Diggity said:
Gotcha. Hate those kinds of plans.
The gimmicky plans are why I see the deregulation of the retail electric providers as a failure.
- I have to periodically review the fine print of these plans to ensure I'm not getting hoodwinked
- I need to know the usage of my home to pick the most appropriate plan, which I generally don't know until I've lived there for a year
- At best, my savvy will probably earn me the average market price over the long run. At worst, I get stuck with bigger bills for using the exact same quantity of the exact same product as my neighbor.
- And all of this is merely to determine who sends me the bill and collects payment for the electricity generated, distributed, and metered by others.
Sure, it's a minor chore, but it's a pointless minor chore. Introducing competition in the wholesale generation sector makes sense because those power plants then have an incentive to make their operations as efficient as possible. If you don't supply the cheapest electricity, then you don't get dispatched to generate. But I see no efficiencies introduced by deregulating the REPs. In fact, I see inefficiencies, because the firm who actually meters my electricity already bills my natural gas. So my REP is redundant firm adding unnecessary overhead costs.
I just don't see how the REP deregulation has made the supply of electricity more efficient or yielded any productivity benefit to consumers or the Texas economy.