Just got our Utah concealed carry license, clearly need coverage. Curious about input from experiences with whichever one you have. Good bad or indifferent. We are open to any provider.
This. Find an attorney that knows the local magistrates and can find his way around the local court house. The chances of being in an incident that involves using your firearm are about the same as winning the lotto.dr_boogs said:
The old OB crew would tell you to skip the national services because you dont pick your attorney and they only cover certain amounts or hours, and to find a defense attorney in your area, make an appointment, and establish a client relationship and carry their number with you in your phone.
The services seem to provide access to legal counsel only. You need to get liability coverage to cover you against a judgment for civil damages against you.agsalaska said:
Why do you 'clearly need coverage'
That seems silly.
Texarkanaag69 said:The services seem to provide access to legal counsel only. You need to get liability coverage to cover you against a judgment for civil damages against you.agsalaska said:
Why do you 'clearly need coverage'
That seems silly.
An umbrella is only good if you have an underlying policy. It does not create a new type of coverage but simply adds more limits to the underlying coverage you have.TX AG 88 said:
high profile case lately where someone with this coverage used their CCW and the party that was supposed to defend them unilaterally decided it wasn't a "good shoot" and hung them out to dry. At least one, maybe two.
Just get an umbrella liability coverage if you think you need something, and have it cover you 24/7, whether a gun is involved or not.
who put a bug in your ear about coverage, if I may ask?
TX AG 88 said:
high profile case lately where someone with this coverage used their CCW and the party that was supposed to defend them unilaterally decided it wasn't a "good shoot" and hung them out to dry. At least one, maybe two.
Just get an umbrella liability coverage if you think you need something, and have it cover you 24/7, whether a gun is involved or not.
who put a bug in your ear about coverage, if I may ask?
Again, I'm telling you an umbrella policy DOES NOT provide new coverage. It only gives you another layer of money over your basic policy to protect you from civil liability. Doesn't have anything to do with lawyers. Unless you have a basic policy to cover you for a "bad shoot" you ain't gonna cover your rear with an umbrella. I promise you that if you go out and shoot the intended target or miss and hit an innocent bystander a jury's going to decide your liability and your homeowner policy ain't gonna cover that. Nor will an umbrella unless you have an underlying basic policy that covers your shots.Cromagnum said:TX AG 88 said:
high profile case lately where someone with this coverage used their CCW and the party that was supposed to defend them unilaterally decided it wasn't a "good shoot" and hung them out to dry. At least one, maybe two.
Just get an umbrella liability coverage if you think you need something, and have it cover you 24/7, whether a gun is involved or not.
who put a bug in your ear about coverage, if I may ask?
That's pretty ****ty, when scumbag lawyers wake up every single day to defend murderers hoping for parole.
Texarkanaag69 said:Again, I'm telling you an umbrella policy DOES NOT provide new coverage. It only gives you another layer of money over your basic policy to protect you from civil liability. Doesn't have anything to do with lawyers. Unless you have a basic policy to cover you for a "bad shoot" you ain't gonna cover your rear with an umbrella. I promise you that if you go out and shoot the intended target or miss and hit an innocent bystander a jury's going to decide your liability and your homeowner policy ain't gonna cover that. Nor will an umbrella unless you have an underlying basic policy that covers your shots.Cromagnum said:TX AG 88 said:
high profile case lately where someone with this coverage used their CCW and the party that was supposed to defend them unilaterally decided it wasn't a "good shoot" and hung them out to dry. At least one, maybe two.
Just get an umbrella liability coverage if you think you need something, and have it cover you 24/7, whether a gun is involved or not.
who put a bug in your ear about coverage, if I may ask?
That's pretty ****ty, when scumbag lawyers wake up every single day to defend murderers hoping for parole.
Not necessarily. If your agent that covers your property also writes umbrellas there are many positives to having all of your coverages with one agent. The agent may have to spread your coverage with more than one carrier but he'll know what you have and can avoid any gaps in coverage. It's not unusual for your agent to go to a different carrier for umbrella coverage. But please remember you need a basic policy to cover you against civil damage liability from someone who's injured by your shot. Hope that helps.TX AG 88 said:Texarkanaag69 said:Again, I'm telling you an umbrella policy DOES NOT provide new coverage. It only gives you another layer of money over your basic policy to protect you from civil liability. Doesn't have anything to do with lawyers. Unless you have a basic policy to cover you for a "bad shoot" you ain't gonna cover your rear with an umbrella. I promise you that if you go out and shoot the intended target or miss and hit an innocent bystander a jury's going to decide your liability and your homeowner policy ain't gonna cover that. Nor will an umbrella unless you have an underlying basic policy that covers your shots.Cromagnum said:TX AG 88 said:
high profile case lately where someone with this coverage used their CCW and the party that was supposed to defend them unilaterally decided it wasn't a "good shoot" and hung them out to dry. At least one, maybe two.
Just get an umbrella liability coverage if you think you need something, and have it cover you 24/7, whether a gun is involved or not.
who put a bug in your ear about coverage, if I may ask?
That's pretty ****ty, when scumbag lawyers wake up every single day to defend murderers hoping for parole.
gotcha, good to know. never looked into insurance for gun related incidents, so didn't know that. only context umbrella policies have come up is in regards to rental properties, so my exposure to the subject is limited. if one were to get an umbrella policy, would the underwriter of the umbrella have to be the same entity that carried the underlying policy/policies? that could sure limit your choices/raise your costs...
Don't disagree. But if your good shot goes bad and you wound or kill an innocent bystander your education ain't gonna protect you. And if a jury finds you liable you're going to wish you had insurance coverage to pay the judgment against you. Whatever your bullet hits after it hits the bad guy you're going to pay for. Shoot on!!InfantryAg said:
Not sure what the Utah CHL class covers but the cheapest "insurance" is education. Make sure you know self defense laws for the state(s) you will be in. Take a class if you can find a good instructor (attorney or LE?).
Also, learn how to be a "hard target" and proactively avoid situations. Criminals are looking for easy targets and you should have good situational awareness.
Their homeowner's policy will not cover that. Call your agent and ask him/ her if your homeowner's policy covers you for a shooting incident. Let me know what answer you get. Seriously. Don't think it matters whether shooting occurs on your home property or elsewhere, my opinion is that the liability part of your homeowner's policy will not protect you. Hope you can prove me wrong.LOYAL AG said:
So what is the answer in terms of insurance? Right now I'd say a good portion of the population that carries is covered on by their homeowners insurance. Is there an insurance that might help if the unexpected happens?
Texarkanaag69 said:Their homeowner's policy will not cover that. Call your agent and ask him/ her if your homeowner's policy covers you for a shooting incident. Let me know what answer you get. Seriously. Don't think it matters whether shooting occurs on your home property or elsewhere, my opinion is that the liability part of your homeowner's policy will not protect you. Hope you can prove me wrong.LOYAL AG said:
So what is the answer in terms of insurance? Right now I'd say a good portion of the population that carries is covered on by their homeowners insurance. Is there an insurance that might help if the unexpected happens?
For anyone reading this I suggest that you call your insurance and pose the question to them.