Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Adding the sips and sooners does not mean more money because it'll be destablizing.

924 Views | 4 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by Win At Life
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sure in the short team they'll payout a little more since we'll be the first super conference. I'm highly skeptical they'll pull in >$250M like what's being thrown around but they'll bring in some.

But in the long term they'll poison this conference like they have the others, they'll tilt the table their way until teams with a landing spot will get sick of it and jump and the sycophants will be all that's left. The future revenue from this conference will have an expiration date and we'll find out that we would have been better off revenue-wise not admitting them at all. Now consider future revenue without a destabilizing force that'll eventually end it, we wanted this conference because it was the most prestigious and the most stable. Now Sankey and the ignorant fools at the schools want add poison to the conference because it looks good for the damn resume and it will get more money in the short term.

Let them go to the ACC, that's basically the Big 12 2.0 since it's Clemson and the rest. It's so much better watching them poison a conference from afar.
concac
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In the Big 12, they were men among boys so they were able to rule the roost. They always kept it in their pockets the threat to leave the Big 12 and have the other teams fend for themselves. That kept the other teams in line.

In the SEC, that won't be the case. They can't get away with doing that crap with Bama, A&M, Florida, LSU, et. al., watching. At least I hope this will be the case.
Sterling82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When the B12 started tu was anything but men amongst boys with respect to football. Really not with respect to anything. And it didn't stop their self serving agenda from eroding the prestige of the conference.
Off_The_Wood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sterling82 said:

When the B12 started tu was anything but men amongst boys with respect to football. Really not with respect to anything. And it didn't stop their self serving agenda from eroding the prestige of the conference.


You are delusional. The Texas system endowment is second only to Harvard. They are 25x the second largest endowment in the B12. Texas is the biggest fish in any pond. That's how they are able to exert so much control and get what they want.
Deplorable
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No amount of money is worth being in same conference with them again. **** Texas.
Win At Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RealTalk said:

In the Big 12, they were men among boys so they were able to rule the roost. They always kept it in their pockets the threat to leave the Big 12 and have the other teams fend for themselves. That kept the other teams in line.

In the SEC, that won't be the case. They can't get away with doing that crap with Bama, A&M, Florida, LSU, et. al., watching. At least I hope this will be the case.
I've been saying this for 2 days. But now it seems tu is "big" enough to get the whole "egalitarian" SEC to crap in our bed behind our backs for 6 months. If true, then by definition, the SEC is not "big" enough to keep tu from ruling the roost.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.