Rascal said:

---

Anyone ever used it?

Worth a shot especially against the likes of LSU, Arky,, and even UCLA who run the ball more or who have a more pro style offense? Might help to negate our lack of depth at LB and utilize our athleticism/speed.

Put the NG at a 0 technique, with both DT's at a 3 technique, and both DE's at a 5 technique (6 if TE to their side)

Here is who I would line up with:

NG- Mack / Moton
DT- Keke / Peevy
DT- Henderson / Rogers
DE- Johnson / Robinson
DE- Madabuke / Clemons
LB- Dodson / Olaka / Hines
S/LB "Rover"- Howard / Okeke / Dunning / Buddy Johnson / Cunningham (rotating depending on Offense package- heavy run vs heavy pass)
SS- Watts
FS- Wilson
CB- Willis
CB- Oliver

Thoughts?

---

DE need to be Jacks, I see one traditional Jack in your line up.

We should line up two jokers...at the same time.

bigtupy said:

---

I was thinking more along the lines of 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 defense. Single file.

---

I laughed way too much at this

Predmid said:

---

Dub05 said:

---

I'm thinking that the 7-3-4 is even better

---

Oh yeah? Well, Why not go full Satan Defense and go with the 6-6-6!

Can't lose!

---

Devilish D Line, Lucifer linebackers and satanic secondary

Run the 0-1-0. One dude. One bad ass dude. Stuffs the run on first down. Sacks the QB on second down. Bats down the pass on third down. Now, the only issue is when its time for them to punt, he best block the punt or tackle the punter. Just imagine how demoralizing it would be to be stopped by a one man defense.