Kenneth_2003 said:91AggieLawyer said:Seven Costanza said:
At what point in time did college football go from "a bunch of guys from our school are going to meet up and play a bunch of guys from your school, and people are going to come watch it" to something with paid coaching staffs with players that were specifically invited to attend the school to play football?
That question depends on the school, but probably in the 1920s. By the mid-30s, it was a lot like it is now, in terms of what you're speaking of. Once money got involved, state schools and private schools like Notre Dame and USC started funding the programs to compete. The Academies and the Ivys kept up somewhat as long as they could but by the '60s, started to wane. The '70s brought scholarship limitations, the split of the Divisions, and a system pretty much like it is now.
What is left unexplained is why A&M had very little success between our championship year and these reforms. The war(s) didn't help. But I'm at a loss to further explain it. t.u. overrecruiting doesn't explain everything.
No ladies and compulsory Corps membership meant you were coming to A&M for reasons other than athletic prowess I believe.
OK, I forgot about the Corps, but frankly during that time, I don't think people saw it the same way we see it today. In other words, I don't think it was until the '60s that young men saw being in the Corps as something they'd really rather not do. Many joined National Guard units while in college.
Those that had no interest in any of that weren't going to play football anyway. But I guess you're right about women.