PeekingDuck said:
Nothing about it was extremely lackluster. He moved the ball very well and two of his ints were extremely bad luck. His command of the offense was night and day game 1 vs Calzada after a year of playing. He may not be Matt Corral, but he's functional.
We had 600 yards of offense with King having 300 of it. Where is this narrative coming from that he had a terrible game? Go look up Calzada's actual stats. Like just look at the *********numbers. Good grief.
Sorry had to reply to this, too. EXACTLY. Calzada D suckers? Simply look at his freaking stats! Why in the world would you want to have him starting any future game when he has proven that he is a bottom of the SEC QB? We aren't going to win in any significant manner with any QB putting us these kind of stats. I don't care who his name is or how tough you may think he is. Just stupid to wish this upon any team you desire to get into the CFP and compete for the West and natties. Amazing to me.
Let me help the mentally challenged...
Passing Efficiency? Zach is 91st.
Pass Completion %? He is 97th.
Passing Yard? He is 76th. Yea!!!
So we are talking about a QB not even considered to be a top 75 QB in college. While Jimbo is bring in a Top 3 recruiting team. This is who you think should start? We owe Zach NOTHING. Only wins matter at the end of the day and all of us should realize this loud and clear.