To clarify, my response on the forced sale was strictly on an undivided interest. If everything is structured through an LLC, I think things are definitely easier to manage and it sounds like that is absolutely the way to go if possible. At that point, there is no longer undivided interest in the property as the LLC is sole owner.Bronco6G said:Not necessarily true, the devil is in the LLC formation details. You can make it however you want. You can make it have to be unanimous if you want, you can make it require 66%. You can write in the right of first refusals if someone wants to get out. You can make it as restrictive or unrestrictive as you want, my advice is to get a real estate attorney and get everyone on the same page and have the attorney draw it up.jpb1999 said:Yuck, if that is true. I was leaning on going into an estate with my 2 other siblings on the land. Not sure what the best way to do this though. We all trust each other and don't want to sell... also don't want to divide up the property.agstudent said:From my research, yes, for estate tax purposes, you can usually claim a 15%-20% reduction in value.chris1515 said:
For estate tax purposes, is a property that is left as an undivided interest going to get a lower appraisal?
If one individual does wish to sell and others do not, how does that work? Can the one force the sale of the entire property?
Very timely thread…
And yes, one individual can generally force a sale of the entire property. The alternative would be a forced partition, but that tends to be more complicated and the courts shy away from it in lieu of a sale.