Bo Darville said:

---

HossAg said:

---

I just gave you two teams that have talent better than theirs. OU has more talent than A&M.

---

Ya, and they choked a 25 point lead away when OU finally got it in gear.

---

Do you really not think it'd be a competitive game against Baylor?

Which is the embarrassing part of this whole conversation.

Why do we keep talking about Baylor. Let's talk about teams in our conference we are better than. Like Vanderbilt and Kentucky.

HossAg said:

---

Some people just ignore logic and eye tests and don't watch the teams they're talking **** about play. I've watched Baylor play a bunch this year and they'd beat us.

---

He's basically saying A&M would be 12-0 or 11-1 with a shot at the playoff if A&M were in the Big 12?

Your answer is simple, stack the top 6 of the SEC against the top 6 of the BDF......and it's not close......and it helps the rest make more sense

Bo Darville said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Baylor had a few players that have developed very well, and have a great combo of excellent receivers and an excellent qb.

Even a blind Squirrel finds a nut every now and then.

I doubt it lasts. I like our long term chances much more.

---

Baylor's current class ranks 10th in the Big 12. Rhule's recruiting leaves a lot to be desired/

---

That's the thing about college football. Sometimes an 18 yo kid develops more than expected by the time they are a senior. There is a bit of luck there.

HossAg said:

---

Some people just ignore logic and eye tests and don't watch the teams they're talking **** about play. I've watched Baylor play a bunch this year and they'd beat us.

---

I agree.

Bo Darville said:

---

Thier schedule.


Their best win is Iowa State. They'd be 7-4 and getting the **** kicked out of them by LSU if they had our schedule.

---

B/S We'll have to prove it
We haven't earned any assumptions

I have no doubt we would have a better record than Baylol if were still in the whorn conference.

AvidAggie said:

---

Bo Darville said:

---

HossAg said:

---

I just gave you two teams that have talent better than theirs. OU has more talent than A&M.

---

Ya, and they choked a 25 point lead away when OU finally got it in gear.

---

Do you really not think it'd be a competitive game against Baylor?

Which is the embarrassing part of this whole conversation.

---

I think it would be competitive but we would win.

Elephant Ghost said:

---

Bo Darville said:

---

Thier schedule.


Their best win is Iowa State. They'd be 7-4 and getting the **** kicked out of them by LSU if they had our schedule.

---

B/S We'll have to prove it
We haven't earned any assumptions

---

Neither have they

barnag said:

---

Cue Bo Darville to explain how they're not

---

It is hilarious that Texags now hangs on every word of a dude that used to troll the F outta this site and has no telling how many bans.

(Yes I realize the quoted post was in jest but some of the morons here do hang on his every word)

Bo Darville said:

---

Thier schedule.


Their best win is Iowa State. They'd be 7-4 and getting the **** kicked out of them by LSU if they had our schedule.

---

Wrong. No way in hell that team gets beat 50-7.

OldShadeOfBlue said:

---

Bo Darville said:

---

Thier schedule.


Their best win is Iowa State. They'd be 7-4 and getting the **** kicked out of them by LSU if they had our schedule.

---

Wrong. No way in hell that team gets beat 50-7.

---

If they choked away a 25 point lead to a meh OU squad then it's definitely possible against a motivated LSU.

How should they have beaten OU? They got dismantled in the second half.

Better coach

Atleast Rhule will be plucked for an NFL job in the next season or two (think giants). Baylor has the problem of being a step stone college . No one wants to make it a destination job. At the end of the day you're coaching and living in Waco. Magnolia house BS be damned.

ashley said:

---

Why do we keep talking about Baylor. Let's talk about teams in our conference we are better than. Like Vanderbilt and Kentucky.

---

A guy posing as an Aggie (and sucking at it) is going to tell posters what they can and can't post???????

Burnsey said:

---

I have no doubt we would have a better record than Baylol if were still in the whorn conference.

---

If only we had some metric to measure how A&M would fare if they were in the Big 12. Oh well.

Baylor uses transfers better than A&M is my guess

Hahahah a "meh OU" team.

You probably still believe that Mexico is going to pay for the wall too

Sumlins Pool Guy said:

---

Hahahah a "meh OU" team.

You probably still believe that Mexico is going to pay for the wall too

---

OU is meh.

the shame with Baylor...

they still have a shot at the playoff with the following non-conference schedule:

Rice (3-9)
UTSA (4-8)
SFA-FCS

just play the cupcakes

Why bother bringing up Baylor? They play a soft schedule. It's easy to have wins like that with a soft schedule.
Also, they have a poor defense. I think Baylor and A&M would be in a shoot out if they played, A&M's defense would be the difference would win out.

W said:

---

the shame with Baylor...

they still have a shot at the playoff with the following non-conference schedule:

Rice (3-9)
UTSA (4-8)
SFA-FCS

just play the cupcakes

---

Uh, let's look at A&M's non-P5 schedule:

Texas State (3-9)
UTSA (4-8)
Lamar-FCS

I'm not seeing a lot of difference there.

We play Baylor....I like our odds....
Would feel a lot like the SCar game....maybe Miss St game too....

Bo Darville said:

---

aggie-master said:

---

Bo Darville said:

---

Thier schedule.


Their best win is Iowa State. They'd be 7-4 and getting the **** kicked out of them by LSU if they had our schedule.

---

They looked a lot better against Texas than LSU did.

---

So you think Baylor would beat LSU?

---

No, but I don't think they would get skunked like we did. They would look like they fielded a defense and their QB wouldn't look like a freshman starting his first game.

Dark_Knight said:

---

Why bother bringing up Baylor? They play a soft schedule. It's easy to have wins like that with a soft schedule.
Also, they have a poor defense. I think Baylor and A&M would be in a shoot out if they played, A&M's defense would be the difference would win out.

---

Baylor's defense is actually the reason they are winning. Their offense isn't that good. They only allow like 20 ppg.

Bo Darville said:

---

barnag said:

---

Cue Bo Darville to explain how they're not

---

What do you think their record would be with our schedule?

Who do they beat that we didn't?

---

Your schedule was by choice, can't blame moving to SEC on anyone but the powers that be, but those are awesome venue's and games for fans. Yes, Baylor had a soft schedule, but still played OU with a chance to win and took care of the rest pasties including UT. Rhule has done a better coaching job than Herman or Fisher with less talent. Maybe scheme, I really don't know. Whatever he is doing, its working. Texas or A&M should be better. No excuses. We both thought we hired the right person for the job. Fisher at least has done it before. Herman.... better get it done next year or it might be over.

A better QB at A&M will make all the difference. Just gotta find that guy.

Before tonight I thought a head to head Baylor-A &M game would be a wear them down 2 Td Aggie win. Not anymore.

Bailure is the best team in Texas. No disputing that, especially after tonight's lobotomy.

BoxingAg84 said:

---

Bailure is the best team in Texas. No disputing that, especially after tonight's lobotomy.

---

I think we'd do well but don't think our secondary would keep up

The REAL question here...

Are the Ags overachieving or underachieving?

Is Baylor overachieving or underachieving?

I'd love to play them in a bowl game right now just to end the stupidity of this discussion. They've got a terrible OL and a defense that lets a lot of drives go long, and we've got a terrible OL and an offense that struggles to keep drives going. They gave up.a 25 point lead to the one really good team they've faced.

It's be a fun ****show of a game for all