Throwout said:
just ask them to name one thing that's better here since he was hired 5 years ago.
Right! And council scaled back the scope of the audit because they do not want citizens to see how much money AE contributes to the budget and how much lower energy rates could be. Austin Council plays the citizens of Austin like a violin.Rongagin71 said:
If what I hear is right, the City was behind by as much as 4 years on tree trimming.
Possibly the city taking $118million every year from Austin Energy might have something to do with that, or maybe they are just slow. BTW, don't even dream that there will be an audit to discover where that money went.
emando2000 said:
I read an article that says Cronk to receive $463,000 in severance. Most jobs receive what, 36-month severance? That amount seems more like multiple years of severance.
Yes, I'll edit. Typo.evan_aggie said:emando2000 said:
I read an article that says Cronk to receive $463,000 in severance. Most jobs receive what, 36-month severance? That amount seems more like multiple years of severance.
I assume you meant 3-6 months severance?
MouthBQ98 said:
May have been ineffective but used as the fall guy by other city policy makers for their inept use of funds that should have been used for mitigation for storm effects instead of being diverted to feel good vote buying projects.
