If you were forced to wager all the money that you have to your name, would you put it on Cincinnati or the Aggies to win if they were to hypothetically play head-to-head neutral site....

Remove as much bias as you possibly can and take off the maroon tinted glasses, who would you put your money on?

Oh by the way, Aggies for me. I wouldn't be super confident but I would be less confident if I put money on Cincinnati


Disclaimer, I think it's great that they are at least going to have the chance 2 prove a lot of people wrong, but come on, they have to play Alabama

With our current lineup, Cincinnati.

I'm not saying I 100pct disagree with you and think you're wrong, just interested in what people's thoughts are. I hadn't watched Cincinnati much this year

McAg99 said:

---

Remove as much bias as you possibly can and take off the maroon tinted glasses,

---

That's not possible on this website

Cincinnati

Main reason is game location. If at Kyle I'd say A&M but away from home we have struggled.

Cincinnati is a solid top 15 team. I think we're a solid top 15 too.

We'd be undefeated with their schedule and they might be 7-5 to 9-3 with ours.

I can't remove the bias so I'd say the Ags by a smidge.

There's plenty of teams I would definitely take over them though. Ohio State probably +14, Utah and Pitt by a touchdown.

Yeah, after further review, that's asking the impossible. LOL

Bama has got to be a rather large favorite, I'm not a professional gambler but I'd have to think it would be over 15 for sure

Let me put it this way. I'd take anyone in the top 10 sans Notre Dame and okie st against cincy

Aggies

That UCF team a few years ago would have smoked them... Cincinnati probably owes their opportunity to play in the playoffs a little bit to those that went before them and were left out due conference affiliation

Cincy. Hate to say it but not much confidence in our team at this moment.

The Big 12 was the weakest conference and has been since we left. They (Cincinnati) are joining this clown show of irrelevant commuters and small footprint private schools. If they played the new Big 12 schedule minus the Sips and Oklahoma they would've all beat up on each other and they would be ranked appropriately around 13 or something.

The further dilution of the Big 12 is going to tank the entire conference.

That is a very not serious question

Thank you for your opinion.

If I knew Achane would get 20 plus touches I'd pick Ags. Having him get subbed in the 4th quarter again and ……….

He didn't get snubbed by those who pick the all-sec teams this year. Congratulations to Bullet Train Achane btw

McAg99 said:

---

If you were forced to wager all the money that you have to your name, would you put it on Cincinnati or the Aggies to win if they were to hypothetically play head-to-head neutral site....

Remove as much bias as you possibly can and take off the maroon tinted glasses, who would you put your money on?

---

With a full team (no opt-outs/injuries) I would feel very good about putting it on the Ags.

PascalsWager said:

---

The Big 12 was the weakest conference and has been since we left. They (Cincinnati) are joining this clown show of irrelevant commuters and small footprint private schools. If they played the new Big 12 schedule minus the Sips and Oklahoma they would've all beat up on each other and they would be ranked appropriately around 13 or something.

The further dilution of the Big 12 is going to tank the entire conference.

---

This always entertains me. The old "The Big 12 fell apart when we left", like we were just owning it while there. How about we focus on winning anywhere, there or here?

Correct…..we've pretty much been irrelevant since 2013.

BLSD said:

---

Correct…..we've pretty much been irrelevant since 2013.

---

I mean. It's not like we finished 4th last year and missed the CFP at 5. But sure. Irrelevant since 2013.

McAg99 said:

---

If you were forced to wager all the money that you have to your name, would you put it on Cincinnati or the Aggies to win if they were to hypothetically play head-to-head neutral site....

Remove as much bias as you possibly can and take off the maroon tinted glasses, who would you put your money on?

---

Aggies would win, no question. That assumes no op-outs. Aggies would dominate. It would probably be close in the first half, but late in the game when they're subbing in their 3 stars and walk ons and we still have guys like Clemons, Leal, Spiller, and Achane fresh, the game would be over.

McAg99 said:

---

That UCF team a few years ago would have smoked them... Cincinnati probably owes their opportunity to play in the playoffs a little bit to those that went before them and were left out due conference affiliation

---

No, they owe their opportunity to having beaten a Notre Dame team who started the season with only one decent team on its schedule - Cincinnati - and they lost that game. Yup, it really is as simple as that.