Old "Home of the 12th Man" Sign
10,257 Views |
39 Replies |
Last: 5 yr ago by greg.w.h
My money is on an old picture.
I thought about that, and I'm really hoping that's not the case. Endzones were maroon for last year's Spring Game.....
Weird, there's an old picture on my money.AGS10TAK said:
My money is on an old picture.
Which one of you has a drone?
StickTogetherAgs
Joined:
Dec 31, 2015
Posts:
2,358
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Was that your house?MondayMorningQB said:
Which one of you has a drone?
Would love to see maroon end zones permanently
Looks so much better
Looks so much better
Outdoor board guys could tell you exactly when the pic was taken based on clouds and shadows.
To the most casual of Aggie observers it should be clear that that is an OLD image not a 2019 one...unless we are digging up the old third deck scoreboards too (seriously doubt that)
Make Mental Asylums Great Again!
I'm missing something. Why would we want the old signs up?
rbcs_2 said:
I'm missing something. Why would we want the old signs up?
Cause the new one looked like crap.
A) Critical thinking skills people. It's obviously an old picture.
B) It's embarrassing how many of you see stuff like this and draw conclusions like the OP. Same with obvious satirical material (Jimbo going by James, the 7 foot, 500 pound TE, etc.). Bunch of rubes!
C) The new signage looks infinitely better than the old one, they just need to complete the gun metal gray paneling to cover up the exposed concrete and find a way to make the lettering stand out a bit more during the day.
D) BTHOEveryone in 2019!
E) TGIF
B) It's embarrassing how many of you see stuff like this and draw conclusions like the OP. Same with obvious satirical material (Jimbo going by James, the 7 foot, 500 pound TE, etc.). Bunch of rubes!
C) The new signage looks infinitely better than the old one, they just need to complete the gun metal gray paneling to cover up the exposed concrete and find a way to make the lettering stand out a bit more during the day.
D) BTHOEveryone in 2019!
E) TGIF
The new signage shouldn't need improvement if infinitely better. Or your argumentation might simply be infinitely poor.
The two issues are contrast (large white letters on maroon v letters that mix maroon and white on gray) and color matching of the background. Neither was well considered and the excuse is to have it lit so it's more visible when it's darker.
I think the new design is a compromise in order to match a vision that never was going to work well and the school has a NASTY habit of taking criticism poorly and many Aggies defend the school when appropriately criticised.
It's okay to say "it's not that bad." It's not okay to claim "it's infinitely better." The latter seeks to dehumanize the opposing argument largely just to win the argument. If you cannot agree it's a compromise design you possibly aren't qualified to comment. That the school defends it is because they prefer the intent of the design which is to unify with bare concrete.
The real issue is the lack of the second deck scrap and rebuild causes all of the exposed concrete to look patchy so they were trying to unify the look by covering that section with a color that matched the new concrete. They're hiding a bad decision.
The two issues are contrast (large white letters on maroon v letters that mix maroon and white on gray) and color matching of the background. Neither was well considered and the excuse is to have it lit so it's more visible when it's darker.
I think the new design is a compromise in order to match a vision that never was going to work well and the school has a NASTY habit of taking criticism poorly and many Aggies defend the school when appropriately criticised.
It's okay to say "it's not that bad." It's not okay to claim "it's infinitely better." The latter seeks to dehumanize the opposing argument largely just to win the argument. If you cannot agree it's a compromise design you possibly aren't qualified to comment. That the school defends it is because they prefer the intent of the design which is to unify with bare concrete.
The real issue is the lack of the second deck scrap and rebuild causes all of the exposed concrete to look patchy so they were trying to unify the look by covering that section with a color that matched the new concrete. They're hiding a bad decision.
greg.w.h said:
The new signage shouldn't need improvement if infinitely better. Or your argumentation might simply be infinitely poor.
The two issues are contrast (large white letters on maroon v letters that mix maroon and white on gray) and color matching of the background. Neither was well considered and the excuse is to have it lit so it's more visible when it's darker.
I think the new design is a compromise in order to match a vision that never was going to work well and the school has a NASTY habit of taking criticism poorly and many Aggies defend the school when appropriately criticised.
It's okay to say "it's not that bad." It's not okay to claim "it's infinitely better." The latter seeks to dehumanize the opposing argument largely just to win the argument. If you cannot agree it's a compromise design you possibly aren't qualified to comment. That the school defends it is because they prefer the intent of the design which is to unify with bare concrete.
The real issue is the lack of the second deck scrap and rebuild causes all of the exposed concrete to look patchy so they were trying to unify the look by covering that section with a color that matched the new concrete. They're hiding a bad decision.
Greg, your post is very good.
greg.w.h said:
The new signage shouldn't need improvement if infinitely better. Or your argumentation might simply be infinitely poor.
The two issues are contrast (large white letters on maroon v letters that mix maroon and white on gray) and color matching of the background. Neither was well considered and the excuse is to have it lit so it's more visible when it's darker.
I think the new design is a compromise in order to match a vision that never was going to work well and the school has a NASTY habit of taking criticism poorly and many Aggies defend the school when appropriately criticised.
It's okay to say "it's not that bad." It's not okay to claim "it's infinitely better." The latter seeks to dehumanize the opposing argument largely just to win the argument. If you cannot agree it's a compromise design you possibly aren't qualified to comment. That the school defends it is because they prefer the intent of the design which is to unify with bare concrete.
The real issue is the lack of the second deck scrap and rebuild causes all of the exposed concrete to look patchy so they were trying to unify the look by covering that section with a color that matched the new concrete. They're hiding a bad decision.
I can't imagine taking myself as seriously as you take yourself.greg.w.h said:
The new signage shouldn't need improvement if infinitely better. Or your argumentation might simply be infinitely poor.
The two issues are contrast (large white letters on maroon v letters that mix maroon and white on gray) and color matching of the background. Neither was well considered and the excuse is to have it lit so it's more visible when it's darker.
I think the new design is a compromise in order to match a vision that never was going to work well and the school has a NASTY habit of taking criticism poorly and many Aggies defend the school when appropriately criticised.
It's okay to say "it's not that bad." It's not okay to claim "it's infinitely better." The latter seeks to dehumanize the opposing argument largely just to win the argument. If you cannot agree it's a compromise design you possibly aren't qualified to comment. That the school defends it is because they prefer the intent of the design which is to unify with bare concrete.
The real issue is the lack of the second deck scrap and rebuild causes all of the exposed concrete to look patchy so they were trying to unify the look by covering that section with a color that matched the new concrete. They're hiding a bad decision.
It's an opinion. Nothing more, nothing less...and certainly not some ridiculous attempt to "dehumanize an opposing argument" (FYI, you can't dehumanize an argument as an argument isn't human, but I digress).
Does the sign need to be modified a bit to provide more constrast during the day? Yes, I said as much in my first post. However, the idea that what was up there before (font that didn't match the rest of the branding, the HORRIBLE fading maroon/pink background with the dainty little stars all over it) was better looking than what's there now is one that I wholeheartedly disagree with. Hell, many of us were griping about that background long before new Kyle was even announced, much less built.
I don't think greg understands what dehumanization means.
Morbo the Annihilator
Joined:
Nov 28, 2006
Posts:
9,669
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El. Oh. El.Quote:
The latter seeks to dehumanize the opposing argument largely just to win the argument.
came here to post this.
Aggiefootball posted today too with photos. thats an old photo in the OP
Aggiefootball posted today too with photos. thats an old photo in the OP
That's a picture from after they painted the field for the 2018 spring game.
Meximan said:
I don't think greg understands what dehumanization means.
Means you'll win the argument rather than caring about the discussion. Similar to using ridicule in a similar way.
I could handle the new gay sign if they'd just put TEXAS AGGIES in the endzones.
But they won't.
But they won't.
Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting.
Steve McQueen
Steve McQueen
It's on the next level up and it still looks the same as last year.
There was a strong and confident consensus among Ags who parked their conveyances at the Astin Terminal for the lsu game that the crap sign would be replaced during the summer.FriscoKid said:rbcs_2 said:
I'm missing something. Why would we want the old signs up?
Cause the new one looked like crap.
Yelnick McWawa said:
A) Critical thinking skills people. It's obviously an old picture.
B) It's embarrassing how many of you see stuff like this and draw conclusions like the OP. Same with obvious satirical material (Jimbo going by James, the 7 foot, 500 pound TE, etc.). Bunch of rubes!
C) The new signage looks infinitely better than the old one, they just need to complete the gun metal gray paneling to cover up the exposed concrete and find a way to make the lettering stand out a bit more during the day.
D) BTHOEveryone in 2019!
E) TGIF
So, cover up the grey concrete with grey lettering. Fantastic idea.
Rube.
I had to think about this one for a minute before deciphering your meaning that you hang out with rich guys who own aeroplanes and the lettering on the sign is for some reason important to them after attending one game. Did I get that right?Quote:
There was a strong and confident consensus among Ags who parked their conveyances at the Astin Terminal for the lsu game that the crap sign would be replaced during the summer.
Social Media Influencer said:I had to think about this one for a minute before deciphering your meaning that you hang out with rich guys who own aeroplanes and the lettering on the sign is for some reason important to them after attending one game. Did I get that right?Quote:
There was a strong and confident consensus among Ags who parked their conveyances at the Astin Terminal for the lsu game that the crap sign would be replaced during the summer.
I could see it being even more important to people who have donated a lot of money for Kyle's renovations. Why donate money to make something look worse?
I know reading and basic logic are difficult for you as evidenced by your pathetic posting history so I'll help you a bit....I'll even type extra slow.Lateralus Ag said:Yelnick McWawa said:
A) Critical thinking skills people. It's obviously an old picture.
B) It's embarrassing how many of you see stuff like this and draw conclusions like the OP. Same with obvious satirical material (Jimbo going by James, the 7 foot, 500 pound TE, etc.). Bunch of rubes!
C) The new signage looks infinitely better than the old one, they just need to complete the gun metal gray paneling to cover up the exposed concrete and find a way to make the lettering stand out a bit more during the day.
D) BTHOEveryone in 2019!
E) TGIF
So, cover up the grey concrete with grey lettering. Fantastic idea.
Rube.
Go re-read item C. Read it slow, it's okay. Then pull your head from your rectum and understand that those letters and words convey the opinion that the grey paneling needs to be continued to cover the exposed concrete. No one is discussing making the lettering grey, dummy.
You are absolutely insufferable.
Yelnick McWawa said:I know reading and basic logic are difficult for you as evidenced by your pathetic posting history so I'll help you a bit....I'll even type extra slow.Lateralus Ag said:Yelnick McWawa said:
A) Critical thinking skills people. It's obviously an old picture.
B) It's embarrassing how many of you see stuff like this and draw conclusions like the OP. Same with obvious satirical material (Jimbo going by James, the 7 foot, 500 pound TE, etc.). Bunch of rubes!
C) The new signage looks infinitely better than the old one, they just need to complete the gun metal gray paneling to cover up the exposed concrete and find a way to make the lettering stand out a bit more during the day.
D) BTHOEveryone in 2019!
E) TGIF
So, cover up the grey concrete with grey lettering. Fantastic idea.
Rube.
Go re-read item C. Read it slow, it's okay. Then pull your head from your rectum and understand that those letters and words convey the opinion that the grey paneling needs to be continued to cover the exposed concrete. No one is discussing making the lettering grey, dummy.
You are absolutely insufferable.
Living rent free in your head: priceless.
And you still didn't respond to my point.
And you literally suggested "completing" the letters in grey.
Moron.
Moron.
Lateralus Ag said:
And you literally suggested "completing" the letters in grey.
Moron.
You really, truly are a special kind of stupid. Tripled down on it in the same thread.
Featured Stories
See All
OK, Boomer: Old hallmarks still vital to winning football games
by Olin Buchanan
12:20
1d ago
8.0k
25:24
3h ago
830
Logan Lee chats about A&M hoops' highs and lows as SEC play rolls on
by Ryan Brauninger
40:22
2h ago
526
The Fan Show sponsored by PrizePicks
by Ryan Brauninger
Around the SEC: Recruiting News & Trends
by Jason Howell
Colonel Ingus
What would it cost to assemble the best players in college football….
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
43
KillerAg21
What would it cost to assemble the best players in college football….
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
35