quote:

---

#Best5-7teamInTheNation

---

On point.

quote:

---

quote:

---

And we "never really win anything" other than say, more conference titles than you since teams weren't composed of all white players.

---

what year do you want to start counting?

---

Why didn't you answer my first question?

quote:

---

The lustre of 2012 is getting a little worn, too.

Since 2010, Texas and A&M have the same number of division and conference championships.

---

Oh look who is here. It is the limp ****, whorn poster boy for sodomy. Since 2010 tu has had three losing season, including two straight most recently. A&M has won 9, 7,11, 9, 8, and 8 games. Those aren't even comparable you stupid A&M obsessed goof.

You look like a fool trying to talk smack on this board coming off back to back losing seasons. Congrats on a recruiting "victory." I am sure it will keep the whorns warm at night on the heals of another losing season.

How is it even possible to realistically believe you can talk effective smack with two back to back losing seasons?
TU Sips would have a hard time trying to beat Texas State right now.

The only positive for the Sips is that their new coach next year can only go up and will have some talent in the cupboard to work with.

Good luck in Women's Softball, silly Sips!

The Phillies and the Mets won exactly the same number of World Series Championships last year.

quote:

---

How is it even possible to realistically believe you can talk effective smack with two back to back losing seasons?

---

Because they are scab eating, mouth breathing, products of incest. They have an unhealthy devotion (like constantly posting on another school's messageboard to defend the e-honor of tu) to the whorns because their moms tried to suffocate them in the cribs with a dirty tu shirt from wal-mart. Unfortunately, for us their moms failed and they became devoted whorns.

quote:

---

quote:

---

The lustre of 2012 is getting a little worn, too.

Since 2010, Texas and A&M have the same number of division and conference championships.

---

In completely, absolutely not in the same hemisphere leagues.

---

You were in the same league for part of that time.

Texas is definitely down. That's the point. Look how little more than Texas you have accomplished while riding high on swag and JFF. You ain't done much.

It wouldn't even be fair to compare Texas to A&M when both teams are good. When Texas is good they live in the top ten and are in the championship discussion. We even win them every once in a while.

Even down, you don't have much to brag about over Texas when you're supposedly up.

And it's going to get worse for you as it gets better for Texas. The shrillness of the answers to my post reveal the worry. You're right to worry.

Have a nice NSD then spring ball where you get to choose between two BDF reject QBs. Ought to be great.

quote:

---

quote:

---

You were in the same league for part of that time.

---

And lots of hobos were in that hoor you call a mom, all the time. Unfortunately, you resulted.

---

See what I mean? Shrill, frothing, fearful.

quote:

---

Have a nice NSD then spring ball where you get to choose between two BDF reject QBs. Ought to be great.

---

One of those "BDF rejects" defeated your beloved longhorns in his only start against them, so I would be careful who you call a reject.

Bye, felicia.

quote:

---

See what I mean? Shrill, frothing, fearful.

---

Yeah maybe I will get to the point where I will feel compelled to POST OVER 3,000 TIMES on another team's messageboard to defend my school's e-honor.

quote:

---

Have a nice NSD then spring ball where you get to choose between two BDF reject QBs. Ought to be great.

---

Hey chicken****, if you think our QB situation is so bad, then why don't you take me up on my bet on who will have a better season, A&M or tu? I say A&M. Why don't you put something down you freaking coward troll. You can bet me anything. I just want you to never post here again (of course I know your obsessed whorn troll ass will be back here under another username) . How about you take me up on it, you alligator mouthed, canary assed piece of roach excrement.

They can have all those recruits. It's not like he will develop or do anything with them that will help them reach their NFL career dreams.



#ThereAreNoTrophiesOnNSD

Why is there chest puffing? What did I miss? Did a tu player rescue a woman from being raped by the Baylor OLINE or something?

quote:

---

tu record since 2012:

2012: 9-4 (W bowl)
2013: 8-5 (L bowl)
2014: 6-7 (L bowl)
2015: 5-7 (NO BOWL)

....And we are supposed to believe they have 'momentum' and are on the up? Seems like regression (worse than ours) to me....

---

looks like a helluva a downhill momentum to me

Your post is so full of dillusion its not even funny. I'll give sips credit; their non-stop hubris can trick good recruits from time to time.

quote:

---

Texas is definitely down. That's the point. Look how little more than Texas you have accomplished while riding high on swag and JFF. You ain't done much.

It wouldn't even be fair to compare Texas to A&M when both teams are good. When Texas is good they live in the top ten and are in the championship discussion. We even win them every once in a while.

Even down, you don't have much to brag about over Texas when you're supposedly up.

And it's going to get worse for you as it gets better for Texas. The shrillness of the answers to my post reveal the worry. You're right to worry.

Have a nice NSD then spring ball where you get to choose between two BDF reject QBs. Ought to be great.

---

horn has been "good" for (3) blips of the radar. Everything prior to 1974 is fun to talk about but needs to be understood that it was a completely different environment before scholarship limits, especially considering how hard nutless horn worked to keep TAMU down.

Mack brown was probably the best coach in your history, see scholarship limits again for why DKR shouldn't be considered, and you fired him for chuck strong. HA.

since 1973 TAMU has had 6 losing seasons, horn 8.

quote:

---

quote:

---

tu record since 2012:

2012: 9-4 (W bowl)
2013: 8-5 (L bowl)
2014: 6-7 (L bowl)
2015: 5-7 (NO BOWL)

....And we are supposed to believe they have 'momentum' and are on the up? Seems like regression (worse than ours) to me....

---

looks like a helluva a downhill momentum to me

---

almost trend like

It's actually 7 years ago not 5.

Exactly. Hence the sarcasm.

quote:

---

It's actually 7 years ago not 5.

---

Anddddd the last time TAMU had a conference championship was the year Ricky Williams got drafted #5 overall....

Ah!!! Roger that...missed the sarcasm.

quote:

---

quote:

---

Texas is definitely down. That's the point. Look how little more than Texas you have accomplished while riding high on swag and JFF. You ain't done much.

It wouldn't even be fair to compare Texas to A&M when both teams are good. When Texas is good they live in the top ten and are in the championship discussion. We even win them every once in a while.

Even down, you don't have much to brag about over Texas when you're supposedly up.

And it's going to get worse for you as it gets better for Texas. The shrillness of the answers to my post reveal the worry. You're right to worry.

Have a nice NSD then spring ball where you get to choose between two BDF reject QBs. Ought to be great.

---

horn has been "good" for (3) blips of the radar. Everything prior to 1974 is fun to talk about but needs to be understood that it was a completely different environment before scholarship limits, especially considering how hard nutless horn worked to keep TAMU down.

Mack brown was probably the best coach in your history, see scholarship limits again for why DKR shouldn't be considered, and you fired him for chuck strong. HA.

since 1973 TAMU has had 6 losing seasons, horn 8.

---

The SWC had scholarship limits since the mid 60s.

Look don't beat me up. I grew up playing College FB at a school a little further out east from A&M, then coached. I'm on this board only to follow football at A&M while I'm back in med school. Miss the college game a little. The Texas/Texas A&M has been bloody for a long long time. The problem with these arguments is you can't really settle them on the field anymore. I think people are sleeping on the fact of what A&M has coming back next year. It's going to up to the the coaches to make it work. As for Texas, their staff has really worked hard recruiting. You can see that. Getting the commits with the past two years they have had says something. Again, they are going to have to do it on the field. Teams change every year. You never know how a team is going to be. The SEC is a competitive conference but I believe they need to play tougher out of conference opponents IMO. The Big 12 is still tough because the state of Texas feeds that conference. I kinda think the conference cheering is a little short sighted it's about what you do in that conference.

I think as far as college coaches go for Texas Darrel Royal is pretty much the best they had. Met the guy once, made me want to put my pads back on.

Bought stars on Texags. Pathetic sip.

Are my eyes deceiving me or are whorn trolls buying stars? How messed up do you have to be to be a whorn who is paying money to an A&M site just to troll it.

quote:

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

Texas is definitely down. That's the point. Look how little more than Texas you have accomplished while riding high on swag and JFF. You ain't done much.

It wouldn't even be fair to compare Texas to A&M when both teams are good. When Texas is good they live in the top ten and are in the championship discussion. We even win them every once in a while.

Even down, you don't have much to brag about over Texas when you're supposedly up.

And it's going to get worse for you as it gets better for Texas. The shrillness of the answers to my post reveal the worry. You're right to worry.

Have a nice NSD then spring ball where you get to choose between two BDF reject QBs. Ought to be great.

---

horn has been "good" for (3) blips of the radar. Everything prior to 1974 is fun to talk about but needs to be understood that it was a completely different environment before scholarship limits, especially considering how hard nutless horn worked to keep TAMU down.

Mack brown was probably the best coach in your history, see scholarship limits again for why DKR shouldn't be considered, and you fired him for chuck strong. HA.

since 1973 TAMU has had 6 losing seasons, horn 8.

---

The SWC had scholarship limits since the mid 60s.

---

1974 Texas Monthly doesn;t seem to think so

http://www.texasmonthly.com/the-culture/the-decline-and-fall-of-the-southwest-conference/

quote:

---

Another rules change may have a more positive impact. Last year the NCAA imposed an annual limit of 30 scholarships for football and placed similar restrictions on other sports. The scholarship limit is intended to combat spiraling costs, but in the Southwest Conference the new rule may have the additional effect of restoring balance to the league. This is the hope of many private school backers who recognize that the scholarship limit may be the last chance for their schools to regain parity.

Most of the private schools, as their followers point out, couldn't afford to recruit many more than 30 football players before the NCAA reduced the scholarship limit, so the new ceiling won't hurt their football programs. But Texas and the other state schools have been bringing in closer to 50 players a year. Because of the scholarship limit, between fifteen and twenty boys who might otherwise have signed with Texas will have to go elsewhere. The state schools will no longer monopolize all the talent, and the private schools will be able to supplement their teams with players who in other years were good enough to play for Texas.

---

quote:

---

1974 Texas Monthly doesn;t seem to think so

---

You know better than to question texags pathetic whorn troll #163,402, texan76, on his knowledge of scholarship limits.

quote:

---

Bought stars on Texags. Pathetic sip.

---

lmao.

It's gotten so bad that signing day is all there is left to care about. Have to care about it so much he went and subscribed to TexAgs. I'm not dumb, our success history isn't what Texas' is and I wish we'd stumble into a natty or even conference championship here and there, but man... I almost feel bad for you right now.

Stop entertaining the tu trolls. Stop making arguments based on our respective histories that we are going to lose every time. It's pointless and counterproductive. Past is past. Focus on this season and tomorrow's class.
If they finish ahead of us in the recruiting rankings then feel free to flame away but only for a few days. Everything starts over in August. They have their own problems. And we sure have ours.

quote:

---

Draft Picks since Ags Joined the SEC:

A&M - 14
tu - 11

---

ALABAMA 7-1-1
Texas vs. TEXAS A&M 76-37-5
Texas vs. LSU 9-7-1
Texas vs. MISS ST. 2-2-0
Texas vs. OLE MISS 6-2-0
Texas vs. ARKANSAS 56-22-0
Texas vs. AUBURN 5-3-0
Texas vs. GEORGIA 3-1-0
Texas vs. FLORIDA 2-0-1
Texas vs. S. CAROLINA 0-1-0 https://texas.forums.rivals.com/styles/default/xenforo/clear.png
Texas vs. MISSOURI 17-6-0
Texas vs. TENNESSEE 2-1-0
Texas vs. KENTUCKY 1-0-0
Texas vs. VANDERBILT 3-8-1 https://texas.forums.rivals.com/styles/default/xenforo/clear.png

quote:

---

---

Registered today and paid for access on rival site to post this

LISTEN.

While most of us Ags are having relevant, up-to-date discussions on current football affairs, you stronghorns can only talk about things that happened 10+ years ago, in previous conference eras, or with previous coaching staffs. Not a good look.

If you have ANY arguments that affect the current eras at both schools (within the past 5 years), please share them. Otherwise, keep churning that butter and jabbering on about "the good ole days". We think it's adorable.

quote:

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

Texas is definitely down. That's the point. Look how little more than Texas you have accomplished while riding high on swag and JFF. You ain't done much.

It wouldn't even be fair to compare Texas to A&M when both teams are good. When Texas is good they live in the top ten and are in the championship discussion. We even win them every once in a while.

Even down, you don't have much to brag about over Texas when you're supposedly up.

And it's going to get worse for you as it gets better for Texas. The shrillness of the answers to my post reveal the worry. You're right to worry.

Have a nice NSD then spring ball where you get to choose between two BDF reject QBs. Ought to be great.

---

horn has been "good" for (3) blips of the radar. Everything prior to 1974 is fun to talk about but needs to be understood that it was a completely different environment before scholarship limits, especially considering how hard nutless horn worked to keep TAMU down.

Mack brown was probably the best coach in your history, see scholarship limits again for why DKR shouldn't be considered, and you fired him for chuck strong. HA.

since 1973 TAMU has had 6 losing seasons, horn 8.

---

The SWC had scholarship limits since the mid 60s.

---

1974 Texas Monthly doesn;t seem to think so

http://www.texasmonthly.com/the-culture/the-decline-and-fall-of-the-southwest-conference/

quote:

---

Another rules change may have a more positive impact. Last year the NCAA imposed an annual limit of 30 scholarships for football and placed similar restrictions on other sports. The scholarship limit is intended to combat spiraling costs, but in the Southwest Conference the new rule may have the additional effect of restoring balance to the league. This is the hope of many private school backers who recognize that the scholarship limit may be the last chance for their schools to regain parity.

Most of the private schools, as their followers point out, couldn't afford to recruit many more than 30 football players before the NCAA reduced the scholarship limit, so the new ceiling won't hurt their football programs. But Texas and the other state schools have been bringing in closer to 50 players a year. Because of the scholarship limit, between fifteen and twenty boys who might otherwise have signed with Texas will have to go elsewhere. The state schools will no longer monopolize all the talent, and the private schools will be able to supplement their teams with players who in other years were good enough to play for Texas.

---

---

You miss this part of that article:

quote:

---

But is he right? The other state schoolsArkansas, Texas A&M, and Texas Techrecruit as many players as the Longhorns year after year, and yet they have fared little better against UT than the private schools. Southern California has limited itself to 30 scholarships for years without damaging its standing as a perennial national power. Like Texas, the Trojans win with quality, not numbers. -

See more at: http://www.texasmonthly.com/the-culture/the-decline-and-fall-of-the-southwest-conference/#sthash.f3Dwibb0.dpuf

---