DonaldJTrump said:

---

BJC said:

---

Ag in Tiger Country said:

---

BJC said:

---

Jimbo4win said:

---

Harry Lime said:

---

Jimbo4win said:

---

Riddle me this..what happens to a girl if she pushes a guy, bites him and tries to gouge his eyes with her fingernails? Let's say the guy does nothing about it and then tells police. Will she be treated the same as a guy in the court of law? I KNOW for a FACT she won't be treated the same in the court of public opinion.

---

Women can and do get arrested and charged for domestic violence. This is not a groundbreaking hypothetical you've thrown out there.

---

The point being…MANY on this forum have the opinion that women are sweet and innocent. Perhaps they grew up in rural areas. Perhaps times were different when they were dating. My experience and the experience of MANY of my guy friends is that LOTS of women of today get pissed and initiate contact, often violently. Often times alcohol or drugs may be involved and maybe the guy did something stupid(let a girl find out you've been cheating on her and see what she is capable of). When it happens, they have ALL of the rage and they are fighting to win whereas the guy is caught in an incredibly difficult no win situation. She is fighting to win and he is simply not trying to lose so to speak. Now, imagine a girl biting, choking, gouging eyes/mouth, kicking, slapping come at you and see how you respond after she gets two or three solid legit contacts in..girls of today know they can get away with that behavior and often times in a relationship, they do it MULTIPLE times and the if the guy ever makes one wrong move(even simply pushes her away). he is toast!

To bring it back to football, many on here had NOTHING to say when JFF slapped Colleen Crowley in the head for trying to leave his car. Why was that? Could it be because JFF produced whereas Demas hasn't done s***?

---

As a Gen-Xer late fortysomething black man I was born in a small town and grew up in a nearby rural community no further than 30 miles from Texas A&M. As a boy I too was raised up to be a "gentleman" (like many others here) towards females up to the point of putting them on a pedestal. Before you call me "woke", do keep in mind that I am not that; I am just "aware" of how some women are.

Although well-intentioned at first, I found out years later that being a "gentleman" was in fact disrespectful towards women because they too are human beings that can talk, think, feel, believe, etc., just like men can. I too was taught to not fight women but when I witnessed what they can do to men I started to see them as equals in many things (we have to realize that not every woman is a "lady" as told to me by my late female cousin, may she RIP). As a boy and a young man I remember the old men telling belligerent women "Do not put yourself in a man's place", which is a warning men tell to women who are positioning themselves as a threat to a man. Many men who underestimating the threat of a belligerent woman have been hurt, injured, maimed, disabled, or killed after suffering a woman's attack.

In my youth I too have unfortunately witnessed men physically abusing their girlfriends and I have also unfortunately witnessed women physically abusing their boyfriends as well; in each case I have seen law enforcement called to the scene to address the domestic abuse.

Regarding this saga, it would be best for us here to let the legal system go through the process to see who is guilty and who is innocent. Pointing fingers and making blanket statements may not do us any favors in the case that potential recruits are looking at this site.

---

Let me join the circle-jerk of attorneys pontificating towards others and respectfully suggest YOU (as a forty-something Black man) park that notion about treating a woman equally in an incident, including domestic ones; you see, while I agree with dang-near everything you wrote, you have overlooked the cunningness of a female "victim." While their whole life wasn't lived as a "lady", when they are sitting on a victim's seat at the police station or in a witness stand, they get to enjoy a blank slate since society can't help themselves but to lend a sympathetic ear.

SO, should you ever physically strike a female but argue equality as a justification, the audience is more sympathetic to a female who can easily & conveniently embrace those inequalities that conferred an actual &/or perceived advantage enjoyed by you. AND, if your victim is an 18 yr-old White sorority brat, then as a forty-something Black man, you're ****ED!

---

Ag in Tiger Country,

You condescendingly speak to me, a Gen-X late-fortysomething black man, as if I am some idealistic woke millennial/Gen-Zer regarding the phenomenon of unaccountable female criminals . Did it ever occur to you that when I made that post that I have already taken that phenomenon into account?

Contrary to your assumption of my alleged naivete, I too have seen with my own eyes the tendency of the authorities to be more sympathetic towards female victims of domestic abuse but I have also seen women aggressors being arrested for assaulting male victims of domestic abuse as well despite their attempt to plead their female privilege to avoid being held accountable for their physical abuse towards the male...

You may be wondering how did that happen?

Simple, due to EVIDENCE...

---

You're black? Who gives a *****

---

Username checks out. I think he's trying to give you context for his perspective. Ease up buddy

I'm hearing Stephen A Smith in my cranium as I traverse the verbage of some of these pontifications in the written word format here upon this very thread.

Loyalty said:

---

HtownWilly12 said:

---

DonaldJTrump said:

---

BJC said:

---

Ag in Tiger Country said:

---

BJC said:

---

Jimbo4win said:

---

Harry Lime said:

---

Jimbo4win said:

---

Riddle me this..what happens to a girl if she pushes a guy, bites him and tries to gouge his eyes with her fingernails? Let's say the guy does nothing about it and then tells police. Will she be treated the same as a guy in the court of law? I KNOW for a FACT she won't be treated the same in the court of public opinion.

---

Women can and do get arrested and charged for domestic violence. This is not a groundbreaking hypothetical you've thrown out there.

---

The point being…MANY on this forum have the opinion that women are sweet and innocent. Perhaps they grew up in rural areas. Perhaps times were different when they were dating. My experience and the experience of MANY of my guy friends is that LOTS of women of today get pissed and initiate contact, often violently. Often times alcohol or drugs may be involved and maybe the guy did something stupid(let a girl find out you've been cheating on her and see what she is capable of). When it happens, they have ALL of the rage and they are fighting to win whereas the guy is caught in an incredibly difficult no win situation. She is fighting to win and he is simply not trying to lose so to speak. Now, imagine a girl biting, choking, gouging eyes/mouth, kicking, slapping come at you and see how you respond after she gets two or three solid legit contacts in..girls of today know they can get away with that behavior and often times in a relationship, they do it MULTIPLE times and the if the guy ever makes one wrong move(even simply pushes her away). he is toast!

To bring it back to football, many on here had NOTHING to say when JFF slapped Colleen Crowley in the head for trying to leave his car. Why was that? Could it be because JFF produced whereas Demas hasn't done s***?

---

As a Gen-Xer late fortysomething black man I was born in a small town and grew up in a nearby rural community no further than 30 miles from Texas A&M. As a boy I too was raised up to be a "gentleman" (like many others here) towards females up to the point of putting them on a pedestal. Before you call me "woke", do keep in mind that I am not that; I am just "aware" of how some women are.

Although well-intentioned at first, I found out years later that being a "gentleman" was in fact disrespectful towards women because they too are human beings that can talk, think, feel, believe, etc., just like men can. I too was taught to not fight women but when I witnessed what they can do to men I started to see them as equals in many things (we have to realize that not every woman is a "lady" as told to me by my late female cousin, may she RIP). As a boy and a young man I remember the old men telling belligerent women "Do not put yourself in a man's place", which is a warning men tell to women who are positioning themselves as a threat to a man. Many men who underestimating the threat of a belligerent woman have been hurt, injured, maimed, disabled, or killed after suffering a woman's attack.

In my youth I too have unfortunately witnessed men physically abusing their girlfriends and I have also unfortunately witnessed women physically abusing their boyfriends as well; in each case I have seen law enforcement called to the scene to address the domestic abuse.

Regarding this saga, it would be best for us here to let the legal system go through the process to see who is guilty and who is innocent. Pointing fingers and making blanket statements may not do us any favors in the case that potential recruits are looking at this site.

---

Let me join the circle-jerk of attorneys pontificating towards others and respectfully suggest YOU (as a forty-something Black man) park that notion about treating a woman equally in an incident, including domestic ones; you see, while I agree with dang-near everything you wrote, you have overlooked the cunningness of a female "victim." While their whole life wasn't lived as a "lady", when they are sitting on a victim's seat at the police station or in a witness stand, they get to enjoy a blank slate since society can't help themselves but to lend a sympathetic ear.

SO, should you ever physically strike a female but argue equality as a justification, the audience is more sympathetic to a female who can easily & conveniently embrace those inequalities that conferred an actual &/or perceived advantage enjoyed by you. AND, if your victim is an 18 yr-old White sorority brat, then as a forty-something Black man, you're ****ED!

---

Ag in Tiger Country,

You condescendingly speak to me, a Gen-X late-fortysomething black man, as if I am some idealistic woke millennial/Gen-Zer regarding the phenomenon of unaccountable female criminals . Did it ever occur to you that when I made that post that I have already taken that phenomenon into account?

Contrary to your assumption of my alleged naivete, I too have seen with my own eyes the tendency of the authorities to be more sympathetic towards female victims of domestic abuse but I have also seen women aggressors being arrested for assaulting male victims of domestic abuse as well despite their attempt to plead their female privilege to avoid being held accountable for their physical abuse towards the male...

You may be wondering how did that happen?

Simple, due to EVIDENCE...

---

You're black? Who gives a *****

---

Username checks out. I think he's trying to give you context for his perspective. Ease up buddy

---

"Username checks out" because of his comment and his name is Donald J Trump? Dumb.

If his name were "S#%t for brains Biden" your response would be much more accurate given the true history of the Democratic Party.

---

That's literally how that Username checks out line/joke works. Welcome to texags

HtownWilly12 said:

---

DonaldJTrump said:

---

BJC said:

---

Ag in Tiger Country said:

---

BJC said:

---

Jimbo4win said:

---

Harry Lime said:

---

Jimbo4win said:

---

Riddle me this..what happens to a girl if she pushes a guy, bites him and tries to gouge his eyes with her fingernails? Let's say the guy does nothing about it and then tells police. Will she be treated the same as a guy in the court of law? I KNOW for a FACT she won't be treated the same in the court of public opinion.

---

Women can and do get arrested and charged for domestic violence. This is not a groundbreaking hypothetical you've thrown out there.

---

The point being…MANY on this forum have the opinion that women are sweet and innocent. Perhaps they grew up in rural areas. Perhaps times were different when they were dating. My experience and the experience of MANY of my guy friends is that LOTS of women of today get pissed and initiate contact, often violently. Often times alcohol or drugs may be involved and maybe the guy did something stupid(let a girl find out you've been cheating on her and see what she is capable of). When it happens, they have ALL of the rage and they are fighting to win whereas the guy is caught in an incredibly difficult no win situation. She is fighting to win and he is simply not trying to lose so to speak. Now, imagine a girl biting, choking, gouging eyes/mouth, kicking, slapping come at you and see how you respond after she gets two or three solid legit contacts in..girls of today know they can get away with that behavior and often times in a relationship, they do it MULTIPLE times and the if the guy ever makes one wrong move(even simply pushes her away). he is toast!

To bring it back to football, many on here had NOTHING to say when JFF slapped Colleen Crowley in the head for trying to leave his car. Why was that? Could it be because JFF produced whereas Demas hasn't done s***?

---

As a Gen-Xer late fortysomething black man I was born in a small town and grew up in a nearby rural community no further than 30 miles from Texas A&M. As a boy I too was raised up to be a "gentleman" (like many others here) towards females up to the point of putting them on a pedestal. Before you call me "woke", do keep in mind that I am not that; I am just "aware" of how some women are.

Although well-intentioned at first, I found out years later that being a "gentleman" was in fact disrespectful towards women because they too are human beings that can talk, think, feel, believe, etc., just like men can. I too was taught to not fight women but when I witnessed what they can do to men I started to see them as equals in many things (we have to realize that not every woman is a "lady" as told to me by my late female cousin, may she RIP). As a boy and a young man I remember the old men telling belligerent women "Do not put yourself in a man's place", which is a warning men tell to women who are positioning themselves as a threat to a man. Many men who underestimating the threat of a belligerent woman have been hurt, injured, maimed, disabled, or killed after suffering a woman's attack.

In my youth I too have unfortunately witnessed men physically abusing their girlfriends and I have also unfortunately witnessed women physically abusing their boyfriends as well; in each case I have seen law enforcement called to the scene to address the domestic abuse.

Regarding this saga, it would be best for us here to let the legal system go through the process to see who is guilty and who is innocent. Pointing fingers and making blanket statements may not do us any favors in the case that potential recruits are looking at this site.

---

Let me join the circle-jerk of attorneys pontificating towards others and respectfully suggest YOU (as a forty-something Black man) park that notion about treating a woman equally in an incident, including domestic ones; you see, while I agree with dang-near everything you wrote, you have overlooked the cunningness of a female "victim." While their whole life wasn't lived as a "lady", when they are sitting on a victim's seat at the police station or in a witness stand, they get to enjoy a blank slate since society can't help themselves but to lend a sympathetic ear.

SO, should you ever physically strike a female but argue equality as a justification, the audience is more sympathetic to a female who can easily & conveniently embrace those inequalities that conferred an actual &/or perceived advantage enjoyed by you. AND, if your victim is an 18 yr-old White sorority brat, then as a forty-something Black man, you're ****ED!

---

Ag in Tiger Country,

You condescendingly speak to me, a Gen-X late-fortysomething black man, as if I am some idealistic woke millennial/Gen-Zer regarding the phenomenon of unaccountable female criminals . Did it ever occur to you that when I made that post that I have already taken that phenomenon into account?

Contrary to your assumption of my alleged naivete, I too have seen with my own eyes the tendency of the authorities to be more sympathetic towards female victims of domestic abuse but I have also seen women aggressors being arrested for assaulting male victims of domestic abuse as well despite their attempt to plead their female privilege to avoid being held accountable for their physical abuse towards the male...

You may be wondering how did that happen?

Simple, due to EVIDENCE...

---

You're black? Who gives a *****

---

Username checks out. I think he's trying to give you context for his perspective. Ease up buddy

---

It seemed to be for context the first time he mentioned it, but it read a bit differently the second time, even if that wasn't the intent.

HtownWilly12 said:

---

Loyalty said:

---

HtownWilly12 said:

---

DonaldJTrump said:

---

BJC said:

---

Ag in Tiger Country said:

---

BJC said:

---

Jimbo4win said:

---

Harry Lime said:

---

Jimbo4win said:

---

Riddle me this..what happens to a girl if she pushes a guy, bites him and tries to gouge his eyes with her fingernails? Let's say the guy does nothing about it and then tells police. Will she be treated the same as a guy in the court of law? I KNOW for a FACT she won't be treated the same in the court of public opinion.

---

Women can and do get arrested and charged for domestic violence. This is not a groundbreaking hypothetical you've thrown out there.

---

The point being…MANY on this forum have the opinion that women are sweet and innocent. Perhaps they grew up in rural areas. Perhaps times were different when they were dating. My experience and the experience of MANY of my guy friends is that LOTS of women of today get pissed and initiate contact, often violently. Often times alcohol or drugs may be involved and maybe the guy did something stupid(let a girl find out you've been cheating on her and see what she is capable of). When it happens, they have ALL of the rage and they are fighting to win whereas the guy is caught in an incredibly difficult no win situation. She is fighting to win and he is simply not trying to lose so to speak. Now, imagine a girl biting, choking, gouging eyes/mouth, kicking, slapping come at you and see how you respond after she gets two or three solid legit contacts in..girls of today know they can get away with that behavior and often times in a relationship, they do it MULTIPLE times and the if the guy ever makes one wrong move(even simply pushes her away). he is toast!

To bring it back to football, many on here had NOTHING to say when JFF slapped Colleen Crowley in the head for trying to leave his car. Why was that? Could it be because JFF produced whereas Demas hasn't done s***?

---

As a Gen-Xer late fortysomething black man I was born in a small town and grew up in a nearby rural community no further than 30 miles from Texas A&M. As a boy I too was raised up to be a "gentleman" (like many others here) towards females up to the point of putting them on a pedestal. Before you call me "woke", do keep in mind that I am not that; I am just "aware" of how some women are.

Although well-intentioned at first, I found out years later that being a "gentleman" was in fact disrespectful towards women because they too are human beings that can talk, think, feel, believe, etc., just like men can. I too was taught to not fight women but when I witnessed what they can do to men I started to see them as equals in many things (we have to realize that not every woman is a "lady" as told to me by my late female cousin, may she RIP). As a boy and a young man I remember the old men telling belligerent women "Do not put yourself in a man's place", which is a warning men tell to women who are positioning themselves as a threat to a man. Many men who underestimating the threat of a belligerent woman have been hurt, injured, maimed, disabled, or killed after suffering a woman's attack.

In my youth I too have unfortunately witnessed men physically abusing their girlfriends and I have also unfortunately witnessed women physically abusing their boyfriends as well; in each case I have seen law enforcement called to the scene to address the domestic abuse.

Regarding this saga, it would be best for us here to let the legal system go through the process to see who is guilty and who is innocent. Pointing fingers and making blanket statements may not do us any favors in the case that potential recruits are looking at this site.

---

Let me join the circle-jerk of attorneys pontificating towards others and respectfully suggest YOU (as a forty-something Black man) park that notion about treating a woman equally in an incident, including domestic ones; you see, while I agree with dang-near everything you wrote, you have overlooked the cunningness of a female "victim." While their whole life wasn't lived as a "lady", when they are sitting on a victim's seat at the police station or in a witness stand, they get to enjoy a blank slate since society can't help themselves but to lend a sympathetic ear.

SO, should you ever physically strike a female but argue equality as a justification, the audience is more sympathetic to a female who can easily & conveniently embrace those inequalities that conferred an actual &/or perceived advantage enjoyed by you. AND, if your victim is an 18 yr-old White sorority brat, then as a forty-something Black man, you're ****ED!

---

Ag in Tiger Country,

You condescendingly speak to me, a Gen-X late-fortysomething black man, as if I am some idealistic woke millennial/Gen-Zer regarding the phenomenon of unaccountable female criminals . Did it ever occur to you that when I made that post that I have already taken that phenomenon into account?

Contrary to your assumption of my alleged naivete, I too have seen with my own eyes the tendency of the authorities to be more sympathetic towards female victims of domestic abuse but I have also seen women aggressors being arrested for assaulting male victims of domestic abuse as well despite their attempt to plead their female privilege to avoid being held accountable for their physical abuse towards the male...

You may be wondering how did that happen?

Simple, due to EVIDENCE...

---

You're black? Who gives a *****

---

Username checks out. I think he's trying to give you context for his perspective. Ease up buddy

---

"Username checks out" because of his comment and his name is Donald J Trump? Dumb.

If his name were "S#%t for brains Biden" your response would be much more accurate given the true history of the Democratic Party.

---

That's literally how that Username checks out line/joke works. Welcome to texags

---

Riiiight lol.

DonaldJTrump said:

---

BJC said:

---

Ag in Tiger Country said:

---

BJC said:

---

Jimbo4win said:

---

Harry Lime said:

---

Jimbo4win said:

---

Riddle me this..what happens to a girl if she pushes a guy, bites him and tries to gouge his eyes with her fingernails? Let's say the guy does nothing about it and then tells police. Will she be treated the same as a guy in the court of law? I KNOW for a FACT she won't be treated the same in the court of public opinion.

---

Women can and do get arrested and charged for domestic violence. This is not a groundbreaking hypothetical you've thrown out there.

---

The point being…MANY on this forum have the opinion that women are sweet and innocent. Perhaps they grew up in rural areas. Perhaps times were different when they were dating. My experience and the experience of MANY of my guy friends is that LOTS of women of today get pissed and initiate contact, often violently. Often times alcohol or drugs may be involved and maybe the guy did something stupid(let a girl find out you've been cheating on her and see what she is capable of). When it happens, they have ALL of the rage and they are fighting to win whereas the guy is caught in an incredibly difficult no win situation. She is fighting to win and he is simply not trying to lose so to speak. Now, imagine a girl biting, choking, gouging eyes/mouth, kicking, slapping come at you and see how you respond after she gets two or three solid legit contacts in..girls of today know they can get away with that behavior and often times in a relationship, they do it MULTIPLE times and the if the guy ever makes one wrong move(even simply pushes her away). he is toast!

To bring it back to football, many on here had NOTHING to say when JFF slapped Colleen Crowley in the head for trying to leave his car. Why was that? Could it be because JFF produced whereas Demas hasn't done s***?

---

As a Gen-Xer late fortysomething black man I was born in a small town and grew up in a nearby rural community no further than 30 miles from Texas A&M. As a boy I too was raised up to be a "gentleman" (like many others here) towards females up to the point of putting them on a pedestal. Before you call me "woke", do keep in mind that I am not that; I am just "aware" of how some women are.

Although well-intentioned at first, I found out years later that being a "gentleman" was in fact disrespectful towards women because they too are human beings that can talk, think, feel, believe, etc., just like men can. I too was taught to not fight women but when I witnessed what they can do to men I started to see them as equals in many things (we have to realize that not every woman is a "lady" as told to me by my late female cousin, may she RIP). As a boy and a young man I remember the old men telling belligerent women "Do not put yourself in a man's place", which is a warning men tell to women who are positioning themselves as a threat to a man. Many men who underestimating the threat of a belligerent woman have been hurt, injured, maimed, disabled, or killed after suffering a woman's attack.

In my youth I too have unfortunately witnessed men physically abusing their girlfriends and I have also unfortunately witnessed women physically abusing their boyfriends as well; in each case I have seen law enforcement called to the scene to address the domestic abuse.

Regarding this saga, it would be best for us here to let the legal system go through the process to see who is guilty and who is innocent. Pointing fingers and making blanket statements may not do us any favors in the case that potential recruits are looking at this site.

---

Let me join the circle-jerk of attorneys pontificating towards others and respectfully suggest YOU (as a forty-something Black man) park that notion about treating a woman equally in an incident, including domestic ones; you see, while I agree with dang-near everything you wrote, you have overlooked the cunningness of a female "victim." While their whole life wasn't lived as a "lady", when they are sitting on a victim's seat at the police station or in a witness stand, they get to enjoy a blank slate since society can't help themselves but to lend a sympathetic ear.

SO, should you ever physically strike a female but argue equality as a justification, the audience is more sympathetic to a female who can easily & conveniently embrace those inequalities that conferred an actual &/or perceived advantage enjoyed by you. AND, if your victim is an 18 yr-old White sorority brat, then as a forty-something Black man, you're ****ED!

---

Ag in Tiger Country,

You condescendingly speak to me, a Gen-X late-fortysomething black man, as if I am some idealistic woke millennial/Gen-Zer regarding the phenomenon of unaccountable female criminals . Did it ever occur to you that when I made that post that I have already taken that phenomenon into account?

Contrary to your assumption of my alleged naivete, I too have seen with my own eyes the tendency of the authorities to be more sympathetic towards female victims of domestic abuse but I have also seen women aggressors being arrested for assaulting male victims of domestic abuse as well despite their attempt to plead their female privilege to avoid being held accountable for their physical abuse towards the male...

You may be wondering how did that happen?

Simple, due to EVIDENCE...

---

You're black? Who gives a *****

---

You must be either...Donald J. Trump, Sr.; Donald J. Trump, Jr.; or Donald J. Trump III....either way, I do not care to value your deflective input.

That being said, I also do not care to value the deflective input of Joseph R. Biden, Jr.

12thMan9 said:

---

aggieclay said:

---

It's amazing how FU***** stupid some punks can be! Guy had the world at his feet. Great recruit, great ambassador of the university, was developing after missing his senior yr of high school getting better and better, but decided he didn't want all that fortune and fame!! WOW!! Biggest bust in A&M history, by FAR.

---

Uhhh, Jorrie Adam's on line 1, Lance Pavlas on line 2,
Kelvin Flood on line 3, Anthony Lewis on line 4, Rod Davis on line 5, Lawrence Mitchell on line 6. Switchboard ran out of lines.....

---

don't think pavlas ranks anywhere near that high. guy did make some contribution. maybe replace with trent driver.

As far as biggest busts...Ken Hall sez remember me?

Nothing a good ol' fashioned jury nullification can't fix

12thMan9 said:

---

aggieclay said:

---

It's amazing how FU***** stupid some punks can be! Guy had the world at his feet. Great recruit, great ambassador of the university, was developing after missing his senior yr of high school getting better and better, but decided he didn't want all that fortune and fame!! WOW!! Biggest bust in A&M history, by FAR.

---

Uhhh, Jorrie Adam's on line 1, Lance Pavlas on line 2,
Kelvin Flood on line 3, Anthony Lewis on line 4, Rod Davis on line 5, Lawrence Mitchell on line 6. Switchboard ran out of lines.....

---

Speedy Noil is operating the switch board.. but I think he's out on a smoke break.

" I found out years later that being a "gentleman" was in fact disrespectful towards women because they too are human beings that can talk, think, feel, believe, etc., just like men can. "


This makes absolutely zero sense. You learned from the wrong person.

TyperWoods said:

---

As far as biggest busts...Ken Hall sez remember me?

---

Bear said later in life that one of his biggest regrets was how he used Ken Hall.

achooooo said:

---

And according to the posters comments, Mixon would have been crucified because he was black regardless of her past conduct; after all she was white and he was black.

---

I am thinking had he just pushed her down or even forcefully shoved her away, there is likely no issue. But dude when straight Mike Tyson on a chick. That's kind of hard to defend.

Hilarious. Unless you are in law enforcement or are an attorney who handles this stuff like I do- you're clueless.

The fact that- from my 15 years of work in this area- probably 1 in 50 of these result in the woman prosecuted but 49 out of 50 leading to the man being prosecuted- still proves the point being made.

And also from my legal experience and life experience- family members who are not witnesses to events are 99% of the time very biased in favor of their family member and will accept no information to the contrary. That is not to say I wouldn't have potentially reacted the same way because that's instinctive for a dad to do. But because Ferguson reacted the way he did isn't evidence of anything specific.

Maybe Demas is the bad guy. Maybe he isn't. But it's amazing how many conclusions have already been made about this kid and his character.

HowdyTexasAggies said:

---

" I found out years later that being a "gentleman" was in fact disrespectful towards women because they too are human beings that can talk, think, feel, believe, etc., just like men can. "


This makes absolutely zero sense. You learned from the wrong person.

---

I learned from decades of real-life experience, as to how other human beings (that includes women too, for your information) can truly be...

cevans_40 said:

---

achooooo said:

---

And according to the posters comments, Mixon would have been crucified because he was black regardless of her past conduct; after all she was white and he was black.

---

I am thinking had he just pushed her down or even forcefully shoved her away, there is likely no issue. But dude when straight Mike Tyson on a chick. That's kind of hard to defend.

---

As the video shows that he punched her after she put her hands on him first by her pushing and striking him, which makes her no better than him.

Why do you think the book was not thrown at him despite the attempts?

JMJLAW said:

---

Hilarious. Unless you are in law enforcement or are an attorney who handles this stuff like I do- you're clueless.

The fact that- from my 15 years of work in this area- probably 1 in 50 of these result in the woman prosecuted but 49 out of 50 leading to the man being prosecuted- still proves the point being made.

And also from my legal experience and life experience- family members who are not witnesses to events are 99% of the time very biased in favor of their family member and will accept no information to the contrary. That is not to say I wouldn't have potentially reacted the same way because that's instinctive for a dad to do. But because Ferguson reacted the way he did isn't evidence of anything specific.

Maybe Demas is the bad guy. Maybe he isn't. But it's amazing how many conclusions have already been made about this kid and his character.

---

Keep in mind that many (potential) recruits also see these threads....

BJC said:

---

JMJLAW said:

---

Hilarious. Unless you are in law enforcement or are an attorney who handles this stuff like I do- you're clueless.

The fact that- from my 15 years of work in this area- probably 1 in 50 of these result in the woman prosecuted but 49 out of 50 leading to the man being prosecuted- still proves the point being made.

And also from my legal experience and life experience- family members who are not witnesses to events are 99% of the time very biased in favor of their family member and will accept no information to the contrary. That is not to say I wouldn't have potentially reacted the same way because that's instinctive for a dad to do. But because Ferguson reacted the way he did isn't evidence of anything specific.

Maybe Demas is the bad guy. Maybe he isn't. But it's amazing how many conclusions have already been made about this kid and his character.

---

Keep in mind that many (potential) recruits also see these threads....

---

Good.

Maybe they will understand that parents of Aggie girls will beat them down right there in front of God and everybody if they strike a woman.

Some of our players evidently never got that message at home.

BJC, if you feel that Mixon was justified in smashing in that young lady's face then I feel sorry for any female in your life expecting you to stand up for her.

NM.

achooooo said:

---

BJC, if you feel that Mixon was justified in smashing in that young lady's face then I feel sorry for any female in your life expecting you to stand up for her.

---

achooooo,

In case you and other "gentlemen" here missed it, my simple point is that both men and women should keep their hands to themselves. If you are going to condemn Mixon for putting his hands on a woman then on the same note you should also condemn Molitor for putting her hands on a man considering that the evidence (via video) showed that she was the physical aggressor thus giving credence to her being a misandric man beater.

Take note that I have never justified neither Joe Mixon's nor Amelia Molitor's actions, for they both were wrong to resort to putting hands on each other when cooler heads could have easily prevailed. They are both lucky that they did not receive any serious legal charges and both should take this as a lesson learned.

maroon barchetta said:

---

BJC said:

---

JMJLAW said:

---

Hilarious. Unless you are in law enforcement or are an attorney who handles this stuff like I do- you're clueless.

The fact that- from my 15 years of work in this area- probably 1 in 50 of these result in the woman prosecuted but 49 out of 50 leading to the man being prosecuted- still proves the point being made.

And also from my legal experience and life experience- family members who are not witnesses to events are 99% of the time very biased in favor of their family member and will accept no information to the contrary. That is not to say I wouldn't have potentially reacted the same way because that's instinctive for a dad to do. But because Ferguson reacted the way he did isn't evidence of anything specific.

Maybe Demas is the bad guy. Maybe he isn't. But it's amazing how many conclusions have already been made about this kid and his character.

---

Keep in mind that many (potential) recruits also see these threads....

---

Good.

Maybe they will understand that parents of Aggie girls will beat them down right there in front of God and everybody if they strike a woman.

Some of our players evidently never got that message at home.

---

While I both understand and agree with parents defending their daughters from harm; however, you and others here should also keep in mind that the same could apply when the parents of Aggie boys may also defend their sons from the harm inflicted by an errant female striking on their son....

That being said, the message that EVERYONE (both sons and daughters) should receive at home:

KEEP YOUR HANDS TO YOURSELF

You have over-trolled.

maroon barchetta said:

---

You have over-trolled.

---

Says the poster who has no AgTag; if you are going to address abuse on one end, then it would be prudent to address it on the other end as well.

JMJLAW said:

---

Hilarious. Unless you are in law enforcement or are an attorney who handles this stuff like I do- you're clueless.

The fact that- from my 15 years of work in this area- probably 1 in 50 of these result in the woman prosecuted but 49 out of 50 leading to the man being prosecuted- still proves the point being made.

And also from my legal experience and life experience- family members who are not witnesses to events are 99% of the time very biased in favor of their family member and will accept no information to the contrary. That is not to say I wouldn't have potentially reacted the same way because that's instinctive for a dad to do. But because Ferguson reacted the way he did isn't evidence of anything specific.

Maybe Demas is the bad guy. Maybe he isn't. But it's amazing how many conclusions have already been made about this kid and his character.

---

Exactly!!

Especially your last paragraph…

BJC said:

---

maroon barchetta said:

---

You have over-trolled.

---

Says the poster who has no AgTag; if you are going to address abuse on one end, then it would be prudent to address it on the other end as well.

---

Say the poster with a free account.

BJC said:

---

cevans_40 said:

---

achooooo said:

---

And according to the posters comments, Mixon would have been crucified because he was black regardless of her past conduct; after all she was white and he was black.

---

I am thinking had he just pushed her down or even forcefully shoved her away, there is likely no issue. But dude when straight Mike Tyson on a chick. That's kind of hard to defend.

---

As the video shows that he punched her after she put her hands on him first by her pushing and striking him, which makes her no better than him.

Why do you think the book was not thrown at him despite the attempts?

---

Because it happened in Norman and the DA decided to go with the misdemeanor charge rather than the felony one?

https://www.oklahoman.com/story/sports/college/sooners/2014/08/15/ou-freshman-rb-joe-mixon-charged-with-one-misdemeanor-count/60805913007/

Quote:

---

. . . The probable cause affidavit turned in from the Norman Police recommended either aggravated assault charges a felony and/or the lesser misdemeanor count.
. . .
Molitor fell into a table and then to the ground, where she was unconscious, as Mixon fled the scene.

Molitor was taken to Norman Regional Hospital, where she was found to have a fractured jaw, fractured cheek bone, fractured sinus and fractured orbital bone, which caused damage to her left eye.

---

It's like asking why Sandusky was able to skate the first time a mom went to the police over his naked "horseplay" with her kid back in '98. It's be because the D.A. carefully considers all the ramifications and tries to cover for local celebrities to the extent possible. The D.A. holds an elected position, and prosecuting the local rooting interest isn't a great career move in a small county.

FWIW Molitor wasn't charged. If nothing else because it would have been humiliating for Mixon and the program, and would have looked bad given all the broken bones he delivered in response to being provoked. .

However in these situations if there's to be any recompense you can't derail the career. There's a happy ending in that they both got paid.

https://www.si.com/nfl/2017/04/21/joe-mixon-amelia-molitor-settlement

rootube said:

---

Riddle me this, law hawks.

---

Did someone mention Aggie Law Hawk??

[url=https://www.bing.com/search?q=texas+law+hawk+commercial&form=ANSPH1&refig=25a8a2584cc9409c81d1f2fa2e1d29c1&pc=U531&sp=4&qs=UT&pq=texas+law+ha&sk=PRES1HS1AS1MT1&sc=8-12&cvid=25a8a2584cc9409c81d1f2fa2e1d29c1#][/url]

AgOutsideAustin said:

---

Ferguson was SEC ready he would snap Demas like a twig.

---

Man among boys. Didn't go to a single class. NFL after one season. Definition of SEC ready.