buppy said:
We are the MAROON headed step child of college football
FIFY
buppy said:
We are the MAROON headed step child of college football
This except I don't think Sippy is so nationally beloved that they should be in the conversation with Bama, tOSU and programs of that ilk. Hell, Sippy hasn't even been relevant in 15 years and weren't relevant before that for what...30-40 years. That said, more nationally beloved than us...yes.Superb Sasquatch said:
I honestly don't think it has anythign to do with the media "hating" A&M more than A&M hasn't been a traditional power like Bama, tOSU, etc. The Aggies also don't have a huge TV market like ND or Texas. so they don't see a need to really "lift them up" like the do other programs.
How do we fix that? Win. The media CANNOT ignore a program that wins, no matter how much they try. Look at UCF, Boise state in the 2010s, etc. Just win baby and the rest takes care of itself.
F'em#Mke said:
You can tell that there is so much disdain for A&M among the national sports media. You can tell that they absolutely hate that A&M beat Florida and is ranked ahead of them. They hate that a Notre Dame win could get A&M into the playoffs, and they hate that A&M is threatening their beloved Ohio State. But my questions is why? We're 7-1 and our only loss is to #1 Alabama. We've got a pretty good case to be in the conversation if you ask me, as evident by our Top 5 ranking.
I know from older Ags that there is a history of national sports media putting down A&M, and just wanted to know some of the history behind that if anybody cares to share!
OKC~Ag said:F'em#Mke said:
You can tell that there is so much disdain for A&M among the national sports media. You can tell that they absolutely hate that A&M beat Florida and is ranked ahead of them. They hate that a Notre Dame win could get A&M into the playoffs, and they hate that A&M is threatening their beloved Ohio State. But my questions is why? We're 7-1 and our only loss is to #1 Alabama. We've got a pretty good case to be in the conversation if you ask me, as evident by our Top 5 ranking.
I know from older Ags that there is a history of national sports media putting down A&M, and just wanted to know some of the history behind that if anybody cares to share!
K_1987 said:
They are being honest. We are a good team, but the 4 team above us are better overall teams than A&M.
lil_frog8 said:
They hate us because they have BAS as well... every time they find a reason to back us like the "Johnny Football story" we go and screw it up with a signatures for cash scandal, undefeated starts to epic melts in November, huge leads and pimp sticks to epic fourth qtr craters. We have always pulled the rug out from under the media in recent history so it's a lot easier to cast as the heel than the hero.
It clearly was a childish remark.#Mke said:Puzzling response but okcheroczech said:
The national media doesn't hate A&M. They just hate you.
K_1987 said:
Bama, Clemson, ND are all conservative institutions. This has nothing to do with poltics. We are just not as good as the team above us.
K_1987 said:
They are being honest. We are a good team, but the 4 team above us are better overall teams than A&M.
cheroczech said:
The national media doesn't hate A&M. They just hate you.
Quote:

You people are nuts. Lol. Alex Jones loonies personified.Ian Neff said:
The national media is riddled with leftists.
That is why.
No worries. He'll forgive you.Quote:
I swear to Christ
FamilyForeverAgs said:K_1987 said:
Bama, Clemson, ND are all conservative institutions. This has nothing to do with poltics. We are just not as good as the team above us.
I respectfully disagree, and believe A&M is more conservative than any of the schools you listed.
I also believe we can currently beat any team in the country.
Get Off My Lawn said:
They hate the bevel. And they're justified.
Honestly, though, there are "cooler" teams. As much as we mock the uterus, it's a much better logo that invokes far more to the overage unaffiliated than ATM.
As much as ND gets the attention: the Fighting Irish invokes more than Fightin' Texas Aggies and lends itself to better imagery.
As dumb as dotting the i in Ohio may be, the helmet sticker thing and their winning tradition stand out.
I think A&M has far better traditions and clearly has more of them, but they're not are relatable (from the outside looking in you can't understand it), marketable, or unavoidable. The media doesn't have a reason to fawn over us at this point.
Ian Neff said:
The national media is riddled with leftists.
That is why.
Notre Dame, Auburn...alans17 said:Ian Neff said:
The national media is riddled with leftists.
That is why.
That must be why they love Alabama, LSU, Georgia, Florida...
That is so wrong when compared to Texas. A&M has every bit of the market share that Texas does, or damn close especially in state. Concerning ND, I will agree; they truly have a national brand and viewership audience based primarily on the geographical variance in where their alumni live. But both A&M and Texas have a significant majority of their alumni, brand, and viewership within the state. All the major cities of Houston, Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio (where the TV market money matters) have basically equal share between A&M & Texas. This isn't the late 90s or early 2000s anymore.Superb Sasquatch said:
I honestly don't think it has anythign to do with the media "hating" A&M more than A&M hasn't been a traditional power like Bama, tOSU, etc. The Aggies also don't have a huge TV market like ND or Texas. so they don't see a need to really "lift them up" like the do other programs.
How do we fix that? Win. The media CANNOT ignore a program that wins, no matter how much they try. Look at UCF, Boise state in the 2010s, etc. Just win baby and the rest takes care of itself.