same damn thing as the other 97 threads pertaining to the same topic.

But that's just me

Eso si, Que es said:

---

I think TexAgs should permaban anyone who thinks they are so important that they need to start a new thread discussing the same damn thing as the other 97 threads pertaining to the same topic.

But that's just me

---

But what do you think?

Source

Eso si, Que es said:

---

I think TexAgs should permaban anyone who thinks they are so important that they need to start a new thread discussing the same damn thing as the other 97 threads pertaining to the same topic.

But that's just me

---

So… 98 permabans for the most interesting off-season topic. Is this part of your business model?

Bill Superman said:

---

Eso si, Que es said:

---

I think TexAgs should permaban anyone who thinks they are so important that they need to start a new thread discussing the same damn thing as the other 97 threads pertaining to the same topic.

But that's just me

---

So… 98 permabans for the most interesting off-season topic. Is this part of your business model?

---

nope, just about 3 or 4 permabans, and then we would have one consolidated and concise thread discussing the quarterback prospects.

I just don't get why people think they are so damn important that their opinion of:

1. King
2. Johnson
3. CW

is so different and insightful from the 18,438 other people who think the same thing and warrants another thread to ask, "hey look at me, I'm a peacock and must be admired, what do you think of my completely non-unique and unresearched quarterback ranking".

These people don't even bring some kind of published article, statistics, or other unique piece of information, and there is no reason they need to start a thread asking people for feedback on their regurgitated thoughts.

Eso si, Que es said:

---

Bill Superman said:

---

Eso si, Que es said:

---

I think TexAgs should permaban anyone who thinks they are so important that they need to start a new thread discussing the same damn thing as the other 97 threads pertaining to the same topic.

But that's just me

---

So… 98 permabans for the most interesting off-season topic. Is this part of your business model?

---

nope, just about 3 or 4 permabans, and then we would have one consolidated and concise thread discussing the quarterback prospects.

I just don't get why people think they are so damn important that their opinion of:

1. King
2. Johnson
3. CW

is so different and insightful from the 18,438 other people who think the same thing and warrants another thread to ask, "hey look at me, I'm a peacock and must be admired, what do you think of my completely non-unique and unresearched quarterback ranking".

These people don't even bring some kind of published article, statistics, or other unique piece of information, and there is no reason they need to start a thread asking people for feedback on their regurgitated thoughts.

---

Maybe you should make a thread about this then.

Et tu, Yaloo???

I'd like to see us hold open tryouts, large student body should be able to find some ringers

Well, there was a deleted thread recently where the OP wondered why there was no meltdown here despite the team choosing King as the QB1 this afternoon.

Pretty sure it's an elaborate troll, but take it with a grain of salt.

Did you just rank them by the length of their last name?!? Try harder, damnit!

It was not a troll, I don't know why my thread was nuked.

My prediction is quartback play will be the reason we arent in the playoffs

Bronco6G said:

---

It was not a troll, I don't know why my thread was nuked.

---

Perhaps it really wasn't.

I think the writing is already on the wall at this point: King is QB1. But, it'll be funny af to see the Weigman fanboys melt down after the 1,000,000 threads over the summer about how he will transfer if he isn't QB1

It's time for the Ag's to go Max Johnson!

I definitely think the Aggies will have a QB playing this season.

My prediction is the QB will both throw and run, but more likely pass more than run

I think the QB will throw both TDs and INTs and more TDs than INTs

I think the QB will win some games, but also will lose a game or two.

I believe the QB will be a student at Texas A&M, but will likely take a light load.

I think the QB will have an NIL deal.

Well it appears my prediction on who Jimbo would go with as qb1 was wrong. I thought he would go with Max, because he would feel he would make the least mistakes. Apparently it's Haynes. I gotta trust Jimbo.

Coach better give Max some PT. This first game is the time to see what they got.

Sorry haven't been dialed in all summer, and didn't want to post a new thread, but when did Weigman fall out of contention?

Going into spring practice, there was all the talk about Weigman having a shot at starting, and it seems as of late it's a 2 horse race between King and Johnson.

Is this just based on practice and Weigman not getting the 1st team reps, or why does pretty much everyone think Weigman is not in the running?

Because he practiced with the 3's all fall

jja79 said:

---

You're out on a limb.

---

The ice is thin where he's skating