AC definitely ramped down some in my rental. Noticeable in Nashville; would not have been happy at all back home.
GM does not offer a defeat.bigtruckguy3500 said:
Drove my mom's car this past week and it was not only incredibly annoying, but made me feel very unsafe. Sometimes on heavy traffic roads I'd need to jump off the brake and shoot a gap, but as soon as I felt the engine start back up I'd press the brake again and not want to risk it. Maybe it would've done just fine, but I don't have confidence in that feeling of the engine starting as I'm about to press the gas pedal. Not to mention it shutting on/off a few dozen times in Houston traffic.
I did some googling and figured out how to "disable it" if there's no actual disable feature. If you have a transmission that has the "manual" option, shift it into manual mode and all the way to the top gear. So in my mom's malibu, I put it into L6.
I'm not in the market for a new vehicle any time soon, but I will definitely be looking for this feature and avoiding it.
I had a manual Tiguan diesel to drive around Scotland. It had this eco stop, but the same feature also kept you from killing the car. It would aggressively shut off the engine if it sensed you were about to kill it, then automatically start it up again if you pushed the clutch in.Aston 91 said:Quote:
just get a manual car.
Several years ago in Italy I rented a manual turbo diesel Mini. It had the auto start stop feature and would re-start the engine as soon as you pressed down on the clutch. As if driving in Italy wasn't unnerving enough, I had to figure out that goofy system.
Or just get an electric car.Token said:
just get a manual car.
GM tried to play this game with a giant starter/alternator/generator in their 'mild hybrid' setups, and let the starter help the car 'take off' from a stop while starting the engine.FarmerJohn said:
I'm both biased for the engineers and have direct experience, but not directly automotive. Does it use less fuel than idling? Yes. Is there more strain/wear? Yes. "Designing for it" means either more robust (i.e. expensive) components or it wears faster. I have to wonder if the extra energy used in manufacturing the components and their replacements when things wear out more than offsets the energy saved. It probably does work out to a net energy savings, but probably not enough to justify the huge expense to add this in.
Dr. Nefario said:
Does this "feature" exist on all F-150s, or just the higher trim levels?
It was on our 2016 2.7 Ecoboost and i hated it.drummer0415 said:Dr. Nefario said:
Does this "feature" exist on all F-150s, or just the higher trim levels?
I believe it's related to the engine selection, not the trim level. 2015 and 2016 f150s it was only on the 2.7 ecoboost, 2017 and up its on all engines.