Blue Star for the All Stars!DrZ said:
I heard Jimbo say he wanted to take the 5 star kids and turn them into 7 stars. SEVEN STARS. can you imagine. That my friend is a goal.
Blue Star for the All Stars!DrZ said:
I heard Jimbo say he wanted to take the 5 star kids and turn them into 7 stars. SEVEN STARS. can you imagine. That my friend is a goal.
BrotherChad said:
Recruiting has been outstanding. Even Chad can't be mad about that.
However, it is my belief that getting 3-4*'s to play like 5*'s is far more valuable than being able to recruit 5*'s that ultimately stay the same (looking at you Sumlin #shotsfired).
Realistically where should we be next season with our player development goals?
I agree with your observations. They are correct. However, miller58's bullcrap was insisting that we needed to get recruiters who routinely get 4 and 5-star dudes, as if there was nothing else to it, not even realizing that a fairly pedestrian recruiter at a hot, "up" program will still recruit highly . . . so much more goes into it, plus he/she was pretty negative and kinda cray-cray about it.TexanJeff said:
Honestly ... the idea that we could take enough 3 stars (Mike Evans' and JJ Watts) and make them 4-5 star players on the field has been proving to be a myth beyond the shadow of a doubt.
If you look at the last few national Champions, LSU, Alabama, Clemson, Auburn, and even back to 2005 with tu... all of these teams were loaded with 4 and 5 star difference makers from multiple top ten classes.
Yes, on an individual basis as to which 5 star will be a Speedy Noil vs a Christian Kirk ... but if you have 5 shots at getting a Christian Kirk it is better than 1.
The math is just the math.
AND YES I KNOW I SOUND LIKE MILLER 58 AND IT KILLS ME.