How do you think Reggie's career would have been different in this offense? With a serious, intentional running game, under center, etc...? Would he have won? Would he have gotten a real shot in the NFL?
hey hey, im pushing 40... he's a little further awaySouth Platte said:
He's pushing 40. I'd be hesitant . . .
I laughedTexanJeff said:
Unfortunately if his Offensive Line is a bunch of Matadors he would spend much of his time running for his life so may not be able to put it together.
You know this is a compliment, right?4 said:
I knew Reggie McNeal, and you, sir, are no Reggie McNeal.
South Platte said:
He's pushing 40. I'd be hesitant . . .
What a hopeful time Slocum's last year, and Frans first year was...Earl_Rudder said:
I will die on this hill, Fran ruined Reggie. He would have won the Heisman with Jimbo as a head coach.
Everyone remembers his athleticism and his speed, but he also had an arm. What could have been without Fran...
i dunno, i think he was more similar to jff in terms of elusiveness than people are giving him credit for - i don't remember him taking too many head on hits.H.E. Pennypacker said:
Jameis is a more natural/better pocket passer, and JFF was a better natural athlete/improviser. I don't think Reggie would have been better than either. BUT, he's a better version of Mond running, throwing etc. Not as physically tough though.