Pebble Creek Parkway, Urban Planning & Traffic

7,248 Views | 69 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by Aggieland Proud
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've edited this opening comment after The Eagle story on April 11, 2026

*******

As College Station continues to grow, more debates will occur like the Pebble Creek Parkway extension.

This was about how a city should grow, and whether or not its major roadways should bisect established neighborhoods.

My reasons in favor of removing the extension were:

Landscape maintenance vehicles and golf carts, at hundreds of crossings per day, are not compatible with a major roadway. We never adequately addressed that aspect of public safety. How were we going to deal with that inconvenient truth?

From a fire and EMS perspective, the travel time to reach the new neighborhood through Pebble would've been longer than both NFPA and CSFD standards. Fire station #5 protects College Station's largest geographical district, and is under response time pressure already.

And, we haven't addressed Fire Station 8, which will have to go somewhere on the southeast side- even though we are well inside the 20 year planning horizon the Comprehensive Plan demands. (We actually had a planned station to serve this precise area, and gave it up in 2021.)

Just from a traffic flow perspective, the MPO and the city have Lakeway incorrectly classified:

Lakeway should be an arterial, because its wider and will carry more traffic, because it connects neighborhoods without bisecting them, and because it offers ready access to two business parks, a Costco and Lowe's, a huge church, TEEX and much more to come.

In what world of traffic planning was Pebble Creek Parkway a larger classified roadway than Midtown/Lakeway? Than Longmire, even? That makes no sense to me.

With proper classification for the roads in this area, the north/south transit problem is solved by the standards we adhere to.

Our city is full of very smart people. They did their research. They cited our own engineering study which said removing the Pebble extension had no material impact on surrounding roadways, even after future growth.

Each case is unique. Appomattox is not Pebble Creek Parkway or Munson or Victoria. We'll have many more of these. We just need to do the research to get it right.

I'll answer any questions on the technical merits, as I see it, if you wish. I believe we got it right last night.

Respectfully

Yancy '95 Place 5
tu ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where is the next major road (or roads), on the very South end of CS, going to go? Lots of rooftops going up and the infrastructure is already behind.
5thSergeantPumpkin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
While I believe the fire station response time arguments were almost bordering on false dichotomy territory (every minute counts, it's not a pass/fail scenario when lives are at stake), I do also agree that "Station 8" seems inevitable, between midtown's growth pulling on Station 5, The upcoming Savannah Oaks, and eventual annexation of Southern Pointe.

Especially Savannah Oaks and Southern Pointe will introduce over 3,000 new homes south of Pebble Creek. I remember when tower point was just a water tower- now it'll feel like the middle of town. I wonder what else we should be doing to plan for this growth and make sure we can maintain those neighborhood's integrities as well.

Edit: To clarify, I'm not trying to criticize or bring up now completed discussions, just expressing observations of growth and curious to see thoughts on what to prioritize

D_Wag97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tu ag said:

Where is the next major road (or roads), on the very South end of CS, going to go? Lots of rooftops going up and the infrastructure is already behind.

The whole city is like this- like all the planners never envisioned CS growing past Harvey. There's no continuity in any north-south roads due to neighborhoods that were built without foresight, and it's happening again. Same thing for east-west. Greens Prairie is already at capacity with more houses coming.
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tu ag said:

Where is the next major road (or roads), on the very South end of CS, going to go? Lots of rooftops going up and the infrastructure is already behind.


With Lakeway Drive up-classified to Minor Arterial, the south College Station thoroughfare network east of SH 6 satisfies AASHTO spacing standards. It's not perfect due to Lakeway's proximity to Highway 6, but it works.

SH 6 is a Freeway. Lakeway becomes a Minor Arterial serving the commercial corridor, and connects neighborhoods and commercial without penetrating the center of a housing development.

Rock Prairie is slated to be a 4-Lane Major Arterial serving regional east-west (generally) movement. Pebble Creek Parkway drops correctly to Major Collector serving internal subdivision circulation.

AASHTO spacing requirements apply between roads of the same classification. Lakeway as Minor Arterial and Rock Prairie as Major Arterial are doing different jobs at different scales, along with the highway they complement rather than compete.

Every road is then classified at the level that matches its actual function, its actual volumes per Kimley-Horn's data. No Minor Arterial penetrates an identifiable neighborhood. No road carrying Major Collector volumes is classified as a Minor Arterial. No road carrying (or soon will carry) arterial is classified as a collector.

It corrects the inversion that happened in 2017.

Respectfully

Yancy '95 Place 5
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D_Wag97 said:

tu ag said:

Where is the next major road (or roads), on the very South end of CS, going to go? Lots of rooftops going up and the infrastructure is already behind.

The whole city is like this- like all the planners never envisioned CS growing past Harvey. There's no continuity in any north-south roads due to neighborhoods that were built without foresight, and it's happening again. Same thing for east-west. Greens Prairie is already at capacity with more houses coming.


Actually, the southeast quadrant is pretty well off for north south transit after what we did last night- or what last night will likely precipitate. What it's missing is a few collectors along Fitch- which'll likely never happen now.

But then no area is perfect. I'll grant you that.

Respectfully

Yancy '95
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
5thSergeantPumpkin said:

While I believe the fire station response time arguments were almost bordering on false dichotomy territory (every minute counts, it's not a pass/fail scenario when lives are at stake), I do also agree that "Station 8" seems inevitable, between midtown's growth pulling on Station 5, The upcoming Savannah Oaks, and eventual annexation of Southern Pointe.

Especially Savannah Oaks and Southern Pointe will introduce over 3,000 new homes south of Pebble Creek. I remember when tower point was just a water tower- now it'll feel like the middle of town. I wonder what else we should be doing to plan for this growth and make sure we can maintain those neighborhood's integrities as well.

Edit: To clarify, I'm not trying to criticize or bring up now completed discussions, just expressing observations of growth and curious to see thoughts on what to prioritize




That was one of my major issues with last night. Station 8 is absolutely inevitable. No two ways about it. A small city's worth of homes and commercial is about to SimCity itself in that quadrant.

We had an optimum spot all picked out and we let it go in 2021 at 2021 prices. The good news is it'll be mid-2030s before it's a necessity, but it will be.

Our comp plan states it's a 20 year look ahead plan. We are definitely inside that window. I know Chief Mann is thinking on it. He loves data.

Time to roll up our sleeves and get to work.

Respectfully

Yancy '95 Place 5
NotJPMorgan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The updated classification seems appropriate to me, however the removal of the plan for extension/connection will inevitably result in the issues currently seen all over College Station: roads that should continue abruptly ending with hundreds or thousands of residences beyond their boundary.

Welsh, Anderson, and Dexter are perfect examples of unplanned growth and neighborhood opposition that have crippled traffic in our city for years.

20 years from now, residents of Southeast College Station will be complaining about why they can't get across this part of town without using Hwy 6 or Lakeway (which will be a glorified feeder road) and we'll have decisions like this to look back on and NIMBYs to thank.
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NotJPMorgan said:

The updated classification seems appropriate to me, however the removal of the plan for extension/connection will inevitably result in the issues currently seen all over College Station: roads that should continue abruptly ending with hundreds or thousands of residences beyond their boundary.

Welsh, Anderson, and Dexter are perfect examples of unplanned growth and neighborhood opposition that have crippled traffic in our city for years.

20 years from now, residents of Southeast College Station will be complaining about why they can't get across this part of town without using Hwy 6 or Lakeway (which will be a glorified feeder road) and we'll have decisions like this to look back on and NIMBYs to thank.


You left Rock Prairie as major arterial out of your calculus, JP.

Respectfully

Yancy '95
Average Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thank you for not allowing more mistakes to try and cover up past mistakes. Let's hope we can continue to wisen up and start making smart moves going forward.
NotJPMorgan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I considered it in my calculations, but I don't think it solves the issue at hand. If a connection to the Southern Pointe community from Pebble Creek is off the table, then an additional east/west link between RP and Hwy 6/lakeway needs to be added. If RP is the solution, 1 4 lane minor arterial from Southern Pointe will be a bottleneck in years to come.

I think the current plan is in good shape overall, but I am very disappointed in the decision to remove the connection of Pebble Creek/Pipeline. While this road should not be designed to accommodate all/most traffic, it is a disservice to those in both neighborhoods (even if PC won't realize it for years) that no connection will exist.
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NotJPMorgan said:

I considered it in my calculations, but I don't think it solves the issue at hand. If a connection to the Southern Pointe community from Pebble Creek is off the table, then an additional east/west link between RP and Hwy 6/lakeway needs to be added. If RP is the solution, 1 4 lane minor arterial from Southern Pointe will be a bottleneck in years to come.

I think the current plan is in good shape overall, but I am very disappointed in the decision to remove the connection of Pebble Creek/Pipeline. While this road should not be designed to accommodate all/most traffic, it is a disservice to those in both neighborhoods (even if PC won't realize it for years) that no connection will exist.


I respectfully disagree and if I didn't, I would've voted differently.

Folks in Savannah will have east/west connectivity to Lakeway and the highway to the west, and Rock Prairie (4 lanes) to the east.

Folks in the development at the current terminus of Lakeway in the CS business park, will have almost immediate access to the future Lakeway and the highway.

Honestly I'm not sure what purpose the Pebble extension was going to serve, except a bunch of construction trucks coming from Fitch on their way to build out these subdivisions. And to me, that wasn't worth it in the end. To me. As one member of council.

Respectfully

Yancy '95
NotJPMorgan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I appreciate your perspective, and I will agree about the use in current circumstances. While I'm disappointed the connection is no longer an option, I never envisioned it happening until development was completed. Sort of a "last phase" if you will.
AggiePhil
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bob Yancy said:

We had an optimum spot all picked out and we let it go in 2021 at 2021 prices.

Where was that?
MiMi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Where will Savannah Oaks be located?
5thSergeantPumpkin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty much filling up the space enclosed by Pebble Creek, Highway 6, Southern Pointe, and Lick Creek Park
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggiePhil said:

Bob Yancy said:

We had an optimum spot all picked out and we let it go in 2021 at 2021 prices.

Where was that?


Southern Point- development agreement in 2017. We decided not to acquire it in 2021.

Respectfully

Yancy '95 Place 5
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bob the take home lesson, for me, is that the council rejected the advise of their own fire department. We the citizens of CoCS entrust our safety on our firefighters and yet we reject their advise.
ElephantRider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tu ag said:

Where is the next major road (or roads), on the very South end of CS, going to go? Lots of rooftops going up and the infrastructure is already behind.

Who cares, as long as the rich folk are happy
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
doubledog said:

Bob the take home lesson, for me, is that the council rejected the advise of their own fire department. We the citizens of CoCS entrust our safety on our firefighters and yet we reject their advise.


I don't know what the calculus was back then. I think they thought, due to the change in annexation laws, that maybe annexation would never happen again? But that discounts voluntary annexation, which happens all the time. I don't know- part of my research was going back to that meeting video and watching it, but it was passed on the consent agenda with no discussion- which took me aback I'll admit. Perhaps I missed it though and they discussed on a workshop, which I think were separate meetings back then? I don't know, sorry. The research stack on this pebble extension would blow your mind. I'm going to need another filing cabinet. :-)

Respectfully

Yancy '95
oklaunion
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The dude who posted above me is what a true representative should be like.
Thanks Bob. And I don't even live in the city limits but would have had to pay an entry toll in order to pay for the streets if Lord Crompton had his way.
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oklaunion said:

The dude who posted above me is what a true representative should be like.
Thanks Bob. And I don't even live in the city limits but would have had to pay an entry toll in order to pay for the streets if Lord Crompton had his way.


You guys trap me when you compliment me but remark negatively about folks personally. I started this thread to divert Pebble discussion on a new one, on the technical merits, and to get away from the other one that started to lay into staff.

I like John Crompton. He's a nice man. A city park is named after him. He's a veritable fount of knowledge on parks and more. We disagree on a lot- a whole lot- but we do so civilly and as gentlemen.

That's where I want to take discourse about city events and park it there. Our nation suffers from the lost art of civil debate and the contest of ideas. It's at the edge of that art that better policy gets crafted, and nowhere else.

I'm sorry to lecture but that's what I believe and respectfully ask yall to consider on threads I'm engaging on.

Respectfully

Yancy '95
Goat Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bob Yancy said:

oklaunion said:

The dude who posted above me is what a true representative should be like.
Thanks Bob. And I don't even live in the city limits but would have had to pay an entry toll in order to pay for the streets if Lord Crompton had his way.


You guys trap me when you compliment me but remark negatively about folks personally. I started this thread to divert Pebble discussion on a new one, on the technical merits, and to get away from the other one that started to lay into staff.

I like John Crompton. He's a nice man. A city park is named after him. He's a veritable fount of knowledge on parks and more. We disagree on a lot- a whole lot- but we do so civilly and as gentlemen.

That's where I want to take discourse about city events and park it there. Our nation suffers from the lost art of civil debate and the contest of ideas. It's at the edge of that art that better policy gets crafted, and nowhere else.

I'm sorry to lecture but that's what I believe and respectfully ask yall to consider on threads I'm engaging on.

Respectfully

Yancy '95
This was very well said Mr. Yancy. I concur and hope we can move back towards a more civil society. There is a lot of work to do by all of us to get there.
jja79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tu ag said:

Where is the next major road (or roads), on the very South end of CS, going to go? Lots of rooftops going up and the infrastructure is already behind.


This is the same in every growing area in the United States.
PS3D
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wrote something in regards to this in October but I didn't get any replies so I'll rework it:

When it comes to city growth and housing, we can argue all day about density and "stealth dorms" but when it comes to actually expanding and building roads to make the city work, people absolutely lose it.

Bryan-College Station expands north to south rather than east to west, much like Austin, and also much like Austin the road network stinks. There's only a few major roads that go north-south (like Texas Avenue) but the rest of the city is composed of mostly-useless two lane roads (with bike lanes and turning lanes) that go nowhere, and every time a road expansion comes up, either someone complains or drops the ball. The South Holleman/Rock Prairie stoplight was designed to have two lanes in each direction from Rock Prairie Road West, but then the city cheaped out on it, didn't widen it to four lanes (also creating a potentially dangerous situation where cars merge just after the General Parkway turnoff), and a mess of multiple missed opportunities I'm not particularly optimistic, made even worse by the fact that there are now multiple patches of concrete where they had to dig things out again and do utility work all across the expansion.

Put simply, we need to have a grid of 4+ lane roads going north/south and east/west that completely connect to as many areas as possible. Every time we have an opportunity to make a major road project, someone always, always complains, and then the city backs down every time, or just sleeps on what would be a good opportunity. For example, at various points, Dexter Drive was to be widened to four lanes or Munson to six, but even when a window of opportunity comes open the City doesn't grasp it. For instance, a plan decades ago to connect Houston Street to Welsh was killed, and instead of the two lanes + turn lane + bike path all the way to campus (which would be a great relief point for Wellborn and Texas Avenue) Welsh Avenue peters out two blocks away from George Bush Drive.

However, about 10-15 years ago most of the rental homes on Welsh north of Holleman were being torn down and rebuilt, the City of College Station missed a golden opportunity to go ahead and widen Welsh all the way to campus and provide a relief outlet for Wellborn and Texas Avenue...or when Rock Prairie Elementary School was up for renovation there should have at least been an alternative to completely rebuild the school to allow for a re-routing of Welsh Avenue and eliminating the stoplight while completely re-imagining the ingress/egress of the school.

There needs to be a complete four-lane avenue on the east side of the city--Highway 6 grinds to a halt during rush hour because it is forced to do double-duty as a local avenue and an inter-city highway. There's just no other alternatives, not even Dartmouth, which lost its extra lanes around 2015-2016 (and a planned connection to Brothers still waits).

The biggest impediment to traffic flow is going to be Texas A&M University, roads have to go around it, instead of through it (with the exception of Wellborn Road). I know there's talk of sinking University Drive to connect better with Northgate, but I also think that there needs to be a north-south connection as well. Imagine, if you will, instead of College Avenue going into campus, entering a tunnel that goes underneath Main Campus and emerging as a connection to Anderson. It wouldn't be a panacea for traffic but it could take load off of Texas Avenue and Wellborn.

The other thing that College Station needs to do is work with Bryan. Years ago, I was frustrated how College Main was turned into a nice little street on the Bryan side, adding bike lanes, sidewalks, and so forth, while the College Station side abruptly dead-ended in an alley. Meanwhile, Bryan has its own issues, ruining Finfeather and WJB, among others.

There NEEDS to be a north-south road east of the highway that actually goes somewhere, but as we can see with the Pebble Creek crowd and the East Loop crowd I don't see that happening. A few people with a lot of money can make a big difference.
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PS3D said:

I wrote something in regards to this in October but I didn't get any replies so I'll rework it:

When it comes to city growth and housing, we can argue all day about density and "stealth dorms" but when it comes to actually expanding and building roads to make the city work, people absolutely lose it.

Bryan-College Station expands north to south rather than east to west, much like Austin, and also much like Austin the road network stinks. There's only a few major roads that go north-south (like Texas Avenue) but the rest of the city is composed of mostly-useless two lane roads (with bike lanes and turning lanes) that go nowhere, and every time a road expansion comes up, either someone complains or drops the ball. The South Holleman/Rock Prairie stoplight was designed to have two lanes in each direction from Rock Prairie Road West, but then the city cheaped out on it, didn't widen it to four lanes (also creating a potentially dangerous situation where cars merge just after the General Parkway turnoff), and a mess of multiple missed opportunities I'm not particularly optimistic, made even worse by the fact that there are now multiple patches of concrete where they had to dig things out again and do utility work all across the expansion.

Put simply, we need to have a grid of 4+ lane roads going north/south and east/west that completely connect to as many areas as possible. Every time we have an opportunity to make a major road project, someone always, always complains, and then the city backs down every time, or just sleeps on what would be a good opportunity. For example, at various points, Dexter Drive was to be widened to four lanes or Munson to six, but even when a window of opportunity comes open the City doesn't grasp it. For instance, a plan decades ago to connect Houston Street to Welsh was killed, and instead of the two lanes + turn lane + bike path all the way to campus (which would be a great relief point for Wellborn and Texas Avenue) Welsh Avenue peters out two blocks away from George Bush Drive.

However, about 10-15 years ago most of the rental homes on Welsh north of Holleman were being torn down and rebuilt, the City of College Station missed a golden opportunity to go ahead and widen Welsh all the way to campus and provide a relief outlet for Wellborn and Texas Avenue...or when Rock Prairie Elementary School was up for renovation there should have at least been an alternative to completely rebuild the school to allow for a re-routing of Welsh Avenue and eliminating the stoplight while completely re-imagining the ingress/egress of the school.

There needs to be a complete four-lane avenue on the east side of the city--Highway 6 grinds to a halt during rush hour because it is forced to do double-duty as a local avenue and an inter-city highway. There's just no other alternatives, not even Dartmouth, which lost its extra lanes around 2015-2016 (and a planned connection to Brothers still waits).

The biggest impediment to traffic flow is going to be Texas A&M University, roads have to go around it, instead of through it (with the exception of Wellborn Road). I know there's talk of sinking University Drive to connect better with Northgate, but I also think that there needs to be a north-south connection as well. Imagine, if you will, instead of College Avenue going into campus, entering a tunnel that goes underneath Main Campus and emerging as a connection to Anderson. It wouldn't be a panacea for traffic but it could take load off of Texas Avenue and Wellborn.

The other thing that College Station needs to do is work with Bryan. Years ago, I was frustrated how College Main was turned into a nice little street on the Bryan side, adding bike lanes, sidewalks, and so forth, while the College Station side abruptly dead-ended in an alley. Meanwhile, Bryan has its own issues, ruining Finfeather and WJB, among others.

There NEEDS to be a north-south road east of the highway that actually goes somewhere, but as we can see with the Pebble Creek crowd and the East Loop crowd I don't see that happening. A few people with a lot of money can make a big difference.



I agree with a good portion of what you've written. What I like about your approach is you're obviously not a "process person." You get into the weeds on details that matter, and apparently would be willing to make adjustments on the fly.

Unfortunately, we have a ton of "processes" and it's hard to do that.

I disagree with you on Pebble though. We have Rock Prairie as a 4 lane arterial running generally north south, we have Pebble as a neighborhood collector, we have Lakeway (if we upclassify it as we should) making Midtown/Lakeway north / south as an arterial, and we have the freeway and its frontage roads.

With those changes, the southeast quadrant of College Station complies with AASHTO standards and we have good north / south flow.

My $.02

Respectfully

Yancy '95
PS3D
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bob Yancy said:

PS3D said:

I wrote something in regards to this in October but I didn't get any replies so I'll rework it:

When it comes to city growth and housing, we can argue all day about density and "stealth dorms" but when it comes to actually expanding and building roads to make the city work, people absolutely lose it.

Bryan-College Station expands north to south rather than east to west, much like Austin, and also much like Austin the road network stinks. There's only a few major roads that go north-south (like Texas Avenue) but the rest of the city is composed of mostly-useless two lane roads (with bike lanes and turning lanes) that go nowhere, and every time a road expansion comes up, either someone complains or drops the ball. The South Holleman/Rock Prairie stoplight was designed to have two lanes in each direction from Rock Prairie Road West, but then the city cheaped out on it, didn't widen it to four lanes (also creating a potentially dangerous situation where cars merge just after the General Parkway turnoff), and a mess of multiple missed opportunities I'm not particularly optimistic, made even worse by the fact that there are now multiple patches of concrete where they had to dig things out again and do utility work all across the expansion.

Put simply, we need to have a grid of 4+ lane roads going north/south and east/west that completely connect to as many areas as possible. Every time we have an opportunity to make a major road project, someone always, always complains, and then the city backs down every time, or just sleeps on what would be a good opportunity. For example, at various points, Dexter Drive was to be widened to four lanes or Munson to six, but even when a window of opportunity comes open the City doesn't grasp it. For instance, a plan decades ago to connect Houston Street to Welsh was killed, and instead of the two lanes + turn lane + bike path all the way to campus (which would be a great relief point for Wellborn and Texas Avenue) Welsh Avenue peters out two blocks away from George Bush Drive.

However, about 10-15 years ago most of the rental homes on Welsh north of Holleman were being torn down and rebuilt, the City of College Station missed a golden opportunity to go ahead and widen Welsh all the way to campus and provide a relief outlet for Wellborn and Texas Avenue...or when Rock Prairie Elementary School was up for renovation there should have at least been an alternative to completely rebuild the school to allow for a re-routing of Welsh Avenue and eliminating the stoplight while completely re-imagining the ingress/egress of the school.

There needs to be a complete four-lane avenue on the east side of the city--Highway 6 grinds to a halt during rush hour because it is forced to do double-duty as a local avenue and an inter-city highway. There's just no other alternatives, not even Dartmouth, which lost its extra lanes around 2015-2016 (and a planned connection to Brothers still waits).

The biggest impediment to traffic flow is going to be Texas A&M University, roads have to go around it, instead of through it (with the exception of Wellborn Road). I know there's talk of sinking University Drive to connect better with Northgate, but I also think that there needs to be a north-south connection as well. Imagine, if you will, instead of College Avenue going into campus, entering a tunnel that goes underneath Main Campus and emerging as a connection to Anderson. It wouldn't be a panacea for traffic but it could take load off of Texas Avenue and Wellborn.

The other thing that College Station needs to do is work with Bryan. Years ago, I was frustrated how College Main was turned into a nice little street on the Bryan side, adding bike lanes, sidewalks, and so forth, while the College Station side abruptly dead-ended in an alley. Meanwhile, Bryan has its own issues, ruining Finfeather and WJB, among others.

There NEEDS to be a north-south road east of the highway that actually goes somewhere, but as we can see with the Pebble Creek crowd and the East Loop crowd I don't see that happening. A few people with a lot of money can make a big difference.



I agree with a good portion of what you've written. What I like about your approach is you're obviously not a "process person." You get into the weeds on details that matter, and apparently would be willing to make adjustments on the fly.

Unfortunately, we have a ton of "processes" and it's hard to do that.

I disagree with you on Pebble though. We have Rock Prairie as a 4 lane arterial running generally north south, we have Pebble as a neighborhood collector, we have Lakeway (if we upclassify it as we should) making Midtown/Lakeway north / south as an arterial, and we have the freeway and its frontage roads.

With those changes, the southeast quadrant of College Station complies with AASHTO standards and we have good north / south flow.

My $.02

Respectfully

Yancy '95

I don't like how Rock Prairie bends southward, it looks like the original idea for Rock Prairie was mostly a north-south road but decades ago the city decided to envision Rock Prairie Road as east-west, originally running from Highway 6 to Victoria (it didn't even reach FM 2154 for another decade after construction).

Could the power line right of way be widened used to create a roadway? Like if Rock Prairie Road (east of the highway) was re-aligned to follow it, it could take a lot of local traffic off Highway 6, connecting to University Drive East as well as Raintree, Windwood, Horse Haven, and Foxfire, without cutting through those neighborhoods directly. Maybe Raintree would be most affected but it wouldn't have to rip through neighborhoods. Emerald Parkway maybe, but the road wouldn't be physically affected.
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PS3D said:

Bob Yancy said:

PS3D said:

I wrote something in regards to this in October but I didn't get any replies so I'll rework it:

When it comes to city growth and housing, we can argue all day about density and "stealth dorms" but when it comes to actually expanding and building roads to make the city work, people absolutely lose it.

Bryan-College Station expands north to south rather than east to west, much like Austin, and also much like Austin the road network stinks. There's only a few major roads that go north-south (like Texas Avenue) but the rest of the city is composed of mostly-useless two lane roads (with bike lanes and turning lanes) that go nowhere, and every time a road expansion comes up, either someone complains or drops the ball. The South Holleman/Rock Prairie stoplight was designed to have two lanes in each direction from Rock Prairie Road West, but then the city cheaped out on it, didn't widen it to four lanes (also creating a potentially dangerous situation where cars merge just after the General Parkway turnoff), and a mess of multiple missed opportunities I'm not particularly optimistic, made even worse by the fact that there are now multiple patches of concrete where they had to dig things out again and do utility work all across the expansion.

Put simply, we need to have a grid of 4+ lane roads going north/south and east/west that completely connect to as many areas as possible. Every time we have an opportunity to make a major road project, someone always, always complains, and then the city backs down every time, or just sleeps on what would be a good opportunity. For example, at various points, Dexter Drive was to be widened to four lanes or Munson to six, but even when a window of opportunity comes open the City doesn't grasp it. For instance, a plan decades ago to connect Houston Street to Welsh was killed, and instead of the two lanes + turn lane + bike path all the way to campus (which would be a great relief point for Wellborn and Texas Avenue) Welsh Avenue peters out two blocks away from George Bush Drive.

However, about 10-15 years ago most of the rental homes on Welsh north of Holleman were being torn down and rebuilt, the City of College Station missed a golden opportunity to go ahead and widen Welsh all the way to campus and provide a relief outlet for Wellborn and Texas Avenue...or when Rock Prairie Elementary School was up for renovation there should have at least been an alternative to completely rebuild the school to allow for a re-routing of Welsh Avenue and eliminating the stoplight while completely re-imagining the ingress/egress of the school.

There needs to be a complete four-lane avenue on the east side of the city--Highway 6 grinds to a halt during rush hour because it is forced to do double-duty as a local avenue and an inter-city highway. There's just no other alternatives, not even Dartmouth, which lost its extra lanes around 2015-2016 (and a planned connection to Brothers still waits).

The biggest impediment to traffic flow is going to be Texas A&M University, roads have to go around it, instead of through it (with the exception of Wellborn Road). I know there's talk of sinking University Drive to connect better with Northgate, but I also think that there needs to be a north-south connection as well. Imagine, if you will, instead of College Avenue going into campus, entering a tunnel that goes underneath Main Campus and emerging as a connection to Anderson. It wouldn't be a panacea for traffic but it could take load off of Texas Avenue and Wellborn.

The other thing that College Station needs to do is work with Bryan. Years ago, I was frustrated how College Main was turned into a nice little street on the Bryan side, adding bike lanes, sidewalks, and so forth, while the College Station side abruptly dead-ended in an alley. Meanwhile, Bryan has its own issues, ruining Finfeather and WJB, among others.

There NEEDS to be a north-south road east of the highway that actually goes somewhere, but as we can see with the Pebble Creek crowd and the East Loop crowd I don't see that happening. A few people with a lot of money can make a big difference.



I agree with a good portion of what you've written. What I like about your approach is you're obviously not a "process person." You get into the weeds on details that matter, and apparently would be willing to make adjustments on the fly.

Unfortunately, we have a ton of "processes" and it's hard to do that.

I disagree with you on Pebble though. We have Rock Prairie as a 4 lane arterial running generally north south, we have Pebble as a neighborhood collector, we have Lakeway (if we upclassify it as we should) making Midtown/Lakeway north / south as an arterial, and we have the freeway and its frontage roads.

With those changes, the southeast quadrant of College Station complies with AASHTO standards and we have good north / south flow.

My $.02

Respectfully

Yancy '95

I don't like how Rock Prairie bends southward, it looks like the original idea for Rock Prairie was mostly a north-south road but decades ago the city decided to envision Rock Prairie Road as east-west, originally running from Highway 6 to Victoria (it didn't even reach FM 2154 for another decade after construction).

Could the power line right of way be widened used to create a roadway? Like if Rock Prairie Road (east of the highway) was re-aligned to follow it, it could take a lot of local traffic off Highway 6, connecting to University Drive East as well as Raintree, Windwood, Horse Haven, and Foxfire, without cutting through those neighborhoods directly. Maybe Raintree would be most affected but it wouldn't have to rip through neighborhoods. Emerald Parkway maybe, but the road wouldn't be physically affected.


I'll look this evening. Midtown/Lakeway needs to be one name and should've been designed to extend further, creating a nice elongated commercial corridor between it and the highway.

"Backage" roads like that do extremely well in traffic flow, commercial development, and separating neighborhoods from commercial.

They create a second "front door" for commerocal, give businesses rear access, delivery separation, and cross-access between adjacent lots without customers having to re-enter the arterial. It drives higher land utilization and often higher values.

And routing cut-through traffic onto the backage road makes residential streets stay residential. Buffers commercial and through-traffic friction so neighborhoods don't have to.

Midtown/Lakeway is a crucial road. That's going to be a neat area.

Respectfully

Yancy '95
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bob Yancy said:

PS3D said:

Bob Yancy said:

PS3D said:

I wrote something in regards to this in October but I didn't get any replies so I'll rework it:

When it comes to city growth and housing, we can argue all day about density and "stealth dorms" but when it comes to actually expanding and building roads to make the city work, people absolutely lose it.

Bryan-College Station expands north to south rather than east to west, much like Austin, and also much like Austin the road network stinks. There's only a few major roads that go north-south (like Texas Avenue) but the rest of the city is composed of mostly-useless two lane roads (with bike lanes and turning lanes) that go nowhere, and every time a road expansion comes up, either someone complains or drops the ball. The South Holleman/Rock Prairie stoplight was designed to have two lanes in each direction from Rock Prairie Road West, but then the city cheaped out on it, didn't widen it to four lanes (also creating a potentially dangerous situation where cars merge just after the General Parkway turnoff), and a mess of multiple missed opportunities I'm not particularly optimistic, made even worse by the fact that there are now multiple patches of concrete where they had to dig things out again and do utility work all across the expansion.

Put simply, we need to have a grid of 4+ lane roads going north/south and east/west that completely connect to as many areas as possible. Every time we have an opportunity to make a major road project, someone always, always complains, and then the city backs down every time, or just sleeps on what would be a good opportunity. For example, at various points, Dexter Drive was to be widened to four lanes or Munson to six, but even when a window of opportunity comes open the City doesn't grasp it. For instance, a plan decades ago to connect Houston Street to Welsh was killed, and instead of the two lanes + turn lane + bike path all the way to campus (which would be a great relief point for Wellborn and Texas Avenue) Welsh Avenue peters out two blocks away from George Bush Drive.

However, about 10-15 years ago most of the rental homes on Welsh north of Holleman were being torn down and rebuilt, the City of College Station missed a golden opportunity to go ahead and widen Welsh all the way to campus and provide a relief outlet for Wellborn and Texas Avenue...or when Rock Prairie Elementary School was up for renovation there should have at least been an alternative to completely rebuild the school to allow for a re-routing of Welsh Avenue and eliminating the stoplight while completely re-imagining the ingress/egress of the school.

There needs to be a complete four-lane avenue on the east side of the city--Highway 6 grinds to a halt during rush hour because it is forced to do double-duty as a local avenue and an inter-city highway. There's just no other alternatives, not even Dartmouth, which lost its extra lanes around 2015-2016 (and a planned connection to Brothers still waits).

The biggest impediment to traffic flow is going to be Texas A&M University, roads have to go around it, instead of through it (with the exception of Wellborn Road). I know there's talk of sinking University Drive to connect better with Northgate, but I also think that there needs to be a north-south connection as well. Imagine, if you will, instead of College Avenue going into campus, entering a tunnel that goes underneath Main Campus and emerging as a connection to Anderson. It wouldn't be a panacea for traffic but it could take load off of Texas Avenue and Wellborn.

The other thing that College Station needs to do is work with Bryan. Years ago, I was frustrated how College Main was turned into a nice little street on the Bryan side, adding bike lanes, sidewalks, and so forth, while the College Station side abruptly dead-ended in an alley. Meanwhile, Bryan has its own issues, ruining Finfeather and WJB, among others.

There NEEDS to be a north-south road east of the highway that actually goes somewhere, but as we can see with the Pebble Creek crowd and the East Loop crowd I don't see that happening. A few people with a lot of money can make a big difference.



I agree with a good portion of what you've written. What I like about your approach is you're obviously not a "process person." You get into the weeds on details that matter, and apparently would be willing to make adjustments on the fly.

Unfortunately, we have a ton of "processes" and it's hard to do that.

I disagree with you on Pebble though. We have Rock Prairie as a 4 lane arterial running generally north south, we have Pebble as a neighborhood collector, we have Lakeway (if we upclassify it as we should) making Midtown/Lakeway north / south as an arterial, and we have the freeway and its frontage roads.

With those changes, the southeast quadrant of College Station complies with AASHTO standards and we have good north / south flow.

My $.02

Respectfully

Yancy '95

I don't like how Rock Prairie bends southward, it looks like the original idea for Rock Prairie was mostly a north-south road but decades ago the city decided to envision Rock Prairie Road as east-west, originally running from Highway 6 to Victoria (it didn't even reach FM 2154 for another decade after construction).

Could the power line right of way be widened used to create a roadway? Like if Rock Prairie Road (east of the highway) was re-aligned to follow it, it could take a lot of local traffic off Highway 6, connecting to University Drive East as well as Raintree, Windwood, Horse Haven, and Foxfire, without cutting through those neighborhoods directly. Maybe Raintree would be most affected but it wouldn't have to rip through neighborhoods. Emerald Parkway maybe, but the road wouldn't be physically affected.


I'll look this evening. Midtown/Lakeway needs to be one name and should've been designed to extend further, creating a nice elongated commercial corridor between it and the highway.

"Backage" roads like that do extremely well in traffic flow, commercial development, and separating neighborhoods from commercial.

They create a second "front door" for commerocal, give businesses rear access, delivery separation, and cross-access between adjacent lots without customers having to re-enter the arterial. It drives higher land utilization and often higher values.

And routing cut-through traffic onto the backage road makes residential streets stay residential. Buffers commercial and through-traffic friction so neighborhoods don't have to.

Midtown/Lakeway is a crucial road. That's going to be a neat area.

Respectfully

Yancy '95


Edited to add- look at Costco and Lowe's and tell me that's not one of the most convenient ways to access a big box retail that's possible. And quiet, enclave neighborhoods exist just on the other side, not through and through- and with a few connecting trails people can easily walk or bike to it.

Our staff planned that. We need more of it. Property value. Amenities. Quiet neighborhoods. That's College Station
AggiePhil
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We need to kill the name Lakeway. It's dumb. There is no lake. Just name it all Midtown.
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggiePhil said:

We need to kill the name Lakeway. It's dumb. There is no lake. Just name it all Midtown.


I like it. Good call.

Respectfully

Yancy '95
UhOhNoAgTag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Off subject, what is the status of SE Park/Texas Independence Park?
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UhOhNoAgTag said:

Off subject, what is the status of SE Park/Texas Independence Park?


It's funded to the tune of $7m worth of work this year. A few items on the list of citizen generated wants are being pushed down the road a bit.

Work should resume soon, by institutional standards I'd say.

Respectfully

Yancy '95
UhOhNoAgTag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What hasn't been "pushed down the road""?
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UhOhNoAgTag said:

What hasn't been "pushed down the road""?


I think the dog park will happen last. All else on front burner basically. I'm going from memory on that and not in a place to verify right now.

Apologetically

Yancy '95
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.