Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Sparty takes the lead

2,917 Views | 39 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by maver1ck
PascalsWager
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggies2009 said:

PascalsWager said:

All this rah rah bs ain't going to work in Columbus for Sparty.

We're headed towards the same boring annual playoff of Ohio State, Oklahoma, SEC Champ, and fan-less interest-devoid commuter AAC school.

Why do we watch this garbage?
I mean.... Georgia and Cincinnati aren't regulars in the CFP.

Also, I think OU will lose a few of their next games. It might be Ok State in there which, again, is a newcomer.
Cincinnati is the kind of commuter school that shouldn't have a football team. There's more fans of them in the national media than in the state of Ohio. Because every kid going there is going to their safety school.

Georgia has been there before; but you're right they're not regulars.

The point is that we're being sold that this is some quirky, interesting season. And its the same garbage we've seen for the past 7 years. None of this matters. We're not even getting to a see a rotation of big time programs in the playoff. Expansion is badly needed.
Aggieair
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PascalsWager said:

All this rah rah bs ain't going to work in Columbus for Sparty.

We're headed towards the same boring annual playoff of Ohio State, Oklahoma, SEC Champ, and fan-less interest-devoid commuter AAC school.

Why do we watch this garbage?


Uh, who do you think was going to be in the playoffs? What would have been better besides expanding the playoffs?
PascalsWager
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggieair said:

PascalsWager said:

All this rah rah bs ain't going to work in Columbus for Sparty.

We're headed towards the same boring annual playoff of Ohio State, Oklahoma, SEC Champ, and fan-less interest-devoid commuter AAC school.

Why do we watch this garbage?


Uh, who do you think was going to be in the playoffs? What would have been better besides expanding the playoffs?
Texas A&M

But really any flagship state university for the first time.
Aggieair
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PascalsWager said:

Aggieair said:

PascalsWager said:

All this rah rah bs ain't going to work in Columbus for Sparty.

We're headed towards the same boring annual playoff of Ohio State, Oklahoma, SEC Champ, and fan-less interest-devoid commuter AAC school.

Why do we watch this garbage?


Uh, who do you think was going to be in the playoffs? What would have been better besides expanding the playoffs?
Texas A&M

But really any flagship state university for the first time.


Well I don't know why you're blaming Michigan and Michigan State for A&M losing 2 games and not being in the top 4.

But besides that, as already mentioned above, Georgia has only been in the playoffs once before, and a G5 team has never made it. Yet you say that's boring. And the usual suspect of Clemson is eliminated and Alabama and Notre Dame probably won't make it either.

Some people just always need something to complain about. Also weird that you have a fixation on "flagship" schools.
Divining Rod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B10 football is almost unwatchable. play after play- QBs so unathletic compared to SEC. 4 teams anywhere NEAR the top 10 is a joke.

This AP voting is becoming another cultural war.
maver1ck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Divining Rod said:

B10 football is almost unwatchable. play after play- QBs so unathletic compared to SEC. 4 teams anywhere NEAR the top 10 is a joke.

This AP voting is becoming another cultural war.

This is usually true

But I mean cmon. That UM MSU game was pretty awesome
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.