All things won't be equal between baylor and tcu. They have a top 25 Minnesota baylor has buffalo and baylor has a loss to a 5 loss team
quote:But in a scenario where Ohio St wins (tough game), Fla St wins (who knows with them.....) and TCU wins (probable), a two loss bama or oregon would not be in ahead of those schools.
expect this top 4 on Tuesday:
1. Bama
2. Oregon
3. FSU
4. TCU
but if Ohio State beats Wisconsin with their 3rd string QB -- the Buckeyes will move to #4.
interesting though -- not sure Bama, Oregon, or FSU would be eliminated with a loss next week. They may have already clinched a spot.
even a 2-loss Bama or 2-loss Oregon that has played an extra game would be ranked ahead of Baylor IMO
quote:
Baylor's non-conf schedule. Heard MANY analysts comment on it and that the committee does not look favorably on them.
quote:quote:
Baylor's non-conf schedule. Heard MANY analysts comment on it and that the committee does not look favorably on them.
Well, that and their in-conference schedule.
quote:
I believe TCU is better than Baylor. But, if the both finish 11-1, Baylor has to go. Head to lead has to be the deciding factor with equal records. Of course, the Bears may not bear KS.
quote:
I believe TCU is better than Baylor. But, if the both finish 11-1, Baylor has to go. Head to lead has to be the deciding factor with equal records. Of course, the Bears may not bear KS.
quote:
The committee already doesn't care about the head to head
quote:WRONG. Remember its the entire resume, not just head to head. Baylor's SOS is laughable. They beat down nobody's. And the skeleton in their closet is the loss to WVU(who has 5 losses) and by 14 pts at that. That is being looked upon very unfavorably. This is why TCu is getting the nod. And TCu's loss was by 2 on the road against Baylor.
I believe TCU is better than Baylor. But, if the both finish 11-1, Baylor has to go. Head to lead has to be the deciding factor with equal records. Of course, the Bears may not bear KS.
quote:
Say we tie Bama @ 11-1. The beat USC, osu & OU in non con. We beat Lamar, Rice & Sam but we beat Bama at Kyle by 1. Witch team would you move into the playoff.
quote:
If our loss was to a ****ty team and bama barely lost to us, while they had a much better SOS, they should go.
quote:
So why did we bother to play.
quote:
So why did we bother to play.
quote:quote:
So why did we bother to play.
To establish part of the overall body of work. Would this matter if there were 8 teams in the playoff? No.
Edit - we would be talking about #'s 9 &10 though.
quote:This.
-TCU lost on the road by a FG at the very end of the game (after some very dubious officiating that even the commentators pointed out). Baylor lost by 2TDs to a 7-5 West Virginia team.
-TCU has a considerably better SoS due to smacking around a ranked Minnesota team in non-conf.
Not a huge difference, but you have to make decisions based on something
quote:quote:WRONG. Remember its the entire resume, not just head to head. Baylor's SOS is laughable. They beat down nobody's. And the skeleton in their closet is the loss to WVU(who has 5 losses) and by 14 pts at that. That is being looked upon very unfavorably. This is why TCu is getting the nod. And TCu's loss was by 2 on the road against Baylor.
I believe TCU is better than Baylor. But, if the both finish 11-1, Baylor has to go. Head to lead has to be the deciding factor with equal records. Of course, the Bears may not bear KS.
A couple of committee members have mentioned scheduling. And I hope they mean what they say when they say it will matter.
The idea that you can just schedule 3 cupcakes--though, honestly, to call the teams Baylor played cupcakes is even being charitable--and count on conference wins is just bull****.
quote:
I don't really see how "schedule" is even brought up when discussing these two teams in comparison to one another. TCU and Baylor played schedules that are as identical to each other as is possible really.