Explain to me the ROW versus easement like I'm 5 years old please.
Accurate.Ag210 said:
ROW - Based on the pictures this appears to be a state highway / fm road. ROW would refer to the State road Right of Way, the land outside of your property owned by the state that contains the road, ditch, etc… TXDoT will grant utilities permits to install facilities within the state ROW provided they meet certain criteria.
Easement - An easement (or often called a Right of way easement) would give the utility the specific rights to install and maintain facilities (along with other defined uses) on your specific property.
Gunny456 said:
You know perhaps the OP also owns across the road. If it is owned by someone else maybe that guy would not care. That's how it worked for me. Not going to do any harm to ask.
We had encore in Kimble county. Never knew them to run distribution lines to landowners. That was the job of the CO-OP in our county.
213 Grove said:
I get that but how they have it marked makes no sense. Wondering if they mislabeled. I work in utility coordination and work with Oncor a lot.
My two sense is those stakes represent the edge/limits of the right of way and they ordered this survey first so they can design their pole placement. Utility companies typically place their poles 2 feet inside the right of way barring no other conflicts.
I think it's #1 unless you find an easement that was previously recorded on your property. Electric distribution lines are routinely placed in TxDOT right-of-way (ROW), usually in the outer three feet of the ROW or so pursuant to TxDOT"s utility accommodation rules that someone else mentioned above. I'm not suggesting you & your neighbors have to like it, but this is a common practice in TX.nactownag said:
Pretty much every landowner up and down this road is ready to fight this.
So basically there's two possibilities here.
1. They have a row because the state granted it to them via permit
2. Someone back in the day granted them an easement onto my property
Seems like 1 is more likely?
HTownAg98 said:
Utilities have been running lines in state ROW for as long as the state has allowed it. Turns out that people like using electricity to light and heat their home instead of kerosene and wood burning stoves.
nactownag said:
I am not receiving power from this line. I'm on a co op.
So no it isn't benefitting me in any way.
nactownag said:
I'm sure you would be offering up your land as tribute in you were in my shoes.
nactownag said:
In the city sure. Where I am it's not uncommon to not see power lines as you can see I don't have them currently.
nactownag said:
I don't disagree but I'll do what I can to make life difficult.
The power for my house is buried. No poles. I'm not sure where it is sourced from but obviously not coming in from poles. I'm on deep east Texas co-op.
Gunny456 said:
You have folks on here that have not invested money, time, hard work, and don't understand what it is like to have something like this happen to your land…..because they don't own any that is affected by it.
All power lines/transmission line construction cost accrued by these private companies approved by the PUC are guaranteed to have their cost reimbursed to them within a set amount of time. This " cost" is payed back to them by an increase of electric rates for all users.
We found this out when fighting a transmission line years back that was coming through our land.
So while these companies will spew " budget and cost" to you …. They, in reality, have no skin in the game.
We hired an appraiser company that deals with the construction of power/transmission lines and how much those cause a depreciation of property value. It helped us greatly in negotiating a pathway for the lines.
We took a trip to the UK last summer and it was amazing that most all utilities are buried.
Whatever Barnes. You're full of crap and you know it.Gunny456 said:
Tarpon. I'm not going to argue with you on this. Myself and many other landowners lived the fight with our attorneys for two years on a power line issue. We had various meetings with the PUC and at the time, an Aggie was the PUC director. Our attorney had actually worked for the power entity many years before representing us and 31 other landowners as a group.
The things we discovered and learned during that two year journey were very eye opening. Believe what you want. We know what we were told and the facts we learned.
Just like they told us how the construction of the line would benefit all of Texas with jobs and buying of materials….. and then the Governors chief of staff found out that all the steel and wire was manufactured in foreign countries and all the labor was from a company in Minnesota. You're right…. It's absurd.
Gunny456 said:
Do some research and see if you can find some old deeds/surveys to your place. A neighbor of mine had a similar issue a few years back. His attorney found that before the road was a state highway it was a county road that the landowners granted right of way for the road. His deed/survey still showed him owning to the middle of the road and the attorney found some old wording of the original county ROW agreement that prohibited the construction of utilities.
Many landowners along the road fought it. They built the line in the ROW but ended up burying it I believe. He passed away shortly thereafter anyway.
A transmission line on your property is an apple to the orange that is a distribution line that abuts your property. You can fight the latter all you want, but if they have the right to be there by easement or permit, they can do pretty much whatever they want within the terms of that easement/permit. And you can't recover anything for being adjacent to a power line when said line isn't on your property. All I'd do is make sure they're operating where they're supposed to be, and find something else to spend my time on.Gunny456 said:
You have folks on here that have not invested money, time, hard work, and don't understand what it is like to have something like this happen to your land…..because they don't own any that is affected by it.
All power lines/transmission line construction cost accrued by these private companies approved by the PUC are guaranteed to have their cost reimbursed to them within a set amount of time. This " cost" is payed back to them by an increase of electric rates for all users.
We found this out when fighting a transmission line years back that was coming through our land.
So while these companies will spew " budget and cost" to you …. They, in reality, have no skin in the game.
We hired an appraiser company that deals with the construction of power/transmission lines and how much those cause a depreciation of property value. It helped us greatly in negotiating a pathway for the lines.
We took a trip to the UK last summer and it was amazing that most all utilities are buried.
I wonder how prescriptive rights would weigh in. Don't know if the right to lay utilities would be one of those prescriptive rights.normaleagle05 said:Gunny456 said:
Do some research and see if you can find some old deeds/surveys to your place. A neighbor of mine had a similar issue a few years back. His attorney found that before the road was a state highway it was a county road that the landowners granted right of way for the road. His deed/survey still showed him owning to the middle of the road and the attorney found some old wording of the original county ROW agreement that prohibited the construction of utilities.
Many landowners along the road fought it. They built the line in the ROW but ended up burying it I believe. He passed away shortly thereafter anyway.
OP absolutely has a similar situation with regard to creation of the FM right of way here.
TarponChaser said:Whatever Barnes. You're full of crap and you know it.Gunny456 said:
Tarpon. I'm not going to argue with you on this. Myself and many other landowners lived the fight with our attorneys for two years on a power line issue. We had various meetings with the PUC and at the time, an Aggie was the PUC director. Our attorney had actually worked for the power entity many years before representing us and 31 other landowners as a group.
The things we discovered and learned during that two year journey were very eye opening. Believe what you want. We know what we were told and the facts we learned.
Just like they told us how the construction of the line would benefit all of Texas with jobs and buying of materials….. and then the Governors chief of staff found out that all the steel and wire was manufactured in foreign countries and all the labor was from a company in Minnesota. You're right…. It's absurd.