cslifer said:
Exactly, just a woman with a dog in a restaurant. He implied that because of who she was she needs it. Nobody needs or is entitled to a pet in a restaurant.
I took it as him implying she needs it bc her husband was murdered. Not bc of who her husband is, which is what you implied.
I'm not saying I'm in agreement with her having a dog in the restaurant, or any widow whose husband was murdered for that matter. Just clarifying that I don't think he was saying his opinion changed because the deceased was Chris Kyle.
I think if you need an emotional support animal to go out to eat, maybe you should just dine in. Idc who you are or what emotions you have.