Because his stats have really regressed this year. Let him fail on the field if that is the case.
quote:quote:
He could take a bunny from a little girl and kill it in front of her and people would defend him. That's the really sad part of his story.
No, this is something that 80% of us did when we were 22.
quote:quote:He told the Browns he had cleaned up his act. He told the Browns they had nothing to worry about moving forward. He lied.quote:
He could take a bunny from a little girl and kill it in front of her and people would defend him. That's the really sad part of his story.
Terrible example. Besides, what is there to defend? Going out on an off week?
It is not about this one incident. It is about a track record of behavior proving to the Browns that they cannot trust him with the keys to their team. It is a "trust" issue, not a legal issue, or even a right/wrong issue.
quote:quote:quote:He told the Browns he had cleaned up his act. He told the Browns they had nothing to worry about moving forward. He lied.quote:
He could take a bunny from a little girl and kill it in front of her and people would defend him. That's the really sad part of his story.
Terrible example. Besides, what is there to defend? Going out on an off week?
It is not about this one incident. It is about a track record of behavior proving to the Browns that they cannot trust him with the keys to their team. It is a "trust" issue, not a legal issue, or even a right/wrong issue.
In what way did Johnny behavior reflect poorly on the organization and specifically, how did it hurt his or his teams performance?
Are you suggesting that Johnny can't have an alcoholic drink in public on his off weeks? Can he not show himself to be having fun with alcohol? Exactly what behavior is forbidden for Johnny? Is this Johnny's rule and does it apply to the other players on his team?
I see a ton of professional athletes getting drunk and partying at bars and strip clubs all the time. Why is Johnny being made an example of and not the other significant majority of other pro athletes who like to party?
I think it's unfair to call him an idiot for letting himself get caught doing something that shouldnt warrant such ridicule. The only idiots here are the ones who have it out for Johnny and have so since he was at A&M and most of all A&M alumni who buy into the witch hunt propaganda spewed to tarnish his reputation and diminish any positive impact his success A&M has brought. I'm proud of what Johnny did at and for A&M. Wouldnt change it for anything. If I was him, I would demand a trade. He is clearly playing for s coach that isn't on his side. You want to talk about trust. How can Johnny trust his own head coach after everything he has said and done to him over the past 2 years.
quote:
Political correctness and liberalism (nice word for socialism) is what is behind this. Did he harm himself or someone else during or after his party? Was he responsible and found a safe way "home" and sleep it off? Give up your ideas, they have won. Vote democrat, give up your rights and be part of the "community"!
quote:Simple. Because he let it affect his preparedness, performance, and work ethic all last year. Thus, the Browns are not going to give him any slack, especially after going to rehab for it, and promising them he would clean up his act. So yes, he is held to a different standard, which is also his fault.quote:quote:quote:He told the Browns he had cleaned up his act. He told the Browns they had nothing to worry about moving forward. He lied.quote:
He could take a bunny from a little girl and kill it in front of her and people would defend him. That's the really sad part of his story.
Terrible example. Besides, what is there to defend? Going out on an off week?
It is not about this one incident. It is about a track record of behavior proving to the Browns that they cannot trust him with the keys to their team. It is a "trust" issue, not a legal issue, or even a right/wrong issue.
In what way did Johnny behavior reflect poorly on the organization and specifically, how did it hurt his or his teams performance?
Are you suggesting that Johnny can't have an alcoholic drink in public on his off weeks? Can he not show himself to be having fun with alcohol? Exactly what behavior is forbidden for Johnny? Is this Johnny's rule and does it apply to the other players on his team?
I see a ton of professional athletes getting drunk and partying at bars and strip clubs all the time. Why is Johnny being made an example of and not the other significant majority of other pro athletes who like to party?
I think it's unfair to call him an idiot for letting himself get caught doing something that shouldnt warrant such ridicule. The only idiots here are the ones who have it out for Johnny and have so since he was at A&M and most of all A&M alumni who buy into the witch hunt propaganda spewed to tarnish his reputation and diminish any positive impact his success A&M has brought. I'm proud of what Johnny did at and for A&M. Wouldnt change it for anything. If I was him, I would demand a trade. He is clearly playing for s coach that isn't on his side. You want to talk about trust. How can Johnny trust his own head coach after everything he has said and done to him over the past 2 years.
quote:I think Johnny has already reached this outcome. More than likely, the decision has already been made with the actual firing taking place at the end of the season.
JFF is working towards the second outcome.
quote:That was likely the one pass they were willing to give him this year.
But the Browns are ok with starting him after a woman he was with tried to throw herself from a car mid-argument?
It's either a morality play by the Browns of he broke a verbal agreement he had with the coaching staff.
quote:This.
It is not about this one incident. It is about a track record of behavior proving to the Browns that they cannot trust him with the keys to their team. It is a "trust" issue, not a legal issue, or even a right/wrong issue.
quote:Has Johnny been a Boy Scout?? Hell, no.
Also, as has been mentioned, we don't know what else has gone into this decision. There is only one thing that we do know. This is 100% on Manziel. It's astounding just how "invisible and bullet proof" someone can think they are. Either that, or he just doesn't care. And given that with the money he's made and his family wealth the one understandable thing would be him just not caring.
quote:quote:
He could take a bunny from a little girl and kill it in front of her and people would defend him. That's the really sad part of his story.
No, this isn't something that 80% of us did when we were 22.
quote:quote:This.
It is not about this one incident. It is about a track record of behavior proving to the Browns that they cannot trust him with the keys to their team. It is a "trust" issue, not a legal issue, or even a right/wrong issue.
The number of (I assume) young posters on this thread who don't understand employment, responsibility and trust is astounding. The number who don't understand alcohol is astounding.
Also, as has been mentioned, we don't know what else has gone into this decision. There is only one thing that we do know. This is 100% on Manziel. It's astounding just how "invisible and bullet proof" someone can think they are. Either that, or he just doesn't care. And given that with the money he's made and his family wealth the one understandable thing would be him just not caring.
quote:
He could take a bunny from a little girl and kill it in front of her and people would defend him. That's the really sad part of his story.
quote:quote:quote:This.
It is not about this one incident. It is about a track record of behavior proving to the Browns that they cannot trust him with the keys to their team. It is a "trust" issue, not a legal issue, or even a right/wrong issue.
The number of (I assume) young posters on this thread who don't understand employment, responsibility and trust is astounding. The number who don't understand alcohol is astounding.
Also, as has been mentioned, we don't know what else has gone into this decision. There is only one thing that we do know. This is 100% on Manziel. It's astounding just how "invisible and bullet proof" someone can think they are. Either that, or he just doesn't care. And given that with the money he's made and his family wealth the one understandable thing would be him just not caring.
Please educate us on alcohol.
I'm sure that you never drank alcohol the week before work, or even the day before work.
I'm sure you were never intoxicated the week before work, or even the day before work.
Johnny went out the week before work. Not even sure he was intoxicated.
This holier than thou argument is really comical- I would even say "astounding."
Cecil- assuming from the post that you are in management- when is the last time you searched/reviewed social media to investigate drinking of your employees in their off-time? I'll guess never. And if you have- did you ever suspend that employee for their off-time drinking? Probably sounds astounding to even ask those questions because it is astounding to consider a manager doing that.
Because it's the employee's own free time. Anyone in real business cares about performance.
Also- and this is a real newsflash- the NFL is a business. It's about winning games.
I don't see many moral leaders on the sidelines of any NFL game.
So WTF is all this talk from the Browns as if they are running a church organization about being the "face" or about "trust?" What exactly are they actually needing to trust him with?
The only trust they need is that he is the best QB for their team (short of criminal issues which he has none). Period. And his performance has warranted him to play.
Have him go out, win games, and provide entertainment. The NFL is about NOTHING more than that.
This has everything to do with holier-than-thou NFL team management being butt hurt over Johnny not doing exactly what they say- regardless of any double standard for other players and regardless of whether it has any effect on his performance on the field. (And no- there has been no evidence I'm aware of that he has shown up in any manner affected by alcohol to practices/games/meetings or that he isn't practicing/preparing to expectations).
quote:
No, this isn't something that 80% of us did when we were 22.
quote:...and we're ridiculing them for their stupid and arbitrary rule setting.quote:quote:quote:This.
It is not about this one incident. It is about a track record of behavior proving to the Browns that they cannot trust him with the keys to their team. It is a "trust" issue, not a legal issue, or even a right/wrong issue.
The number of (I assume) young posters on this thread who don't understand employment, responsibility and trust is astounding. The number who don't understand alcohol is astounding.
Also, as has been mentioned, we don't know what else has gone into this decision. There is only one thing that we do know. This is 100% on Manziel. It's astounding just how "invisible and bullet proof" someone can think they are. Either that, or he just doesn't care. And given that with the money he's made and his family wealth the one understandable thing would be him just not caring.
Please educate us on alcohol.
I'm sure that you never drank alcohol the week before work, or even the day before work.
I'm sure you were never intoxicated the week before work, or even the day before work.
Johnny went out the week before work. Not even sure he was intoxicated.
This holier than thou argument is really comical- I would even say "astounding."
Cecil- assuming from the post that you are in management- when is the last time you searched/reviewed social media to investigate drinking of your employees in their off-time? I'll guess never. And if you have- did you ever suspend that employee for their off-time drinking? Probably sounds astounding to even ask those questions because it is astounding to consider a manager doing that.
Because it's the employee's own free time. Anyone in real business cares about performance.
Also- and this is a real newsflash- the NFL is a business. It's about winning games.
I don't see many moral leaders on the sidelines of any NFL game.
So WTF is all this talk from the Browns as if they are running a church organization about being the "face" or about "trust?" What exactly are they actually needing to trust him with?
The only trust they need is that he is the best QB for their team (short of criminal issues which he has none). Period. And his performance has warranted him to play.
Have him go out, win games, and provide entertainment. The NFL is about NOTHING more than that.
This has everything to do with holier-than-thou NFL team management being butt hurt over Johnny not doing exactly what they say- regardless of any double standard for other players and regardless of whether it has any effect on his performance on the field. (And no- there has been no evidence I'm aware of that he has shown up in any manner affected by alcohol to practices/games/meetings or that he isn't practicing/preparing to expectations).
All what you say is true......but they are the owners and they set the rules. It may not be fair but that is the way it works the world.
quote:he's "blowing it" because the browns have decided that he's the only one in the NFL that can't go to a bar on his off week. which is pretty hilarious. they went from thinking he was good enough to be their best chances to get the most wins the rest of the season to the third best option. for going to a bar. think about that. how nonsensical is that?
I find it hard to believe that the apologists for him are really serious at this point.
He's BLOWING IT!!! Don't you guys understand that? It is no one's fault but his own at this point.