Houston
Sponsored by

Stop Voting For Dan Crenshaw

3,002 Views | 32 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by texagbeliever
Marvin_Zindler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Dude caught a community note when he claimed he didn't say it.
AJ02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is it worth allowing a raging leftist to flip that seat, with no idea when or if we can flip it back in the near future, to get Crenshaw out? That's what I struggle with. Yes, I want him gone. But I can't stomach having the seat flip blue and then spend the next several decades trying to flip it back. The devil you know.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That seat would never be a raging leftist. Whoever wins Republican primary is a shoe-in for the general

We need a non-weirdo to run against him in the primary
DaShi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Costume wearing big govt goon. Has been from the beginning. Never vote for him
cajunaggie08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Him hating Tucker Carlson is why you want him gone? I thought it was a forgone conclusion that Carlson is a lying weasel.
Build It
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Crenshaw beat the market by 3X. I keep emailing him asking him to be my money manager, but I get no response?
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cajunaggie08 said:

Him hating Tucker Carlson is why you want him gone? I thought it was a forgone conclusion that Carlson is a lying weasel.
There's plenty of people blindly ok with him being a parrot for Russian propaganda.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cajunaggie08 said:

Him hating Tucker Carlson is why you want him gone? I thought it was a forgone conclusion that Carlson is a lying weasel.
I hate plenty of people. I don't say that if I ever see them I'll ****ing kill them. Which is what Crenshaw did here. Then he flat lies about it.

Take into account that he is an elected official using such rhetoric, I can see why people are tired of his **** because this isn't the first time he has lied about something he has said.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Build It said:

Crenshaw beat the market by 3X. I keep emailing him asking him to be my money manager, but I get no response?



What were the stocks?
cajunaggie08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sorry, but looking at the president I don't think any voter can be mad about a politicians rhetoric anymore without being a hypocrite themselves
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not on the hating Crenshaw bandwagon, but I have gone from having high hopes for him to being quite disappointed. He also just seems like a hot head with his numerous red flag outbursts.

7nine
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

Build It said:

Crenshaw beat the market by 3X. I keep emailing him asking him to be my money manager, but I get no response?



What were the stocks?


https://www.quiverquant.com/congresstrading/politician/Dan%20Crenshaw-C001120
7nine
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

That seat would never be a raging leftist. Whoever wins Republican primary is a shoe-in for the general

We need a non-weirdo to run against him in the primary
The primary contender needs to be pretty well funded to get their name out and get people to actually get to the polls and vote in the primary. I'm sure there are plenty of "is the devil we know worse than the devil we don't know" types that might still pull the lever in the primary.

Additionally I think the Navy Seal aspect won a lot of folks his way when he first ran. I don't know how much sway that still holds with many voters, I'm sure quite a bit. Any non-Veteran that challenges him I'm sure he'll rage that it's an assault on veterans.
Marauder Blue 6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kenneth_2003 said:

BMX Bandit said:

That seat would never be a raging leftist. Whoever wins Republican primary is a shoe-in for the general

We need a non-weirdo to run against him in the primary
The primary contender needs to be pretty well funded to get their name out and get people to actually get to the polls and vote in the primary. I'm sure there are plenty of "is the devil we know worse than the devil we don't know" types that might still pull the lever in the primary.

Additionally I think the Navy Seal aspect won a lot of folks his way when he first ran. I don't know how much sway that still holds with many voters, I'm sure quite a bit. Any non-Veteran that challenges him I'm sure he'll rage that it's an assault on veterans.
That's all he ran on the first time. Wounded, decorated war veteran. It's why he wears the stupid eye patch all the time. He doesn't need it. It's a prop to constantly remind everyone he's a wounded veteran.
drumboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marauder Blue 6 said:

Kenneth_2003 said:

BMX Bandit said:

That seat would never be a raging leftist. Whoever wins Republican primary is a shoe-in for the general

We need a non-weirdo to run against him in the primary
The primary contender needs to be pretty well funded to get their name out and get people to actually get to the polls and vote in the primary. I'm sure there are plenty of "is the devil we know worse than the devil we don't know" types that might still pull the lever in the primary.

Additionally I think the Navy Seal aspect won a lot of folks his way when he first ran. I don't know how much sway that still holds with many voters, I'm sure quite a bit. Any non-Veteran that challenges him I'm sure he'll rage that it's an assault on veterans.
That's all he ran on the first time. Wounded, decorated war veteran. It's why he wears the stupid eye patch all the time. He doesn't need it. It's a prop to constantly remind everyone he's a wounded veteran.
[url=https://ts.la/erik936611]https://ts.la/erik936611[/url]
Use my referral link to buy a Tesla and get awards like 3 months of Full Self-Driving Capability.

Schedule a Tesla Demo Drive using my referral link.
Marauder Blue 6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's an idiot.
TexAgs1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

That seat would never be a raging leftist. Whoever wins Republican primary is a shoe-in for the general

We need a non-weirdo to run against him in the primary
My parents live in the district and I've jokingly told my 70 year old father he should become the long-haired conservative populist version of Bernie Sanders and try to primary Patches.
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marauder Blue 6 said:

Kenneth_2003 said:

BMX Bandit said:

That seat would never be a raging leftist. Whoever wins Republican primary is a shoe-in for the general

We need a non-weirdo to run against him in the primary
The primary contender needs to be pretty well funded to get their name out and get people to actually get to the polls and vote in the primary. I'm sure there are plenty of "is the devil we know worse than the devil we don't know" types that might still pull the lever in the primary.

Additionally I think the Navy Seal aspect won a lot of folks his way when he first ran. I don't know how much sway that still holds with many voters, I'm sure quite a bit. Any non-Veteran that challenges him I'm sure he'll rage that it's an assault on veterans.
That's all he ran on the first time. Wounded, decorated war veteran. It's why he wears the stupid eye patch all the time. He doesn't need it. It's a prop to constantly remind everyone he's a wounded veteran.
I live in District 2.
The last 2 elections I've just held my nose and pulled the lever in the General.
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was in district 8 till the idiots in Austin redrew the map. Now I am in district 2 with the idiots that keep reelecting danny boy. Should have moved further north, that was my mistake.

"All the gods, all the heavens, all the hells are within you". Joseph Campbell
O.G.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marauder Blue 6 said:

Kenneth_2003 said:

BMX Bandit said:

That seat would never be a raging leftist. Whoever wins Republican primary is a shoe-in for the general

We need a non-weirdo to run against him in the primary
The primary contender needs to be pretty well funded to get their name out and get people to actually get to the polls and vote in the primary. I'm sure there are plenty of "is the devil we know worse than the devil we don't know" types that might still pull the lever in the primary.

Additionally I think the Navy Seal aspect won a lot of folks his way when he first ran. I don't know how much sway that still holds with many voters, I'm sure quite a bit. Any non-Veteran that challenges him I'm sure he'll rage that it's an assault on veterans.
That's all he ran on the first time. Wounded, decorated war veteran. It's why he wears the stupid eye patch all the time. He doesn't need it. It's a prop to constantly remind everyone he's a wounded veteran.
After he didn't support Eddie Gallagher & then Goggins turned him in to the SEAL community for trash talking Gallagher, he has very few friends left in that world.
BQAg09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Same. I've always voted for someone else in the primary, but I don't dislike him enough to vote for a democrat instead.
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
straight out of an HBO series, sounds like he might be on the payroll of the drug cartels.

The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lara Logan went off the rails long ago.
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
I Am A Critic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Kraken said:

Lara Logan went off the rails long ago.
Enough about her face.
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm no big fan of Crenshaw right now but I won't deny that the man has been the man leading the charge in DC to get US military involved in fighting the cartels. So I highly doubt he was against the designation. Maybe he wanted a different approach, but I don't see how the man would just suddenly do a 180 after basing so much of his political career off this issue.
7nine
schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Or maybe the cartels, while terrible, aren't terrorist organizations?
Marauder Blue 6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmendeler said:

Or maybe the cartels, while terrible, aren't terrorist organizations?
Yeah, but designating them opens up more options to deal with them, legally and kinetically.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmendeler said:

Or maybe the cartels, while terrible, aren't terrorist organizations?

What is your definition of a terrorist organization? It should 100% include the cartels
schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A usually non-governmental organization that tries to effect political objectives through violence, typically against the civilian population, as means to sway governmental policy of that country.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You don't think the cartels commit violence against civilians and elected officials in the USA as a means to do what they want? I mean I guess that is a take.

Also by your definition I guess hamas and al qaedea aren't terrorist organizations because they aren't really trying to influence political policy
schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You're a bad faith debater. Have a nice weekend.
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmendeler said:

A usually non-governmental organization that tries to effect political objectives through violence, typically against the civilian population, as means to sway governmental policy of that country.
You clearly have never followed Mexican politics.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmendeler said:

You're a bad faith debater. Have a nice weekend.

How is that bad faith? I think you gave a good definition. Just not sure how you say Cartels don't qualify.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.