Looking to have a LASIK procedure done soon and curious in recommendations you may have for doctors or clinics. Thanks
Never heard this one before.agdoc2001 said:
3. If you are over 50, you are probably too old for LASIK and should wait for cataract surgery instead
Booma94 said:Never heard this one before.agdoc2001 said:
3. If you are over 50, you are probably too old for LASIK and should wait for cataract surgery instead
agdoc2001 said:Booma94 said:Never heard this one before.agdoc2001 said:
3. If you are over 50, you are probably too old for LASIK and should wait for cataract surgery instead
It's not really a hard rule - the problem is presbyopia. So say you are 55, nearsighted, and wear bifocals. If you have LASIK, you will still need readers for close vision, just nothing for distance. So you spent 4k and are still in glasses 50% of the time. (Unless you can tolerate monovision)
I went to Berkley Eye in Kingwood and because I haven't lost my reading yet, they suggested I only get one eye done if I could deal with monovision.agdoc2001 said:Booma94 said:Never heard this one before.agdoc2001 said:
3. If you are over 50, you are probably too old for LASIK and should wait for cataract surgery instead
It's not really a hard rule - the problem is presbyopia. So say you are 55, nearsighted, and wear bifocals. If you have LASIK, you will still need readers for close vision, just nothing for distance. So you spent 4k and are still in glasses 50% of the time. (Unless you can tolerate monovision)
AVOID DR DELL!!!!!!!!!Ghost of Bisbee said:
Great advice all, thanks.
I have an eval at Mann Eye tomorrow.
They told me you don't see an opthalmologist until surgery day who "reviews charts" beforehand. Optometrist for the first two.
I've heard good things about Dr Dell in Austin. I might try getting an appt for 2nd opinion
Right - so if you had LASIK in both eyes, it would just reverse that. You'd use glasses for reading rather than distance. Only solution would be to have only 1 eye done for monovision (if your brain can tolerate it) or to wait and have cataract surgery or a refractive lens exchange.infinity ag said:agdoc2001 said:Booma94 said:Never heard this one before.agdoc2001 said:
3. If you are over 50, you are probably too old for LASIK and should wait for cataract surgery instead
It's not really a hard rule - the problem is presbyopia. So say you are 55, nearsighted, and wear bifocals. If you have LASIK, you will still need readers for close vision, just nothing for distance. So you spent 4k and are still in glasses 50% of the time. (Unless you can tolerate monovision)
I need glasses for far. Nothing for close/reading. Most of my friends need reading glasses.
agdoc2001 said:AVOID DR DELL!!!!!!!!!Ghost of Bisbee said:
Great advice all, thanks.
I have an eval at Mann Eye tomorrow.
They told me you don't see an opthalmologist until surgery day who "reviews charts" beforehand. Optometrist for the first two.
I've heard good things about Dr Dell in Austin. I might try getting an appt for 2nd opinion
This is who my eye doctor referred me to. In the process of saving up.rancher1953 said:
Hands down Dr. Jeff Whitsett in Houston. He is the best, you will thank me later.