How long after passing the written test do I have to take the shooting test? I took the class online and now need to find a place to take the shooting test. Just wondering how much time I have to get it scheduled/passed.
aTm2004 said:
Not sure, but I wouldn't sweat it. A guy who literally got yelled at by the instructor for sweeping a loaded gun across people and hitting targets in other lanes passed the CHL class I took years ago. I'd imagine it's a lot more lenient now.
the 9 is still 5 points, right?schmellba99 said:
I'm still irked that I shot a 249/250. Pulled one friggin shot at the 15 yard range and hit the 9 ring.
Literally did the exact same thing, and it still haunts me.schmellba99 said:
I'm still irked that I shot a 249/250. Pulled one friggin shot at the 15 yard range and hit the 9 ring.
trying to understand how they got to 249 by hitting the 9. Seems like that would take hitting the 7jrb2019 said:
Yes. And so is the 8.
Professional Hitter said:
The LTC test is absolutely useless for actual concealed carry. I wish they would drastically revamp it for concealed carry. Draw from a holster, draw from concealment and time.
Fair point here.BenderRodriguez said:Professional Hitter said:
The LTC test is absolutely useless for actual concealed carry. I wish they would drastically revamp it for concealed carry. Draw from a holster, draw from concealment and time.
I get the sentiment, but I disagree.
Govt standards will never be good, fair or useful. If theres going to be a test (and there shouldnt be one), it should be insanely easy, like it is now.
Becoming an actual competent human with a handgun is on the individual.
So how do we compel them to be competent?BenderRodriguez said:Professional Hitter said:
The LTC test is absolutely useless for actual concealed carry. I wish they would drastically revamp it for concealed carry. Draw from a holster, draw from concealment and time.
I get the sentiment, but I disagree.
Govt standards will never be good, fair or useful. If theres going to be a test (and there shouldnt be one), it should be insanely easy, like it is now.
Becoming an actual competent human with a handgun is on the individual.
JFABNRGR said:
I and my family are out in public with these people.
An instructor explained this to me that it's more about being as accurate as possible with multiple rounds fired quickly at various distances to minimize the possibility of collateral injuries in a real-world scenario.Professional Hitter said:
The LTC test is absolutely useless for actual concealed carry. I wish they would drastically revamp it for concealed carry. Draw from a holster, draw from concealment and time.
You've been out in public with those people since 1995. Have they shot you yet? You'll be even more horrified to learn people can carry a gun in TX now with no license or required training. We haven't had a rash of negligent discharges in public over the last 27 years.JFABNRGR said:So how do we compel them to be competent?BenderRodriguez said:Professional Hitter said:
The LTC test is absolutely useless for actual concealed carry. I wish they would drastically revamp it for concealed carry. Draw from a holster, draw from concealment and time.
I get the sentiment, but I disagree.
Govt standards will never be good, fair or useful. If theres going to be a test (and there shouldnt be one), it should be insanely easy, like it is now.
Becoming an actual competent human with a handgun is on the individual.
I and my family are out in public with these people.
But the shots aren't fired quickly during the LTC test. These are all from the ready. Every one of those is 2-3 seconds between shots. Real world scenario, you'd likely be dead if you shot that slowly. That 1 shot, in 2 seconds, drawn from concealment would still be slow but a better test of a "real--world scenario"Ryan the Temp said:An instructor explained this to me that it's more about being as accurate as possible with multiple rounds fired quickly at various distances to minimize the possibility of collateral injuries in a real-world scenario.Professional Hitter said:
The LTC test is absolutely useless for actual concealed carry. I wish they would drastically revamp it for concealed carry. Draw from a holster, draw from concealment and time.
ETA: Many ranges have specific restrictions on draw firing for safety reasons.
schmellba99 said:
I'm still irked that I shot a 249/250. Pulled one friggin shot at the 15 yard range and hit the 9 ring.
Most real world scenarios are more like you reach/draw on a BG and he runs away fast. The # of defensive drawing/brandishing incidences is orders of magnitude higher than defensive trigger pulls.txyaloo said:But the shots aren't fired quickly during the LTC test. These are all from the ready. Every one of those is 2-3 seconds between shots. Real world scenario, you'd likely be dead if you shot that slowly. That 1 shot, in 2 seconds, drawn from concealment would still be slow but a better test of a "real--world scenario"Ryan the Temp said:An instructor explained this to me that it's more about being as accurate as possible with multiple rounds fired quickly at various distances to minimize the possibility of collateral injuries in a real-world scenario.Professional Hitter said:
The LTC test is absolutely useless for actual concealed carry. I wish they would drastically revamp it for concealed carry. Draw from a holster, draw from concealment and time.
ETA: Many ranges have specific restrictions on draw firing for safety reasons.
Course of Fire:
3 yard line - 20 shots:7 yard line - 20 shots:
- 1 shot in 2 seconds, 5 times
- 2 shots in 3 seconds, 5 times
- 5 shots in 10 seconds, once
15 yard line - 10 shots:
- 5 shots in 10 seconds, once
- 1 shot in 3 seconds, 5 times
- 2 shots in 4 seconds, once
- 3 shots in 6 seconds, once
- 5 shots in 15 seconds, once
- 2 shots in 6 seconds, once
- 3 shots in 9 seconds, once
- 5 shots in 15 seconds, once
BenderRodriguez said:
Eta: on a personal level you could try making fun of every chl holder you know who isnt shooting competitions and taking classes (if you're doing more than the bare minimum yourself). If their "training" starts and ends with the state mandated hours and telling people "ive been shooting for 20 years!"….yeah….those guys arent as good as they think they are. Mockery among friends is always good for personal development. ;-)
Well I'm sure "quickly" is a relative term, but that's what the instructor told me. I shot a 250, so I didn't really care about all the minutiae of the test. The only time I've ever done draw firing was when I certified on the M-9.txyaloo said:But the shots aren't fired quickly during the LTC test. These are all from the ready. Every one of those is 2-3 seconds between shots. Real world scenario, you'd likely be dead if you shot that slowly. That 1 shot, in 2 seconds, drawn from concealment would still be slow but a better test of a "real--world scenario"Ryan the Temp said:An instructor explained this to me that it's more about being as accurate as possible with multiple rounds fired quickly at various distances to minimize the possibility of collateral injuries in a real-world scenario.Professional Hitter said:
The LTC test is absolutely useless for actual concealed carry. I wish they would drastically revamp it for concealed carry. Draw from a holster, draw from concealment and time.
ETA: Many ranges have specific restrictions on draw firing for safety reasons.
Course of Fire:
3 yard line - 20 shots:7 yard line - 20 shots:
- 1 shot in 2 seconds, 5 times
- 2 shots in 3 seconds, 5 times
- 5 shots in 10 seconds, once
15 yard line - 10 shots:
- 5 shots in 10 seconds, once
- 1 shot in 3 seconds, 5 times
- 2 shots in 4 seconds, once
- 3 shots in 6 seconds, once
- 5 shots in 15 seconds, once
- 2 shots in 6 seconds, once
- 3 shots in 9 seconds, once
- 5 shots in 15 seconds, once
SMM48 said:
One reason
No wait time at ffl.
B. If pulled over the fuzz can see you are have ltc and may cut you a break.
D. cause you really like hearing texas law shield advertisement and having some schmo tell you stories that are semi made up.