Austin
Sponsored by

Austin City Council passes HOME ordinance

2,313 Views | 11 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Aggietaco
Red Pear Felipe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
Austin passes HOME initiative allowing more housing units on some single-family lots

Quote:

What does the HOME initiative do?
Here are the main changes HOME Phase 1 makes:
  • Allowing up to three dwelling units on a single-family 1, 2 and 3 zones.
  • Creating three-unit residential use and applying it to applicable zones.
  • Easing restrictions on the construction of tiny homes.


Have a good sized lot? Now you can add up to three tiny homes on it! It's no lie to say that Austin really is another extension of California.

https://slate.com/business/2021/09/california-sb9-single-family-zoning-duplexes-newsom-housing.html

Quote:

On Thursday, with the stress of the recall election firmly behind him, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill that effectively abolishes single-family home zoning in the country's largest state. Senate Bill 9 allows owners to split their lots or convert homes to duplexes, regardless of local zoning, in an effort to increase the state's anemic housing production, open up high-opportunity neighborhoods, and lower rents and home prices.

Sponsor Message: We Split Commissions. Full Service Agents in Austin, Bryan-College Station, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio. Red Pear RealtyAustin Monthly
210
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not sure if you are implying you are against this but I'm curious of your thoughts as you're in the industry. Seems like a small step in the right direction to me. Austin's housing and residential zoning laws are a mess.
homebuildingag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds all well and good until you consider the sewer line the new tiny homes are tapping into was only sized for 1 single family residence. The water line was sized for only one single family residence. The trash collection contract was priced for one single family residence. The impervious cover requirements to help prevent excisive rain water runoff was put into place with consideration for one single family residence.

The problem with politicians at every single level is that they have no second or third level consequential thought process.
maverick2076
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, and every jackwagon with aspirations of real estate riches throwing a pair of Home Depot or Amazon sheds in their yard and calling them tiny homes is really going to fix Austin's housing woes.
512Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Developer wants to cover a small lot with 3 units? Cool.

Homeowner wants to build a pool with a deck that covers much of the lot they own? Sorry, that violates impervious cover rules. Not allowed.

I don't normally complain about a lot of what goes on in Austin, but the city can F right off with this.
Martin Cash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So every lot will have six cars parked in the street in front.

The level of stupidity of the Austin city council continues to grow by leaps and bounds.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Increasing density without redeveloping the utility infrastructure for the demand will be a mess. Water, storm water, sewer, power, gas, communications. Be assured, the city is assuming they will be able to regulate most of the additional population density into using public transportation or bikes, instead of needing additional parking.
evan_aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Martin Cash said:

So every lot will have six cars parked in the street in front.

The level of stupidity of the Austin city council continues to grow by leaps and bounds.


No they won't. Remember our extremely expansive and efficient ProjectConnect that costs us another $0.12 cents per $100 valuation, or $500/house?

Or the 200 electric buses that we signed off on which don't work and the company went bankrupt
Red Pear Felipe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
I honestly don't think that this will help with housing affordability at all, but to each their own. There are some very good questions on this thread as to how it's going to affect sewer and trash services. As for parking, I believe the city doesn't even require parking spaces in some areas. I guess we'll have to see what happens now with this new ordinance.
Sponsor Message: We Split Commissions. Full Service Agents in Austin, Bryan-College Station, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio. Red Pear RealtyAustin Monthly
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Martin Cash said:

So every lot will have six cars parked in the street in front.

The level of stupidity of the Austin city council continues to grow by leaps and bounds.
it is a direct reflection of the folks that vote them in.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IF your lot has sufficient SF to accommodate the added impervious cover then and only then can you add those dwelling units up to 3. There are floor to area ratios that remain in place, as well as fire separation IRC code requriements.

IF your total plumbing fixture count requires a larger line from the meter normal 3/4" to say 1-1/2" to accommodate the added number of plumbing fixtures, then that cost will have to be factored into the final cost of construction.

IF your existing electrical panel needs to be upgraded to accommodate the added load, say from 100A to 200A, then that expense will have to factored in to the final cost of construction.

Every lot will still have to adhere to the impervious cover limits, tree ordinance, and all other land development ordinances.

As for parking, that is where the elimination of required parking spaces is going to make things interesting. Because I don't think everyone is ready to give up their automobiles. This effort will surely put that idea on the fast track. Add to that all the forecasts that the current generation is not buying cars as past generations. Lyft and other ride share applications are not getting smaller. So they may be factoring that into the overall planning.

The other question revolves around affordability. If more units are being provided, it would seem to follow that more supply means lower price. We shall see.

ETA: If you have been following any of the Code Next or the current efforts to revise the Austin Land Development Code, then this is just one step of others. However, it is par for the course and more of a notice that Austin is no longer a small city- it is well on its way to a large city.
Aggietaco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How dare you bring reason into this thread! What about the trash service???
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.