ClassOf17 said:

---

Still more accurate than CNN

---

Could be!

Truth

Fact

Drunks

It does kinda make you wonder if this year's perception of Sumlin would be different if Starkel hadn't got hurt....
Granted, he doesn't have Mond's feet, but he reads Ds better, releases quicker.....may not have had to rely on feet so much, if at all.....opens up run game.....

-UCLA - highly likely a W
-ULaLa and Nichols - blowouts
-Arky, SCar - bigger spreads?
-Bama - hmmmmmm.....
-UF - prob handles swamp better, bigger spread
-MsSt - theyre good, but at this point from a comfort/efficiency standpoint, he'll have played a LOT of ball....
-Aub - more like a 50/50 game

Would the mob of torches and pitchforks still be gathering??
I see several coaches across the country who are really struggling to make ANYTHING work without their starting QB (....cough....Jimbo....cough, cough....)

Nah.

Doesn't matter if Brady is QB- we're going to find a way to go 8-4.

Case of Natty Lite

Probably not but I will give you that Sumlin probably keeps his job.

With our offensive line?

Even with a great quarterback,we would still struggle even in the SEC West.

What ifs are for losers.

Starkel, not Starkle.