quote:
There is nothing in there about conditions. Zero. You're an idiot if you drive 40. That's what you (and others) say.
maybe its because i am young i dont understand how an internet forum is so complicating for some people, heres how it works...
there is a thread, and it starts with an original post, and intellectual people start from there and realize all posts after the first post should be in reference to the original post.... the rain that day was no where near the rain on tuesday....the rain that day was not so bad you couldnt see....it was not icy....it was not flooded....it was not foggy....it was not night time.... there wasnt snow....as far as i know a beer truck did not dump its load on the highway...there were not cattle on the roadway... there was not a tornado....or an earthquake... or the fear that a hurricane would hit in three days...or mark sykes taking photos of pale white guys in bluebonnets using a red light camera and eating hooters chicken wings
just because its presidential election season doesnt mean you should take everything out of CONTEXT
obviously the FACTS presented by tliac support the slowing to 60 mph (under only wet conditions as they were on the day described by the original poster on texags aggieland forum) as being sufficient
those of you who think 40 is ok, do you think it is acceptable for emergency personnel to drive faster than 40 on just wet roads(the conditions experienced on the day of the original post on texags.com aggieland forum)...if a car is going to hydroplane, does it matter who is behind the wheel?
edit: on wet roads follow a vehicle considerably larger than you, such as a semi, make sure you are a good 5 feet away...when they hit their brakes, hit yours, if you slide, they will slide farther and hopefully clear the road in front of you
[This message has been edited by WATER TOWER (edited 8/14/2008 6:04p).]