Health & Fitness
Sponsored by

Vaccine hesitant thread

9,046 Views | 56 Replies | Last: 7 mo ago by ladyfriend
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So I'm getting tired of dealing with vaccine refusing/hesitant families. While watching the ags vs akry baseball I typed up a response to a F16 thread and figured I would post it here just for folks with questions and interested in discussion.

Anyway here is my 20+ years of frontline practice professional opinions on specific vaccines.

Hepatitis B- important if mom had Hep B but if they had normal prenatal care we know if they have it or not. Transmission from mom to a new baby is dangerous but otherwise this is only a risk for teens/adults so it could easily be delayed until teenage. The vaccine is very safe and effective though and included in most combo shots.

DTaP- diptheria- not a horrible disease outside of the first few months but no treatment.
Tetanus- this is a no brainer. You will never get rid of tetanus, there is no treatment and nearly 100% mortality. Foolish to not protect against it.
Pertussis/Whooping cough- horrible disease in kids under 6 months, treatment doesn't help the patient just prevents transmission.

PCV- Strep pneumonia - common cause of life threatening pneumonia, brain infections, blood infections. Another no brainer. Very safe and effective.

Hib- This one is very old so despite being in practice for two decades I've never seen it. It causes aggressive brain infection and epiglottic infections. Safe and effective again a no brainer

Polio- .a very contagious but mild infection but will occasionally leave long lasting paralysis. Why anyone would leave their kid open to this is mind blowing to me. Vaccine is proven safe and effective over several decades.

Rotavirus- newish (last 15 years) vaccine given by mouth. Rota causes severe vomiting and diarrhea. In the USA this resulted in a lot of hospital stays but very rare deaths. Vaccine was really made for the developing world since they die due to lack of access to IV fluids. It is safe overall so nice way to save some $$ from er visits/hospital stays. Decreased hospital stays for dehydration by 80% in the USA.

MMR- another no brainer IMO. Measles has no treatment, causes a pretty high rate of hospitalization for pneumonia and dehydration, has a small risk of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis which you don't want to know about. Mumps is a fairly miserable illness with no treatment. Causes very swollen lymph nodes and can infect the testicles and ovaries causing sterility. If you don't want grandkids I guess that is one way to do it. Rubella is no big deal unless you are pregnant and get it then it causes heart defects in your baby.

Chicken pox/Varicella- usually not dangerous unless your kid is on chemo. Can leave long term scars. Usually lasts about 2 weeks and they have to stay home the whole time. There is a risk of secondary bacterial infection that leads to necrotizing fasciitis which you don't want. Roughly 80% effective and the ones who still get natural infection get a very mild form with < 20 lesions and no fever. Both my kids had break through infections with this.

Hepatitis A- food born illness with no treatment. Causes vomiting and jaundice. Not terribly dangerous unless you are elderly. Vaccine is nearly 100% effective and very low rate of side effects.

---------------------that is it for infant vaccines until teen years----------------

Meningitis- Neisseria meningitis. When I was training at the turn of the century this was the bane of the hospital. Very rapid very bloody very nasty deaths in healthy kids. Just morally and spiritually devastating to treat these kids. Side effects are mild and worth it to prevent this now rare disease.

TdaP- see above- do you really want tetanus in your kid?

HPV- I reccommend this around 14ish or so. Data over the last 15 years is looking really good on effectiveness and safety. It is the one and only vaccine to prevent cancer. Sure if your kid is the unicorn that has one sexual partner and is not homosexual they don't have a risk of this but that is a big big gamble with humans.

----------Seasonal/situational----------------------
COVID- only for high risk patients - those with heart or lung disease of cerebral palsy. Right now only the mRNA vaccines are approved for under 12 and their efficacy drops off dramatically after 60 days so very dubious benefit. Novavax is a nice option for high risk 12+ as it seems to last longer and have fewer side effects.

Flu- Advised for kids under 1 and those with heart/lung disease of all ages. Efficacy is pretty bad around 35% annually. Main benefit is preventing hospital stays or death in high risk patients.

No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
TitanAGGIE09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Left off a really recent one that comes to mind...
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ah thanks I'll add it! On the F16 thread I addresssed it haha.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
MRB10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have you read "The Vaccine Book" by Dr. Sears? If yes, how do you respond to parents who come in looking to delay/avoid/space out chicken pox/hep A/MMR and others?

He is also a pediatrician with 20+ years experience who claims to have done his research and came to different conclusions.
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pepper Brooks said:

Have you read "The Vaccine Book" by Dr. Sears? If yes, how do you respond to parents who come in looking to delay/avoid/space out chicken pox/hep A/MMR and others?

He is also a pediatrician with 20+ years experience who claims to have done his research and came to different conclusions.
Yes I have. There is no evidence delaying vaccine is safer or more effective. Babies' immune systems are more than capable of processing the current vaccine load.

That being said I'm happy to help with whatever vaccine schedule parents want.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
MRB10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MRB10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think what struck me most was seeing the rates of seizures and other severe reactions in the 1/100s and 1/1,000s vs much higher. The risk reward for things like hep A(unlikely to contract in modern homes/day cares with decent cleaning protocols), chickenpox, and MMR(treatable if caught and more or less isn't a concern given how few outbreaks in the US these days) doesn't seem to justify the vaccines at 1 yr if the rates are as high as he says.

Regressive autism is a touchy subject but the correlation before age 2 is hard to ignore from a parents standpoint, too.
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pepper Brooks said:

I think what struck me most was seeing the rates of seizures and other severe reactions in the 1/100s and 1/1,000s vs much higher. The risk reward for things like hep A(unlikely to contract in modern homes/day cares with decent cleaning protocols), chickenpox, and MMR(treatable if caught and more or less isn't a concern given how few outbreaks in the US these days) doesn't seem to justify the vaccines at 1 yr if the rates are as high as he says.

Regressive autism is a touchy subject but the correlation before age 2 is hard to ignore from a parents standpoint, too.

MMR is not treatable. No antivirals for any of them.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
MRB10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You're right, I was going off memory. It's the fact that there are less than 500 cases per year for each disease in the US which makes vaccinating at 1yr feel like a gamble. Considering the low case count against the 300-400M population and rates of severe reactions I alluded to previously.

(Edit: I acknowledge that comparing the case counts against the total population is not a great way to think about it as it's fair to assume a high percentage of the total pop was vaccinated at some point previously. I just haven't seen a credible number for unvaccinated(for MMR) US citizens by age. Assuming 500 cases per year, 350M people w/ a 99% vaccination rate, the rate of infection is .0001.)

I'm not saying it isn't a concern, or that we won't give our kids the vaccination, I'm just more likely to delay it and go off schedule given the above.
TxAger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shingrix?
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TxAger said:

Shingrix?
Very low risk aside from short term side effects that can be mitigated with ibuprofen or naproxen. I got it at 50 for sure as shingles is pretty miserable and can lead to long term neuropathy. In addition, I don't want to put infants I see at risk of varicella as it can be fatal for my new patients.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
bigtruckguy3500
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KidDoc said:

TxAger said:

Shingrix?
Very low risk aside from short term side effects that can be mitigated with ibuprofen or naproxen. I got it at 50 for sure as shingles is pretty miserable and can lead to long term neuropathy. In addition, I don't want to put infants I see at risk of varicella as it can be fatal for my new patients.


How many times a have you seen chicken pox in kids since vaccination became widespread? Specifically curious about the year or two before you got shingles
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Roughly 5ish cases a year, most attuneauted due to vaccine. I do see rare cases of full blown chicken pox in unvaccinated or kids under a year.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Hoosegow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is sad you even have to write something like this Doc. The problem is that many people have lost faith in the medical profession. COVID was a big blow to the credibility. There was a guy across from my church where I grew up that lived in an iron lung due to polio. I had a good friend of mine whose daughter almost died due to whooping cough. She was mis-diagnosed for a week before someone realized what was going on.

It would have to be extraordinary circumstances for me to ever take another vaccine or trust what the medical community is doing, and that is a sad thing. Quite frankly, I believe that the medical profession is being run by pharmacutical companies. You just have to turn on your television and see all the commercials for stuff you didn't even know existed.

Another example of a credibility issue is blood pressure. I'm old enough to remember when hypertension was considered 160/90. Why did it change? Could be for all the right reasons. Could be so it opens up the market to peddle more blood pressure drugs.

The medical profession has just gotten too dirty to trust.

And Doc - I hope you don't see this as a personal attack. The fact that you give your knowledge freely is VERY rare. I appreciate it - as jaded as I am.
Captain Winky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Remember when not vaccinating your kids was a dumb super liberal hippie thing and now dumb conservatives have adopted it as well. COVID really brought us closer together as a country.
10andBOUNCE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hoosegow said:

Quite frankly, I believe that the medical profession is being run by pharmacutical companies.
Ya think? The US is rare in that it even allows DTC medical advertising. Talk about red flags.
jtraggie99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is not directed to anyone on this thread just something I've noticed. But it seems like we have a certain contingent of people in this country who consistently say we have the best health care system in the world (whenever there is a discussion about making drastic changes, i.e. single-payer, etc). But at the same time, a lot of these same people seem to have a huge amount of distrust in all things health care in the US. The same people that talk about the for profit system driving innovation, but then go on about how the medical / pharma community cannot be trusted, as they put profits over people.
bigtruckguy3500
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I remember once posting on F16 about direct to consumer marketing of drugs, and how it's not good, and people lit me up because something about the free market and USA USA best healthcare in the world, etc.

Lots of cognitive dissonance.
bigtruckguy3500
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KidDoc said:

Roughly 5ish cases a year, most attuneauted due to vaccine. I do see rare cases of full blown chicken pox in unvaccinated or kids under a year.
Did you take precations to not touch the lesions? Supposedly the incidence of shingles is increasing and the idea is that maybe adults aren't getting natural boosters by periodic exposures from kids with chicken pox. I'm thinking maybe every time I see an adult with shingles I should lick it. Or at least rub it.
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bigtruckguy3500 said:

KidDoc said:

Roughly 5ish cases a year, most attuneauted due to vaccine. I do see rare cases of full blown chicken pox in unvaccinated or kids under a year.
Did you take precations to not touch the lesions? Supposedly the incidence of shingles is increasing and the idea is that maybe adults aren't getting natural boosters by periodic exposures from kids with chicken pox. I'm thinking maybe every time I see an adult with shingles I should lick it. Or at least rub it.
I'm a gen x- I'm immune to chicken pox due to natural infection back in 3rd grade.

I did get Shingrix last year though just in case!

edit: so no I did not take precautions. In fact I never wear a mask or gloves in clinic. It scares the kid and likely has little to no effect in protecting me from exposures.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
bigtruckguy3500
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh, my bad. I misread your earlier post. I thought you got shingles before you got the shingrix vaccine. Makes sense. I too am immune from primary infection.
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For the chicken pox discussion, how common is it to see Shingles in children?

My 3 year old, received the chicken pox vaccination, recently developed what we originally thought was a heat rash. However, it spread slightly after a day. He wasn't complaining of any pain and it was contained within a small portion of his left leg, so we emailed our pediatrician. She just scheduled a teledoc visit and said it was likely shingles. It started about a week ago and is already getting better. So not really concerned, but I'd never heard of shingles in children.
harge57
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KidDoc

Why do we lump so many together? It seems like its mainly for convenience for the medical field, and not necessary for the patient, and it could increase the inflammation, and make it harder to track down what part of the vaccines are causing the adverse reactions. i.e. for DTAP and MMR the case could easily be made you don't need Diphtheria or the Rubella, but they are just thrown in there.

KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
htxag09 said:

For the chicken pox discussion, how common is it to see Shingles in children?

My 3 year old, received the chicken pox vaccination, recently developed what we originally thought was a heat rash. However, it spread slightly after a day. He wasn't complaining of any pain and it was contained within a small portion of his left leg, so we emailed our pediatrician. She just scheduled a teledoc visit and said it was likely shingles. It started about a week ago and is already getting better. So not really concerned, but I'd never heard of shingles in children.
Usually this is attenuated chicken pox in a 3 year old where they get a very minor case despite vaccine. I've seen shingles but not until teens.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
harge57 said:

KidDoc

Why do we lump so many together? It seems like its mainly for convenience for the medical field, and not necessary for the patient, and it could increase the inflammation, and make it harder to track down what part of the vaccines are causing the adverse reactions. i.e. for DTAP and MMR the case could easily be made you don't need Diphtheria or the Rubella, but they are just thrown in there.


Just the way pharma developed them honestly. And to cut down on the number of physical pokes.

There is no medical/infectious disease reason for them to be clustered. The amount of antigens an infant is exposed to daily is much higher than any group of vaccines. Their immune system is made to handle lots of exposures and learn from them.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here's a pic from when it was close to the peak. I've always heard shingles were painful so asked the doctor, she said in kids it doesn't bother them at all. And it never did. The only spot he ever complained about hurting was one right at his waistband.
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Are there lesions outside of a dermatome?

What and where are dermatomes? (regenerativemedgroup.com)

Shingles will not leave the dermatome of the pain nerve it is hiding in, chicken pox will. Otherwise they look about the same. Shingles is very painful, chicken pox very itchy.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If I'm understanding the dermatomes correctly, no. The only two spots not pictured are his waste and one spot on his inner thigh. Both of which appear to be in the Lumbar dermatome group.
harge57
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not itchy at all? Poison ivy?
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
harge57 said:

Not itchy at all? Poison ivy?

Not itchy nor any pain.

Really just curiosity at this point. Already looks much better.
chet98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good informative thread. Child of a MD educated in the 70's so the "better living through chemistry" generation. Gimme all the vax you got. If I can avoid or minimize symptoms I'm all for it. Will be 49 this year and will be lining up at the doc's office for the shingles vax the day I turn 50.
AJ02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess I still don't understand the chicken pox/shingles connection.

I thought that if you'd had chicken pox naturally (not vaccinated) then you were at higher risk for developing Shingles? But your post above makes it seem that you're at higher risk for Shingles if you've had the chicken pox vaccine.

I had full on chicken pox as a kid in the 80s. No vaccine. So I've always been worried about later getting shingles. Is my risk actually lower?
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AJ02 said:

I guess I still don't understand the chicken pox/shingles connection.

I thought that if you'd had chicken pox naturally (not vaccinated) then you were at higher risk for developing Shingles? But your post above makes it seem that you're at higher risk for Shingles if you've had the chicken pox vaccine.

I had full on chicken pox as a kid in the 80s. No vaccine. So I've always been worried about later getting shingles. Is my risk actually lower?
Great question! The vaccine is now 30 years old so we are getting some people who got the vaccine as a child who are creeping into shingles risk age.

It is likely that not getting wild varicella will decrease your risk of shingles. So if you are one of the 80% who had full protection from vaccine and never got infected with the full strength virus then the virus is not laying dormant in your nervous system ready to re-activate as shingles. Of course there is the possibility that you were vaccinated then had an asymptomatic exposure and infection. Right now it doesn't appear that the cripped varicella in the vaccine re-activates as shingles but it is still being studied.

In summary it seems the varicella vaccine decreases your risk of shingles at this time.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AggieOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
all I can contribute is that shingles absolutely sucks, and I had a fairly mild case. I can't even begin to fathom what a bad case would feel like. Get the vaccine.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.