Anybody know of any good kits to test for barium, aluminum, strontium, etc?
Kingdom Kid said:
Anybody know of any good kits to test for barium, aluminum, strontium, etc?
Quote:
stratospheric aerosol injection

Just make a very large tinfoil hat for your yard...Kingdom Kid said:
Anybody know of any good kits to test for barium, aluminum, strontium, etc?
Right...SanAntoneAg said:
9 post rook. His next post is that hogs ate his gramma.
Naveronski said:Right...SanAntoneAg said:
9 post rook. His next post is that hogs ate his gramma.
Was this a bot post?
You're right.cupofjoe04 said:Naveronski said:Right...SanAntoneAg said:
9 post rook. His next post is that hogs ate his gramma.
Was this a bot post?
I don't think so. Only posting history is a pretty decent back and forth about Sendero for mesquites. Maybe he just wants to make sure the chemicals he puts down don't react to the ones the government has been spraying us with from airplanes.
SunrayAg said:Just make a very large tinfoil hat for your yard...Kingdom Kid said:
Anybody know of any good kits to test for barium, aluminum, strontium, etc?
On the off-chance this is a serious question, there are no reliable "test kits" you can use at home like a pH kit that I am aware of. The two best ways to get an idea of what you have are to send a sample to a lab or to use an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Detector that you can rent from various environmental supply companies. The lab is going to give you very accurate results and if you run TAL metals by Method 6020A or 6020B, you will get 23 metals analyzed down to ~100 part per billion levels. There are lots of places that can run that method on soil, such as Pace Analytical, ALS Labs, Eurofins, SGS, etc. and it will generally cost about $125 per sample. The XRF rents for a few hundred dollars per day and will give you higher detection limits and less accuracy, but you can test dozens of samples in a day. The XRF is best used with a few samples also sent to a lab to "ground truth" your results.Kingdom Kid said:
Anybody know of any good kits to test for barium, aluminum, strontium, etc?
Naveronski said:You're right.cupofjoe04 said:Naveronski said:Right...SanAntoneAg said:
9 post rook. His next post is that hogs ate his gramma.
Was this a bot post?
I don't think so. Only posting history is a pretty decent back and forth about Sendero for mesquites. Maybe he just wants to make sure the chemicals he puts down don't react to the ones the government has been spraying us with from airplanes.
Joined 2012.
First post 2024.
Probably just a normal human.

txags92 said:On the off-chance this is a serious question, there are no reliable "test kits" you can use at home like a pH kit that I am aware of. The two best ways to get an idea of what you have are to send a sample to a lab or to use an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Detector that you can rent from various environmental supply companies. The lab is going to give you very accurate results and if you run TAL metals by Method 6020A or 6020B, you will get 23 metals analyzed down to ~100 part per billion levels. There are lots of places that can run that method on soil, such as Pace Analytical, ALS Labs, Eurofins, SGS, etc. and it will generally cost about $125 per sample. The XRF rents for a few hundred dollars per day and will give you higher detection limits and less accuracy, but you can test dozens of samples in a day. The XRF is best used with a few samples also sent to a lab to "ground truth" your results.Kingdom Kid said:
Anybody know of any good kits to test for barium, aluminum, strontium, etc?
When looking at results, keep in mind that there is a wide range of potential background concentrations that may exist, depending on what soil type you are in and what historical practices happened in your area. Texas publishes a list of "Texas Specific" metals background concentrations (https://www.tceq.texas.gov/downloads/remediation/trrp/background.pdf), but keep in mind that some metals, like aluminum, iron, etc. will vary widely depending on what minerals make up the actual soil, and being "above background" for those minerals is not necessarily representative of contamination.
CanyonAg77 said:
Are you interested in telling us why those are a concern?
Kingdom Kid said:CanyonAg77 said:
Are you interested in telling us why those are a concern?
Not really. There's plenty of legislation and documentation out there for people who want to know more. Again, really appreciate you Ags and all that you do to help Texas agriculture.
CanyonAg77 said:
To be somewhat serious, yes, there are studies and papers out on the process you mention.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_aerosol_injection
But it's a pretty big leap from scientists thinking that such a thing will stop global warming, to actually doing it.
I know of no government or organization that is actually trying such a thing.
There are a bunch of conspiracy theories out there claiming that the normal contrails you see behind aircraft, caused by water vapor in the atmosphere, are instead chemical spraying. Anyone the least bit connected with aviation or agriculture (lots of both here) can assure you these theories are nonsense. So when you come on here, apparently worried about such a thing, expect to be mocked.
Especially when the only other posts from your username are request for information to help you spray chemicals on your own place. You are worried about alleged chemicals released at 30,000 feet and dispersed over thousands of square miles, but not worried about spraying 10,000,000x higher concentrations yourself?
But hey, it's America, if you have the money, you can test for nearly anything. Go ahead and get the test, there is no danger, except to your mental state. As I said four days ago, unless you suspect an old dump where someone disposed of chemicals, you aren't going to find any concern.
If I have misinterpreted, I apologize. But your reluctance to explain yourself makes me think I am correct.